Behavioral impact of graduated driver licensing on teenage driving risk and exposure.

Graduated driver licensing (GDL) is a critical policy tool for potentially improving teenage driving while reducing teen accident exposure. While previous studies demonstrated that GDL reduces teenage involvement in fatal crashes, much remains unanswered. We explore the mechanisms through which GDL influences accident rates as well as its long term effectiveness on teen driving. In particular, we investigate: (1) whether GDL policies improve teenage driving behavior, or simply reduce teenage prevalence on the roads; (2) whether GDL exposed teens become better drivers in later years. We employ a unique data source, the State Data System, which contains all police reported accidents (fatal and non-fatal) during 1990-2005 for 12 states. We estimate a structural model that separately identifies GDL's effect on relative teenage prevalence and relative teenage riskiness. Identification of the model is driven by the relative numbers of crashes between two teenagers, two adults, or a teenager and an adult. We find that the GDL policies reduce the number of 15-17-year-old accidents by limiting the amount of teenage driving rather than by improving teenage driving. This prevalence reduction primarily occurs at night and stricter GDL policies, especially those with night-time driving restrictions, are the most effective. Finally, we find that teen driving quality does not improve ex post GDL exposure.

[1]  J. Giedd Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Adolescent Brain , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[2]  B A Jonah,et al.  Accident risk and risk-taking behaviour among young drivers. , 1986, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  D. Eisenberg Evaluating the effectiveness of policies related to drunk driving , 2003 .

[4]  Susan Pardee Baker,et al.  Nationwide Review of Graduated Driver Licensing , 2007 .

[5]  Susan P. Baker,et al.  Graduated Driver Licensing Programs and Fatal Crashes of 16-Year-Old Drivers: A National Evaluation , 2006, Pediatrics.

[6]  J. Andrey,et al.  The situational risks of young drivers: the influence of passengers, time of day and day of week on accident rates. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Pinar Karaca-Mandic,et al.  The Accident Externality from Driving , 2005, Journal of Political Economy.

[8]  Allan F Williams,et al.  Teenage drivers: patterns of risk. , 2003, Journal of safety research.

[9]  A F Williams,et al.  The effect of teenage passengers on the fatal crash risk of teenage drivers. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Brian A. Jonah,et al.  Youth and risk: age differences in risky driving, risk perception, and risk utility , 1987 .

[11]  J D Langley,et al.  Adolescent injury morbidity in New Zealand, 1987–96 , 2002, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[12]  James Hedlund,et al.  Novice teen driving: GDL and beyond. , 2007, Journal of safety research.

[13]  Jean T Shope,et al.  Graduated driver licensing: review of evaluation results since 2002. , 2007, Journal of safety research.

[14]  William N. Evans,et al.  Behavior Policies and Teen Traffic Safety , 2001 .

[15]  R D Foss,et al.  Effectiveness of graduated driver licensing in reducing motor vehicle crashes. , 1999, American journal of preventive medicine.

[16]  B G Simons-Morton,et al.  Promoting parental management of teen driving , 2002, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[17]  J T Shope,et al.  Graduated driver licensing in Michigan: early impact on motor vehicle crashes among 16-year-old drivers. , 2001, JAMA.

[18]  Terry L. Schell,et al.  Predicting DUI recidivism: Personality, attitudinal, and behavioral risk factors. , 2006, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[19]  Christopher S. Carpenter,et al.  How do Zero Tolerance Drunk Driving Laws work? , 2004, Journal of health economics.

[20]  E R Braver,et al.  Carrying passengers as a risk factor for crashes fatal to 16- and 17-year-old drivers. , 2000, JAMA.

[21]  K. Ambrose,et al.  INJURY PREVENTION , 1996, Orthopedic nursing.

[22]  A I Reeder,et al.  The New Zealand graduated driver licensing system: teenagers' attitudes towards and experiences with this car driver licensing system. , 1995, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[23]  E. Duflo,et al.  How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates? , 2001 .

[24]  R C Peck,et al.  Graduated driver licensing: what works? , 2002, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[25]  David C Grabowski,et al.  The strength of graduated drivers license programs and fatalities among teen drivers and passengers. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  David F. Preusser,et al.  Crash involvements of 16-year-old drivers , 1997 .

[28]  Kenneth H Beck,et al.  Teen Driving Risk: The Promise of Parental Influence and Public Policy , 2002, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[29]  Jessica L. Hartos,et al.  Do Parent-Imposed Delayed Licensure and Restricted Driving Reduce Risky Driving Behaviors Among Newly Licensed Teens? , 2001, Prevention Science.

[30]  N J Chetta,et al.  Alcohol, drugs and driving. , 1967, The Journal of the Louisiana State Medical Society : official organ of the Louisiana State Medical Society.

[31]  E A Rodgman,et al.  Initial effects of graduated driver licensing on 16-year-old driver crashes in North Carolina. , 2001, JAMA.

[32]  David C Grabowski,et al.  Graduated driver licensing and teen traffic fatalities. , 2005, Journal of health economics.

[33]  Steven D. Levitt,et al.  How Dangerous Are Drinking Drivers? , 2001, Journal of Political Economy.