Value-Affirmative and Value-Protective Processing of Alcohol Education Messages That Include Statistical Evidence or Anecdotes

This study of persuasion processes in a value-relevant context tests effects of the presence or absence of statistical evidence and the presence or absence of anecdotal evidence, crossed across three base messages regarding different alcohol use issues. Results suggest that a variant of central processing as described by Petty and Cacioppo (1986) was used: Involvement predicted greater message-relevant responses only when the message was congruent with recipients' own values regarding alcohol use. Among recipients for whom the message was value-congruent, messages with statistical evidence were rated more persuasive, more believable, and better written; anecdotal evidence had no effect. Among recipients for whom the message was value-discrepant, messages with anecdotal evidence were rated more persuasive, more believable, and (marginally) better written, and statistical evidence had no effect. Path analyses also suggest that peripheral-processing strategies are employed when the message is value-discrepant, and central-processing strategies are used when the message is value-congruent.

[1]  Rhetoric and Argumentation , 1998 .

[2]  Michael D. Slater,et al.  Persuasion Processes Across Receiver Goals and Message Genres , 1997 .

[3]  Paul A. Mongeau,et al.  Cognitive Processing of Fear-Arousing Message Content , 1995 .

[4]  E. Austin,et al.  Source v. Content Effects on Judgments of News Believability , 1994 .

[5]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  The Temporal Effects of Story and Statistical Evidence on Belief Change , 1994 .

[6]  Hans-Bernd Brosius,et al.  The Utility of Exemplars in Persuasive Communications , 1994 .

[7]  Sally Jackson,et al.  Random Factors in ANOVA , 1993 .

[8]  Paul A. Mongeau,et al.  Specifying Causal Relationships in the Elaboration Likelihood Model , 1993 .

[9]  Dean Kazoleas,et al.  A comparison of the persuasive effectiveness of qualitative versus quantitative evidence: A test of explanatory hypotheses , 1993 .

[10]  L. Johnston.  Smoking, Drinking, and Illicit Drug Use among American Secondary School Students, College Students, and Young Adults, 1975-1991. Volume II: College Students and Young Adults. , 1992 .

[11]  M. Slater.  Use of Message Stimuli in Mass Communication Experiments: A Methodological Assessment and Discussion , 1991 .

[12]  D. O’Keefe.  Persuasion , 1990, The Handbook of Communication Skills.

[13]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  Effects of involvement on persuasion: a meta-analysis , 1989 .

[14]  Joohn C. Reinard.  The Empirical Study of the Persuasive Effects of Evidence The Status After Fifty Years of Research , 1988 .

[15]  Richard F. Beltramini,et al.  Perceived Believability of Warning Label Information Presented in Cigarette Advertising , 1988 .

[16]  Carl A. Kallgren,et al.  Communicator Attributes and Persuasion , 1988, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[17]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[18]  Thomas R. Koballa.  Persuading Teachers to Reexamine the Innovative Elementary Science Programs of Yesterday: The Effect of Anecdotal Versus Data-Summary Communications. , 1986 .

[19]  Rebecca Elmore-Yalch,et al.  The Effect of Numbers on the Route to Persuasion , 1984 .

[20]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The Effects of Involvement on Responses to Argument Quantity and Quality: Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion , 1984 .

[21]  J. Mandler.  Stories, Scripts, and Scenes: Aspects of Schema Theory , 1984 .

[22]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The effects of a salient self-schema on the evaluation of proattitudinal editorials: Top-down versus bottom-up message processing , 1982 .

[23]  W. Wood.  Retrieval of attitude-relevant information from memory: Effects on susceptibility to persuasion and on intrinsic motivation. , 1982 .

[24]  Martin Fishbein,et al.  Acceptance yielding and impact: cognitive processes in persuasion. , 1981 .

[25]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Insensitivity to sample bias: Generalizing from atypical cases , 1980 .

[26]  William Witt,et al.  Effects of numerical data upon reading time and recall of scientific writing. , 1974 .

[27]  C. Sherif,et al.  Personal involvement, social judgment, and action. , 1973 .

[28]  A. Tversky,et al.  BELIEF IN THE LAW OF SMALL NUMBERS , 1971, Pediatrics.

[29]  J. Mccroskey.  A summary of experimental research on the effects of evidence in persuasive communication , 1969 .

[30]  C. Insko.  One-sided versus two-sided communications and countercommunications. , 1962 .