Severe Loading Assessment of Modern and New Proposed Beam to Column Connections

The performance of two different steel beam to column connections known as SidePlateTM and a new proposed connection by seismic loading and progressive collapse were investigated in this research. Seismic performance evaluated included consideration of interstory drift angles and flexural strengths based on 2010 AISC Seismic Provisions while investigation of progressive collapse was conducted through satisfaction of acceptance criteria by rotational capacities of the connections provided in UFC 4-023-03 guideline. The results indicated that both SidePlate and the new proposed moment connection were capable of achieving adequate rotational capacity and developing full inelastic capacity of the connecting beam. Also, an excellent performance was exhibited by the connections in terms of keeping the plastic hinges away from the connection and exceeding interstory drift angle of 0.06 rad without fracture developments in beam flange groove-welded joints. Based on results, it was concluded that the SidePlate and the new proposed connection possess sufficient stiffness, strength and ductility to be classified as rigid, full-strength and ductile connections.

[1]  W. J. Hall,et al.  Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings , 2001 .

[2]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Seismic rehabilitation performance of steel side plate moment connections , 2009 .

[3]  David N. Bilow,et al.  U.S. General Services Administration Progressive Collapse Design Guidelines Applied to Concrete Moment-Resisting Frame Buildings , 2004 .

[4]  Michael D. Engelhardt,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Cyclically Loaded Reduced Beam Section Moment Connections , 2002 .

[5]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Experimental behavior of bolted angles and beam-to-column connections , 2014 .

[6]  W. J. Hall,et al.  Recommended Seismic Evaluation and Upgrade Criteria for Existing Welded Steel Moment-Frame Buildings , 2000 .

[7]  Vitelmo V. Bertero,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Plate-Reinforced Steel Moment-Resisting Connections , 2002 .

[8]  Ali Abolmaali,et al.  Probabilistic seismic demand assessment of steel moment frames with side-plate connections , 2012 .

[9]  Zhaohui Huang,et al.  Progressive collapse analysis of steel structures under fire conditions , 2012 .

[10]  J. L. Liu.  Preventing progressive collapse through strengthening beam-to-column connection, Part 1: Theoretical analysis , 2010 .

[11]  Franco Bontempi,et al.  Numerical analyses for the structural assessment of steel buildings under explosions , 2013 .

[12]  Theodor Krauthammer,et al.  Finite element analysis of steel beam to column connections subjected to blast loads , 2005 .

[13]  Amir A. Hedayat,et al.  Post-Northridge connection with modified beam end configuration to enhance strength and ductility , 2009 .

[14]  Fahim Sadek,et al.  Progressive collapse analysis of seismically designed steel braced frames , 2009 .

[15]  James M. Ricles,et al.  INELASTIC CYCLIC TESTING OF WELDED UNREINFORCED MOMENT CONNECTIONS , 2002 .

[16]  Jinkoo Kim,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of steel buildings subjected to column loss , 2011 .

[17]  Amir Ahmad Hedayat,et al.  Post-Northridge connections with slit dampers to enhance strength and ductility , 2013 .

[18]  Kang Hai Tan,et al.  Experimental tests of different types of bolted steel beam–column joints under a central-column-removal scenario , 2013 .

[19]  Sherif El-Tawil,et al.  Pushdown resistance as a measure of robustness in progressive collapse analysis , 2011 .

[20]  D. T. Pachoumis,et al.  Experimental and FEM analysis of reduced beam section moment endplate connections under cyclic loading , 2014 .

[21]  Sang Whan Han,et al.  Cyclic Performance of Welded Unreinforced Flange-Welded Web Moment Connections , 2014 .