Mechanical torque measurement predicts load to implant cut-out: a biomechanical study investigating DHS® anchorage in femoral heads

IntroductionBone strength plays an important role in implant anchorage. Bone mineral density (BMD) is used as surrogate parameter to quantify bone strength and to predict implant anchorage. BMD can be measured by means of quantitative computer tomography (QCT) or dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). These noninvasive methods for BMD measurement are not available pre- or intra-operatively. Instead, the surgeon could determine bone strength by direct mechanical measurement. We have evaluated mechanical torque measurement for (A) its capability to quantify local bone strength and (B) its predictive value towards load at implant cut-out.Materials and methodsOur experimental study was performed using sixteen paired human cadaver proximal femurs. BMD was determined for all specimens by QCT. The torque to breakaway of the cancellous bone structure (peak torque) was measured by means of a mechanical probe at the exact position of subsequent DHS® placement. The fixation strength of the DHS® achieved was assessed by cyclic loading in a stepwise protocol beginning with 1,500 N increasing 500 N every 5,000 cycles until 4,000 N.ResultsA highly significant correlation of peak torque with BMD (QCT) was found (r = 0.902, r2 = 0.814, P < 0.001). Peak torque correlated highly significant with the load at implant cut-out (r = 0.795, P < 0.001). All specimens with a measured peak torque below 6.79 Nm failed at the first load level of 1,500 N. The specimens with a peak torque above 8.63 Nm survived until the last load level of 4,000 N.ConclusionMechanical peak torque measurement is able to quantify bone strength. In an experimental setup, peak torque identifies those specimens that are likely to fail at low load. In clinical routine, implant migration and cut-out depend on several parameters, which are difficult to control, such as fracture type, fracture reduction achieved, and implant position. The predictive value of peak torque towards cut-out in a clinical set-up therefore has to be carefully validated.

[1]  D N Kunz,et al.  Pedicle Screw Pullout Strength: Correlation with Insertional Torque , 1993, Spine.

[2]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  H. An,et al.  Strength of anterior vertebral screw fixation in relationship to bone mineral density. , 1995, Journal of spinal disorders.

[4]  R Barmada,et al.  The effect of adjunctive methylmethacrylate on failures of fixation and function in patients with intertrochanteric fractures and osteoporosis. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  A Horsman,et al.  Intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Mechanical failure after internal fixation. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[6]  J. Stürup,et al.  Screw fixation in the femoral head. Pull-out tests in cadavers. , 1988, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[7]  K Okuyama,et al.  Stability of transpedicle screwing for the osteoporotic spine. An in vitro study of the mechanical stability. , 1993, Spine.

[8]  A. Tencer,et al.  Predicting the mechanical outcome of femoral neck fractures fixed with cancellous screws: an in vivo study. , 1998, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[9]  奥山 幸一郎,et al.  Stability of transpedicle screwing for the osteoporotic spine , 1994 .

[10]  C. Barrios,et al.  Healing Complications After Internal Fixation of Trochanteric Hip Fractures: The Prognostic Value of Osteoporosis , 1993, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[11]  L. S. Matthews,et al.  Proximal femoral bone density and its correlation to fracture load and hip-screw penetration load. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  D. Lorich,et al.  Osteoporotic pertrochanteric hip fractures: management and current controversies. , 2004, Instructional course lectures.

[13]  T. Ryken,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of bone mineral density, insertion technique, screw torque, and holding strength of anterior cervical plate screws. , 1995, Journal of neurosurgery.

[14]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  David W. Bates,et al.  CLINICAL USE OF BONE DENSITOMETRY , 1991 .

[16]  K. Okuyama,et al.  Can insertional torque predict screw loosening and related failures? An in vivo study of pedicle screw fixation augmenting posterior lumbar interbody fusion. , 2000, Spine.

[17]  S. Ohtori,et al.  Insertional torque of the lumbar pedicle screw during surgery , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[18]  C. Reitman,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Relationship of Screw Pullout Strength, Insertional Torque, and Bone Mineral Density in the Cervical Spine , 2004, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.