Design and evaluation of a curved computer keyboard

Conventional, straight keyboards remain the most popular design among keyboards sold and used with personal computers despite the biomechanical benefits offered by alternative keyboard designs. Some typists indicate that the daunting medical device-like appearance of these alternative ‘ergonomic’ keyboards is the reason for not purchasing an alternative keyboard design. The purpose of this research was to create a new computer keyboard that promoted more neutral postures in the wrist while maintaining the approachability and typing performance of a straight keyboard. The design process created a curved alphanumeric keyboard, designed to reduce ulnar deviation, and a built-in, padded wrist-rest to reduce wrist extension. Typing performance, wrist postures and perceptions of fatigue when using the new curved keyboard were compared to those when using a straight keyboard design. The curved keyboard reduced ulnar deviation by 2.2° ± 0.7 (p < 0.01). Relative to the straight keyboard without a built-in wrist-rest, the prototype curved keyboard with the built-in padded wrist-rest reduced wrist extension by 6.3° ± 1.2 (p < 0.01). There were no differences in typing speed or accuracy between keyboards. Perceived fatigue ratings were significantly lower in the hands, forearms and shoulders with the curved keyboard. The new curved keyboard achieved its design goal of reducing discomfort and promoting more neutral wrist postures while not compromising users' preferences and typing performance.

[1]  K H Kroemer Human Engineering the Keyboard , 1972, Human factors.

[2]  G. Borg Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. , 1982, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[3]  J. Buesen Product development of an ergonomic keyboard , 1984 .

[4]  M. Nakaseko,et al.  Studies on Ergonomically Designed Alphanumeric Keyboards , 1985, Human factors.

[5]  Rolf Ilg Ergonomic keyboard design , 1987 .

[6]  J. Heckman,et al.  The clinical measurement of joint motion , 1994 .

[7]  C. Chen,et al.  Quantitative Evaluation of 4 Computer Keyboards: Wrist Posture and Typing Performance , 1994 .

[8]  Peter W. Johnson,et al.  User Preferences between Keyboards while Performing “Real” Work: A Comparison of “Alternative” and Standard Keyboards , 1995 .

[9]  Elaine Serina,et al.  Wrist Postures While Typing on a Standard and Split Keyboard , 1995 .

[10]  D. Rempel,et al.  Changes in wrist postures during a prolonged typing task , 1996 .

[11]  C S Pan,et al.  The impact of keyboard design on comfort and productivity in a text-entry task. , 1997, Applied ergonomics.

[12]  Richard W. Marklin,et al.  Wrist and Forearm Posture from Typing on Split and Vertically Inclined Computer Keyboards , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[13]  D. Rempel,et al.  Effect of Four Computer Keyboards in Computer Users with Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders , 1999, American journal of industrial medicine.

[14]  A Zecevic,et al.  An evaluation of the ergonomics of three computer keyboards , 2000, Ergonomics.

[15]  M. Hagberg,et al.  Comparison of measurement accuracy between two wrist goniometer systems during pronation and supination. , 2002, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[16]  H. Strasser,et al.  Muscle strain of the hand-arm-shoulder system during typing at conventional and ergonomic keyboards , 2004 .

[17]  Alan Barr,et al.  The effect of six keyboard designs on wrist and forearm postures , 2007 .

[18]  Alan Barr,et al.  The Effect of Six Keyboard Designs on Wrist and Forearm Postures , 2006, Applied ergonomics.

[19]  David Rempel,et al.  The Split Keyboard: An Ergonomics Success Story , 2008, Hum. Factors.