Performance of Portuguese water utilities: how do ownership, size, diversification and vertical integration relate to efficiency?

This research applies the stochastic frontier analysis benchmarking method to measure the performance of the water sector in Portugal. It estimates a multiproduct translog cost function in order to study the efficiency of the water and sewerage services, using an unbalanced panel comprising 68 Portuguese water utilities for the biennium 2004–2005. The sample is formed by concessionaire companies, municipal companies and semi-autonomous utilities which represent approximately 61% of the Portuguese population, around 6.4 million inhabitants. The water utilities studied have a satisfactory level of efficiency (89% on average). The study points to the assumption that private utilities are, on average, more efficient than public utilities and that there are benefits if the companies specialize in providing a single activity. It also leads to the conclusion that there are increasing economies of scale and decreasing economies of scope associated with the Portuguese water sector.

[1]  Duarte Silva,et al.  Inferência estatística dos estimadores de eficiência obtidos com a técnica fronteira não paramétrica de DEA: Uma metodologia de Bootstrap , 2006 .

[2]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  Flexible Cost Functions for Multiproduct Firms , 1980 .

[3]  R. Marques,et al.  Is big better? On scale and scope economies in the Portuguese water sector , 2011 .

[4]  E. Lynk,et al.  Privatisation, joint production and the comparative efficiencies of private and public ownership: the UK water industry case , 1993 .

[5]  Arnaud Reynaud,et al.  The Impact of Regulation on Cost Efficiency: An Empirical Analysis of Wisconsin Water Utilities , 2005 .

[6]  John K. Ashton.  Cost efficiency in the UK water and sewerage industry , 2000 .

[7]  Rangesan Narayanan,et al.  Specification and estimation of the effect of ownership on the economic efficiency of the water utilities , 1995 .

[8]  Thelma Harumi Ohira,et al.  EFICIÊNCIA ECONÔMICA: UMA APLICAÇÃO DO MODELO DE FRONTEIRA ESTOCÁSTICA EM EMPRESAS DE SANEAMENTO , 2005 .

[9]  David Parker,et al.  State Versus Private Sector Provision of Water Services in Africa: a Statistical, DEA and Stochastic Cost Frontier Analysis , 2006 .

[10]  Massimo Filippini,et al.  The use of a variable cost function in the regulation of the Italian water industry , 2001 .

[11]  A. Estache,et al.  How Different Is the Efficiency of Public and Private Water Companies in Asia , 2002 .

[12]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis , 1997 .

[13]  G. Pink,et al.  Scale and scope efficiencies through hospital consolidations. , 2006, Journal of health economics.

[14]  David Parker,et al.  The impact of privatization and regulation on the water and sewerage industry in England and Wales: a translog cost function model , 2000 .

[15]  Chen Lin,et al.  Service quality and prospects for benchmarking: Evidence from the Peru water sector , 2005 .

[16]  Takuya Urakami,et al.  Identifying network density and scale economies for Japanese water supply organizations , 2001 .

[17]  Lester C. Hunt,et al.  Privatisation and Efficiency in the UK Water Industry: An Empirical Analysis , 2009 .

[18]  Arnaud Reynaud,et al.  Estimating the benefits of efficient water pricing in France , 2004 .

[19]  Massimo Filippini,et al.  Cost efficiency of Slovenian water distribution utilities: an application of stochastic frontier methods , 2008 .

[20]  David S. Saal,et al.  Determining the contribution of technical change, efficiency change and scale change to productivity growth in the privatized English and Welsh water and sewerage industry: 1985–2000 , 2007 .

[21]  A. Estache,et al.  Comparing the performance of public and private water companies in the Asia and Pacific region : what a stochastic costs frontier shows , 1999 .

[22]  A. Bottasso,et al.  Cost Inefficiency in the English and Welsh Water Industry: An Heteroskedastic Stochastic Cost Frontier Approach , 2003 .

[23]  Guillermo Sabbioni,et al.  Efficiency in the Brazilian sanitation sector , 2008 .

[24]  Rangesan Narayanan,et al.  TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF RURAL WATER UTILITIES , 1995 .

[25]  T. Moreira,et al.  Estimating the Relative Efficiency of Brazilian Publicly and Privately Owned Water Utilities: A Stochastic Cost Frontier Approach 1 , 2007 .

[26]  G. Battese,et al.  A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data , 1995 .

[27]  Arnaud Reynaud,et al.  Measuring Economies of Vertical Integration in Network Industries: An Application to the Water Sector , 2007 .

[28]  G. Battese,et al.  Prediction of firm-level technical efficiencies with a generalized frontier production function and panel data , 1988 .

[29]  Antonio Estache,et al.  Sector Organization, Governance, and the Inefficiency of African Water Utilities , 2002 .

[30]  Pedro Simões,et al.  Does the sunshine regulatory approach work?: Governance and regulation model of the urban waste services in Portugal , 2008 .

[31]  T. Moreira,et al.  Public Versus Private Water Utilities: Empirical Evidence for Brazilian Companies , 2005 .

[32]  Giovanni Fraquelli,et al.  Cost Efficiency and Scale Economies in the Italian Water Industry , 2005 .

[33]  Rita Martins,et al.  Cost Structure of the Portuguese Water Industry: a Cubic Cost Function Application , 2006 .

[34]  J. K. Ashton.  Economies of scale and capital utilisation in the English and Welsh water supply industry , 1999 .

[35]  Catherine J. Morrison Paul,et al.  Driving forces for consolidation or fragmentation of the US water utility industry: A cost function approach with endogenous output , 2006 .

[36]  A. U.S.,et al.  FORMULATION AND ESTIMATION OF STOCHASTIC FRONTIER PRODUCTION FUNCTION MODELS , 2001 .

[37]  W. Meeusen,et al.  Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error , 1977 .

[38]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years , 2008 .

[39]  Chen Lin,et al.  Consistency in performance rankings: the Peru water sector , 2008 .

[40]  Silver Mugisha,et al.  Effects of incentive applications on technical efficiencies: Empirical evidence from Ugandan water utilities , 2007 .

[41]  How Natural are Natural Monopolies in the Water Supply and Sewerage Sector? Case Studies from Developing and Transition Economies , 2007 .

[42]  Rui Cunha Marques,et al.  A yardstick competition model for Portuguese water and sewerage services regulation , 2006 .

[43]  Rui Cunha Marques,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) Designing performance incentives , an international benchmark study in the water sector , 2010 .

[44]  Johannes Sauer.  The Efficiency of Rural Infrastructure - Water Supply in Rural Areas of Transition , 2003 .

[45]  Silver Mugisha.  Performance assessment and monitoring of water infrastructure: an empirical case study of benchmarking in Uganda , 2007 .