Iterative methods for solving the dual formulation arising from image restoration

Many variational models for image denoising restoration are formulated in primal variables that are directly linked to the solution to be restored. If the total variation related semi-norm is used in the models, one consequence is that extra regularization is needed to remedy the highly non-smooth and oscillatory coefficients for effective numerical solution. The dual formulation was often used to study theoretical properties of a primal formulation. However as a model, this formulation also offers some advantages over the primal formulation in dealing with the above mentioned oscillation and non-smoothness. This paper presents some preliminary work on speeding up the Chambolle method [J. Math. Imaging Vision, 20 (2004), pp. 89–97] for solving the dual formulation. Following a convergence rate analysis of this method, we first show why the nonlinear multigrid method encounters some difficulties in achieving convergence. Then we propose a modified smoother for the multigrid method to enable it to achieve convergence in solving a regularized Chambolle formulation. Finally, we propose a linearized primaldual iterative method as an alternative stand-alone approach to solve the dual formulation without regularization. Numerical results are presented to show that the proposed methods are much faster than the Chambolle method.

[1]  Tony F. Chan,et al.  Image processing and analysis - variational, PDE, wavelet, and stochastic methods , 2005 .

[2]  Pierre Kornprobst,et al.  Mathematical problems in image processing - partial differential equations and the calculus of variations , 2010, Applied mathematical sciences.

[3]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  A Nonlinear Primal-Dual Method for Total Variation-Based Image Restoration , 1999, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[4]  ANTONIN CHAMBOLLE,et al.  An Algorithm for Total Variation Minimization and Applications , 2004, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[5]  Michael K. Ng,et al.  On Semismooth Newton’s Methods for Total Variation Minimization , 2007, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[6]  O. Scherzer,et al.  Non‐stationary iterated Tikhonov–Morozov method and third‐order differential equations for the evaluation of unbounded operators , 2000 .

[7]  D. Brandt,et al.  Multi-level adaptive solutions to boundary-value problems math comptr , 1977 .

[8]  Michael Hintermüller,et al.  An Infeasible Primal-Dual Algorithm for Total Bounded Variation-Based Inf-Convolution-Type Image Restoration , 2006, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[9]  Ke Chen,et al.  On a nonlinear multigrid algorithm with primal relaxation for the image total variation minimisation , 2006, Numerical Algorithms.

[10]  K. Chen,et al.  Matrix preconditioning techniques and applications , 2005 .

[11]  Yves Meyer,et al.  Oscillating Patterns in Image Processing and Nonlinear Evolution Equations: The Fifteenth Dean Jacqueline B. Lewis Memorial Lectures , 2001 .

[12]  Tony F. Chan,et al.  Image processing and analysis , 2005 .

[13]  Ke Chen,et al.  An Optimization-Based Multilevel Algorithm for Total Variation Image Denoising , 2006, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[14]  Ke Chen,et al.  Nonlinear Multilevel Schemes for Solving the Total Variation Image Minimization Problem , 2006 .

[15]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Scale-Space and Edge Detection Using Anisotropic Diffusion , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[16]  L. Rudin,et al.  Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms , 1992 .