Local dynamic buckling of FPSO steel catenary riser by coupled time-domain simulations

Steel catenary riser (SCR) is a popular/economical solution for the oil/gas production in deep and ultra-deep water. The behavioral characteristics of SCR have a high correlation with the motion of floating production facility at its survival and operational environments. When large motions of surface floaters occur, such as FPSO in 100-yr storm case, they can cause unacceptable negative tension on SCR near TDZ (touch down zone) and the corresponding elastic deflection can be large due to local dynamic buckling. The generation, propagation, and decay of the elastic wave are also affected by SCR and seabed soil interaction effects. The temporary local dynamic buckling vanishes with the recovery of tension on SCR with the upheaval motion of surface floater. Unlike larger-scale, an-order-of-magnitude longer period global buckling driven by heat and pressure variations in subsea pipelines, the sub-critical local dynamic buckling of SCR is motion-driven and short cycled, which, however, can lead to permanent structural damage when the resulting stress is greatly amplified beyond the elastic limit. The phenomenon is extensively investigated in this paper by using the vessel-mooring-riser coupled dynamic analysis program. It is found that the moment of large downward heave motion at the farthest-horizontal-offset position is the most dangerous for the local dynamic buckling.

[1]  Charles Aubeny,et al.  Seafloor-Riser Interaction Model , 2009 .

[2]  H. Y. Kang,et al.  Hydrodynamic interactions and coupled dynamics between a container ship and multiple mobile harbors , 2012 .

[3]  Malcolm D. Bolton,et al.  Pipe-Soil Interaction during Lateral Buckling and Pipeline Walking — The SAFEBUCK JIP , 2008 .

[4]  Xin Li,et al.  Pipe Walking-Lateral Buckling Interaction , 2010 .

[5]  Ruxin Song,et al.  Advances in Deepwater Steel Catenary Riser Technology State-of-the-Art: Part II—Analysis , 2009 .

[6]  Mike Campbell,et al.  IMPROVED SCR DESIGN FOR DYNAMIC VESSEL APPLICATIONS , 2010 .

[7]  Malcolm D. Bolton,et al.  Pipe-Soil Interaction Behaviour during Lateral Buckling , 2006 .

[8]  J.E.W. Wichers,et al.  Effect of Coupling of Mooring Lines And Risers On the Design Values For a Turret Moored FPSO In Deep Water of the Gulf of Mexico , 2001 .

[9]  Basim Mekha,et al.  Compression Assessment of Deepwater Steel Catenary Risers at Touch Down Zone , 2007 .

[10]  Moo-Hyun Kim,et al.  Hydrodynamic interactions and relative motions of two floating platforms with mooring lines in side-by-side offloading operation , 2005 .

[11]  E. G. Ward,et al.  Vessel/mooring/riser coupled dynamic analysis of a turret-moored FPSO compared with OTRC experiment , 2005 .

[12]  Arcandra Tahar,et al.  Hull/mooring/riser coupled dynamic analysis and sensitivity study of a tanker-based FPSO , 2003 .

[13]  Chan K. Yang,et al.  The structural safety assessment of a tie-down system on a tension leg platform during hurricane events , 2011 .

[14]  F. Smith,et al.  Guidelines for Compression Modeling in Flexible Risers for Deepwater Applications , 2003 .

[15]  Breno Pinheiro Jacob,et al.  Alternative Configurations For Steel Catenary Risers For Turret-Moored FPSOs , 1999 .

[16]  Andrei V. Metrikine,et al.  Destabilization of deep-water risers by a heaving platform , 2008 .

[17]  Charles Aubeny,et al.  Interaction Model for Steel Compliant Riser on Soft Seabed , 2008 .