Mismatch negativity (MMN) to successive deviants within one hierarchically structured auditory object.

The Mismatch Negativity (MMN), a component of the event-related potential (ERP), is elicited by a deviant following a series of standard stimuli. The present study addressed the question whether two deviants occurring successively in one hierarchically organized auditory object would elicit separate MMN responses. An example of such an object is a VC syllable (vowel+consonant). In a passive oddball protocol, the syllables [ɔx] and [ɛʃ] were presented both as standards and deviants so that both phonemes, the vowel and the consonant, changed in the respective deviant. Two negative responses were found in the deviant-minus-standard difference waves. Due to the latencies these effects could not be interpreted as separate MMN responses to the phonemic changes. Instead, the first effect (108ms) was taken as an N1 modulation whereas the second negativity (168ms) was interpreted as an MMN mainly reflecting the change of the initial vowel. Furthermore, the present data were statistically compared with related results from Steinberg et al. (2010a, b) obtained partly from the same stimuli presented in oddball blocks with simple mono-phonemic deviances due to changing vowels. Higher MMN amplitudes were found for the syllable [ɛʃ] in the present data compared to those previous findings. Although this difference was only present for one of the stimulus syllables, it is discussed as a possible indicator of an anticipatory MMN enhancement due to the predictability of the second change in the deviant of the present experiment.

[1]  Martti Vainio,et al.  Modulation of the mismatch negativity (MMN) to vowel duration changes in native speakers of Finnish and German as a result of language experience. , 2007, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[2]  E. Schröger,et al.  Auditory streaming affects the processing of successive deviant and standard sounds. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[3]  I. Winkler Interpreting the Mismatch Negativity , 2007 .

[4]  E. Schröger Measurement and interpretation of the mismatch negativity , 1998 .

[5]  E. Schröger,et al.  Early electrophysiological indicators for predictive processing in audition: a review. , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[6]  N. N. Available World medical association declaration of Helsinki , 2000, Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine.

[7]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Short-term habituation and dishabituation of the mismatch negativity of the ERP. , 1984, Psychophysiology.

[9]  R. Näätänen,et al.  The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  I. Winkler,et al.  The temporal window of integration in elderly and young adults , 2007, Neurobiology of Aging.

[11]  T. Jacobsen,et al.  Activation and application of an obligatory phonotactic constraint in German during automatic speech processing is revealed by human event-related potentials. , 2010, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[12]  I. Winkler,et al.  The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Deviance-repetition effects as a function of stimulus feature, feature value variation, and timing: a mismatch negativity study , 2005, Biological Psychology.

[14]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Human pre-attentive auditory change-detection with single, double, and triple deviations as revealed by mismatch negativity additivity , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[15]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  The additivity of the auditory feature analysis in the human brain as indexed by the mismatch negativity: 1+1≈2 but 1+1+1<3 , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[16]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Pre-attentive perception of vowel phonemes from variable speech stimuli. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[17]  W. Ritter,et al.  Storage of information in transient auditory memory. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[18]  J. Blevins The Syllable in Phonological Theory , 1995 .

[19]  Matthew Gordon,et al.  A cross-linguistic acoustic study of voiceless fricatives , 2002, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[20]  H. Lyytinen,et al.  Automatic and controlled processing of acoustic and phonetic contrasts , 2004, Hearing Research.

[21]  Hubert Truckenbrodt,et al.  Preattentive Phonotactic Processing as Indexed by the Mismatch Negativity , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  Temporal integration of auditory stimulus deviance as reflected by the mismatch negativity , 1999, Neuroscience Letters.

[23]  A. Bregman Auditory Scene Analysis , 2008 .

[24]  I. Winkler,et al.  Auditory processing that leads to conscious perception: a unique window to central auditory processing opened by the mismatch negativity and related responses. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[25]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. , 1978, Acta psychologica.

[26]  A. Lahiri,et al.  Neurobiological Evidence for Abstract Phonological Representations in the Mental Lexicon during Speech Recognition , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  I. Winkler,et al.  Independent processing of changes in auditory single features and feature conjunctions in humans as indexed by the mismatch negativity , 1999, Neuroscience Letters.

[28]  H. Yabe,et al.  Temporal window of integration revealed by MMN to sound omission , 1997, Neuroreport.

[29]  Keith A. Johnson,et al.  Acoustic and Auditory Phonetics , 1997, Phonetica.

[30]  E. Schröger,et al.  Temporal grouping affects the automatic processing of deviant sounds , 2007, Biological Psychology.

[31]  A. Jongman,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.