Evidence for simultaneous syntactic processing of multiple words during reading

A hotly debated issue in reading research concerns the extent to which readers process parafoveal words, and how parafoveal information might influence foveal word recognition. We investigated syntactic word processing both in sentence reading and in reading isolated foveal words when these were flanked by parafoveal words. In Experiment 1 we found a syntactic parafoveal preview benefit in sentence reading, meaning that fixation durations on target words were decreased when there was a syntactically congruent preview word at the target location (n) during the fixation on the pre-target (n-1). In Experiment 2 we used a flanker paradigm in which participants had to classify foveal target words as either noun or verb, when those targets were flanked by syntactically congruent or incongruent words (stimulus on-time 170 ms). Lower response times and error rates in the congruent condition suggested that higher-order (syntactic) information can be integrated across foveal and parafoveal words. Although higher-order parafoveal-on-foveal effects have been elusive in sentence reading, results from our flanker paradigm show that the reading system can extract higher-order information from multiple words in a single glance. We propose a model of reading to account for the present findings.

[1]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Parafoveal processing within and between words , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  K. Rayner The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  Seth N. Greenberg,et al.  Allocation of Visuo-Spatial Attention and Saccade Programming During Reading , 2000 .

[4]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  A Theoretical Analysis of the Perceptual Span based on SWIFT Simulations of the n + 2 Boundary Paradigm , 2014, Visual cognition.

[5]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  Trevor Brothers,et al.  Anticipating syntax during reading: Evidence from the boundary change paradigm. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Parafoveal processing in reading , 2011, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[8]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Semantic preview benefit in eye movements during reading: A parafoveal fast-priming study. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. , 2005, Psychological review.

[10]  Sarah J. White,et al.  Reading direction and the central perceptual span: Evidence from Arabic and English , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  E–Z Reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement behavior during reading , 2006, Cognitive Systems Research.

[12]  Eyal M Reingold,et al.  Saccadic inhibition in reading. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  A. Kennedy,et al.  Theoretical perspectives on eye movements in reading: Past controversies, current issues, and an agenda for future research , 2004 .

[14]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Integration of Parafoveal Orthographic Information during Foveal Word Reading: beyond the sub-lexical level? , 2017, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  Sarah J. White,et al.  Reading Direction and the Central Perceptual Span in Urdu and English , 2014, PloS one.

[16]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Semantic preview benefit during reading. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[18]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Parafoveal-foveal overlap can facilitate ongoing word identification during reading: evidence from eye movements. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[20]  G. McConkie,et al.  The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading , 1975 .

[21]  Elizabeth R Schotter,et al.  The effect of contextual constraint on parafoveal processing in reading. , 2015, Journal of memory and language.

[22]  Elizabeth R Schotter,et al.  Synonyms Provide Semantic Preview Benefit in English. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[23]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Tests of a model of multi-word reading: effects of parafoveal flanking letters on foveal word recognition. , 2014, Acta psychologica.

[24]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[25]  Jeremy W. Grabbe,et al.  Age-Related Sparing of Parafoveal Lexical Processing , 2013, Experimental aging research.

[26]  Sharon M. Thomas,et al.  In search of perceptual influences of sentence context on word recognition. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  Wei Zhou,et al.  Lexical and sublexical semantic preview benefits in Chinese reading. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  Sebastiaan Mathôt,et al.  PyGaze: An open-source, cross-platform toolbox for minimal-effort programming of eyetracking experiments , 2014, Behavior research methods.

[29]  John Hale,et al.  Parallel processing and sentence comprehension difficulty , 2011 .

[30]  D. Hung,et al.  Eye movements and parafoveal word processing in reading Chinese , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[31]  Richard Shillcock,et al.  Serial and parallel processing in reading: Investigating the effects of parafoveal orthographic information on nonisolated word recognition , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[32]  J H Flowers,et al.  The effect of flanking context on visual classification: The joint contribution of interactions at different processing levels , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Practice Effects in Large-Scale Visual Word Recognition Studies: A Lexical Decision Study on 14,000 Dutch Mono- and Disyllabic Words and Nonwords , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[34]  Jukka Hyönä,et al.  Do irregular letter combinations attract readers' attention? Evidence from fixation locations in words. , 1995 .

[35]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Morphological parafoveal preview benefit effects in reading: Evidence from Hebrew , 2005 .

[36]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  A test of parafoveal‐on‐foveal effects with pairs of orthographically related words , 2004 .

[37]  Jukka Hyönä,et al.  The interplay between parafoveal preview and morphological Processing in reading , 2007 .

[38]  Sally Andrews,et al.  Parafoveal preview benefit is modulated by the precision of skilled readers' lexical representations. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.