Identifying the Locus of Compatibility-Based Backward Crosstalk: Evidence From an Extended PRP Paradigm
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R Gottsdanker,et al. Psychological refractoriness with varying differences between tasks. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.
[2] Wilfried Kunde,et al. Action-effect codes in and before the central bottleneck: evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[3] Steven W. Keele,et al. Attention and human performance , 1973 .
[4] Moritz Durst,et al. “Just do it when you get a chance”: the effects of a background task on primary task performance , 2014, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.
[5] R. Job,et al. The picture-word interference effect is not a Stroop effect , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[6] Jeff Miller,et al. Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: effects of second-task response types on first-task response latencies , 2006, Psychological research.
[7] Wilfried Kunde,et al. The locus of the emotional Stroop effect: a study with the PRP paradigm. , 2014, Acta psychologica.
[8] Andrea M Philipp,et al. Response selection and response execution in task switching: evidence from a go-signal paradigm. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[9] Rolf Ulrich,et al. Late backward effects in the refractory period paradigm: effects of Task 2 execution on Task 1 performance , 2010, Psychological research.
[10] B. Hommel. Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[11] Wilfried Kunde,et al. The locus of tool-transformation costs. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[12] R avid Ell. Working memory involvement in dual-task performance: Evidence from the backward compatibility effect , 2008 .
[13] G. Logan. Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: Theory and data , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.
[14] Wilfried Kunde,et al. Visual and tactile action effects determine bimanual coordination performance. , 2009, Human movement science.
[15] C. Eriksen,et al. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .
[16] Markus Janczyk,et al. Sequential modulation of backward crosstalk and task-shielding in dual-tasking. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[17] H Pashler,et al. Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[18] E. Wagenmakers. A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[19] Rolf Ulrich,et al. Response grouping in the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm: Models and contamination effects , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.
[20] Markus Janczyk,et al. The benefit of no choice: goal-directed plans enhance perceptual processing , 2015, Psychological research.
[21] David E. Kieras,et al. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. , 1997 .
[22] C. W. Telford. The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses , 1931 .
[23] Wilfried Kunde,et al. Goal congruency in bimanual object manipulation. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[24] Eva Röttger,et al. Investigating the characteristics of “not responding”: backward crosstalk in the PRP paradigm with forced vs. free no-go decisions , 2017, Psychological research.
[25] D. Rosenbaum. Human movement initiation: specification of arm, direction, and extent. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[26] Nachshon Meiran,et al. The representation of instructions in working memory leads to autonomous response activation: Evidence from the first trials in the flanker paradigm , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[27] Michael A Khan,et al. The influence of response grouping on free-choice decision making in a response selection task. , 2010, Acta psychologica.
[28] Lynn Huestegge,et al. Effects of a no-go Task 2 on Task 1 performance in dual - tasking: From benefits to costs , 2017, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[29] Rolf Ulrich,et al. Automatic and controlled stimulus processing in conflict tasks: Superimposed diffusion processes and delta functions , 2015, Cognitive Psychology.
[30] G. Logan. Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .
[31] Ann Reynolds,et al. The locus of redundant-targets and nontargets effects: evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[32] G. Logan,et al. Parallel response selection in dual-task situations , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.
[33] Markus Janczyk,et al. Level 2 perspective taking entails two processes: evidence from PRP experiments. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[34] L. Cohen,et al. Synchronous Bimanual Movements Performed by Homologous and Non-Homologous Muscles , 1971, Perceptual and motor skills.
[35] D. Navon,et al. Queuing or Sharing? A Critical Evaluation of the Single-Bottleneck Notion , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.
[36] Gernot Horstmann,et al. The psychological refractory period of stopping. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[37] Torsten Schubert,et al. Effects of extensive dual-task practice on processing stages in simultaneous choice tasks , 2013, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[38] D. Navon,et al. Role of outcome conflict in dual-task interference. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[39] Rolf Ulrich,et al. Decomposing sources of response slowing in the PRP paradigm. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[40] J. C. Johnston,et al. Chronometric Evidence for Central Postponement in Temporally Overlapping Tasks , 2003 .
[41] P. Jolicoeur,et al. A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[42] C. Eriksen,et al. Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[43] Markus Janczyk,et al. Confidence intervals for two sample means: Calculation, interpretation, and a few simple rules , 2013, Advances in cognitive psychology.
[44] Richard Schweickert,et al. A critical path generalization of the additive factor method: Analysis of a stroop task , 1978 .
[45] Torsten Schubert,et al. Response activation in overlapping tasks and the response-selection bottleneck. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[46] Wilfried Kunde,et al. Through the portal: Effect anticipation in the central bottleneck. , 2015, Acta psychologica.
[47] Bernhard Hommel,et al. Anticipatory affect during action preparation: evidence from backward compatibility in dual-task performance , 2017, Cognition & emotion.
[48] Moritz Durst,et al. A comparison of the psychological refractory period and prioritized processing paradigms: Can the response-selection bottleneck model explain them both? , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[49] R. Proctor,et al. Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[50] W. Kunde,et al. Effect Monitoring in Dual-Task Performance , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[51] Michael E J Masson,et al. A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing , 2011, Behavior research methods.
[52] Scott Watter,et al. PRP training shows Task1 response selection is the locus of the backward response compatibility effect , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[53] D. Rosenbaum. The Movement Precuing Technique: Assumptions, Applications, and Extensions , 1983 .
[54] Markus Janczyk,et al. A Common Capacity Limitation for Response and Item Selection in Working Memory , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[55] R. D. de Jong,et al. Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[56] R W Proctor,et al. Multiple spatial correspondence effects on dual-task performance. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[57] Bernhard Hommel,et al. Control of stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance , 2002, Psychological research.
[58] Scott Watter,et al. Information continuity across the response selection bottleneck: Early parallel Task 2 response activation contributes to overt Task 2 performance , 2013, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.
[59] Wilfried Kunde,et al. Who is talking in backward crosstalk? Disentangling response- from goal-conflict in dual-task performance , 2014, Cognition.
[60] H. Pashler. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.
[61] Aishah Bakhtiar,et al. Growing up multitasking: The costs and benefits for cognitive development , 2015 .
[62] Wilfried Kunde,et al. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning , Memory , and Cognition Exceptions to the PRP Effect ? A Comparison of Prepared and Unconditioned Reflexes , 2014 .
[63] Jeff Miller,et al. Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.
[64] Wilfried Kunde,et al. Dorsal and Ventral Processing Under Dual-Task Conditions , 2007, Psychological science.
[65] Rolf Ulrich,et al. Bimanual Response Grouping in Dual-Task Paradigms , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[66] R. D. Gordon,et al. Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. , 2001, Psychological review.
[67] A. Welford. THE ‘PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD’ AND THE TIMING OF HIGH‐SPEED PERFORMANCE—A REVIEW AND A THEORY , 1952 .
[68] Markus Janczyk,et al. Larger between-task crosstalk in children than in adults: Behavioral results from the backward crosstalk paradigm and a diffusion model analysis. , 2017, Journal of experimental child psychology.
[69] Wilfried Kunde,et al. The role of effect grouping in free-choice response selection. , 2014, Acta psychologica.