Evaluation of a new automated quantitative d-dimer, Advanced D-Dimer, in patients suspected of venous thromboembolism

The objective of our study was to evaluate the performance characteristics of a new automated d-dimer, the Advanced D-Dimer (Dade Behring Inc., Deerfield, IL) for use in the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE). To do this we compared the Advanced D-Dimer to existing d-dimer methods using established target cut-off values in patients suspected of VTE who were to undergo definitive radiographic studies for VTE. We studied hospitalized patients and outpatients who were suspected of having VTE and who had whole blood d-dimer performed. The patients who underwent a diagnostic study for VTE had their D-dimer results used to determine sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive values. There was relatively poor correlation between the Advanced D-Dimer and D-Dimer Gold (r = 0.63;t-test:P < 0.005) and Asserachrome D-Di (r = 0.58;t-test:P < 0.005). The Advanced D-Dimer target cutoff values for excluding VTE in hospitalized and outpatients were ⩽ 1800 μg/L and ⩽ 1500 μg/l respectively. There were 139 patients suspected with pulmonary embolism (PE) and 328 evaluated for deep vein thrombosis (DVT). There were 24 patients with PE, and 43 with DVT. The Advanced D-Dimer had comparable sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive values (96, 43, 98% for PE and 96, 48, 99% for DVT respectively) to other d-dimer methods used for that purpose. We conclude that the Advanced D-Dimer correlates relatively poorly with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay methods. This poor correlation is likely due to incorrect reporting units and concentration. When these factors are corrected correlations improved. Compared to existing d-dimer methods used for VTE exclusion, the high sensitivity and negative predictive value would suggest that this method can be used as part of a diagnostic algorithm for the exclusion of PE and DVT.

[1]  J. T. Owings,et al.  A new method for measuring D-dimer using immunoturbidometry: a study of 255 patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis , 2000, Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis.

[2]  Jeffrey S. Ginsberg,et al.  Comparison of a Clinical Probability Estimate and Two Clinical Models in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism , 2000, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[3]  J. Lijmer,et al.  Comparison of a Clinical Probability Estimate and Two Clinical Models in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism , 2000, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[4]  F. Battistella,et al.  Whole blood D-dimer assay: an effective noninvasive method to rule out pulmonary embolism. , 1999, The Journal of trauma.

[5]  M Gent,et al.  Derivation of a Simple Clinical Model to Categorize Patients Probability of Pulmonary Embolism: Increasing the Models Utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer , 2000, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[6]  B A Carroll,et al.  The diagnostic approach to acute venous thromboembolism. Clinical practice guideline. American Thoracic Society. , 1999, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[7]  P. Wells,et al.  Improvements in the Diagnostic Approach for Patients with Suspected Deep Vein Thrombosis or Pulmonary Embolism , 1999, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[8]  M. Nesheim,et al.  The Molecular Weights, Mass Distribution, Chain Composition, and Structure of Soluble Fibrin Degradation Products Released from a Fibrin Clot Perfused with Plasmin* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[9]  D. Slosman,et al.  Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatients , 1999, The Lancet.

[10]  J. Hirsh,et al.  Sensitivity and Specificity of a Rapid Whole-Blood Assay for D-Dimer in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[11]  M Gent,et al.  Use of a Clinical Model for Safe Management of Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[12]  T. Lindahl,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a diagnostic strategy for deep venous thrombosis with exclusion by low plasma levels of fibrin degradation product D-dimer. , 1998, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.

[13]  N. Grenier,et al.  D-dimer Strategy in Thrombosis Exclusion , 1998, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[14]  J. Bertrand,et al.  Evaluation of D-dimer ELISA Test in Elderly Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism , 1998, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[15]  H. Wollersheim,et al.  Reliability of Five Rapid D-Dimer Assays Compared to ELISA in the Exclusion of Deep Venous Thrombosis , 1997, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[16]  C E Floyd,et al.  Improved noninvasive diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism with optimally selected clinical and chest radiographic findings. , 1996, Academic radiology.

[17]  P. de Moerloose,et al.  Contribution of a New, Rapid, Individual and Quantitative Automated D-Dimer ELISA to Exclude Pulmonary Embolism , 1996, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[18]  B. Risberg,et al.  Can laboratory testing improve screening strategies for deep vein thrombosis at an emergency unit? , 1994, Journal of internal medicine.