The timing of the conscious intention to move

The foundation of modern neuroscience and psychology about intention for action was laid by B. Libet et al. [(1983) Brain106, 623–642]. They reported the time of awareness of wanting to move to be about 0.2 s before voluntary movement onset. However, despite repeated confirmation of the result, their method has been criticised for its dependence on self‐reported timing and subjective memory, and the interpretation has been widely debated without general consensus. Here, we show that the mean time of the conscious intention to move was 1.42 s before movement, estimated based on the subject’s real‐time decision of whether or not there was a thought to move when a tone occurred. This event is after the onset of the bereitschaftspotential, an electroencephalographic activity preceding voluntary movement, but about 1 s earlier than the timing of intention reported previously based on the subject’s recall. Our result solves some problems of the conventional method, thus giving a clearer answer to the controversies. The difference between the conventional result and our result suggests that the perception of intention rises through multiple levels of awareness, starting just after the brain initiates movement.

[1]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  B. Libet Brain stimulation in the study of neuronal functions for conscious sensory experiences. , 1982, Human neurobiology.

[3]  G. Logan,et al.  On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: a model and a method. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  T J Sejnowski,et al.  Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. , 2000, Science.

[5]  C. Spence,et al.  Multisensory prior entry. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  Romi Nijhawan,et al.  Motion extrapolation in catching , 1994, Nature.

[7]  H. Heckhausen,et al.  Readiness potentials preceding spontaneous motor acts: voluntary vs. involuntary control. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  Martin Eimer,et al.  The lateralized readiness potential as an on-line measure of central response activation processes , 1998 .

[9]  D. Dennett,et al.  The Nature of Consciousness , 2006 .

[10]  M. Hallett,et al.  What is the Bereitschaftspotential? , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  John Duncan,et al.  Within-modality and cross-modality attentional blinks in a simple discrimination task , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Mary Florentine,et al.  Spectral loudness summation and simple reaction time. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  M. Brass,et al.  Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  J. Smallwood,et al.  The restless mind. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  Joseph L. Fleiss,et al.  The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments: Fleiss/The Design , 1999 .

[16]  P. Haggard,et al.  Altered awareness of voluntary action after damage to the parietal cortex , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  R. Marois,et al.  Capacity limits of information processing in the brain , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  G. Rollman Sensory events with variable central latencies provide inaccurate clocks , 1985, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[19]  M. Hallett Volitional control of movement: The physiology of free will , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[20]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  J. Fleiss The design and analysis of clinical experiments , 1987 .

[22]  G. Gomes The Interpretation of Libet's Results on the Timing of Conscious Events: A Commentary , 2002, Consciousness and Cognition.

[23]  B. Libet Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action , 1985, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[24]  R. D. de Jong,et al.  Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  G. Logan,et al.  In search of the point of no return: the control of response processes. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  P. Haggard,et al.  On the relation between brain potentials and the awareness of voluntary movements , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  S. Holm A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[28]  R. Passingham,et al.  Attention to Intention , 2004, Science.

[29]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[30]  J. Marron,et al.  Improved Variable Window Kernel Estimates of Probability Densities , 1995 .

[31]  Hakwan C. Lau,et al.  Manipulating the Experienced Onset of Intention after Action Execution , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  G D Logan,et al.  Strategies and mechanisms in nonselective and selective inhibitory motor control. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  I. Gordon,et al.  Stimulus Probability and Simple Reaction Time , 1967, Nature.

[34]  B. Libet,et al.  Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. , 1983, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[35]  J. Simonoff Smoothing Methods in Statistics , 1998 .