Semantic Richness Effects in Spoken Word Recognition: A Lexical Decision and Semantic Categorization Megastudy

A large number of studies have demonstrated that semantic richness dimensions [e.g., number of features, semantic neighborhood density, semantic diversity , concreteness, emotional valence] influence word recognition processes. Some of these richness effects appear to be task-general, while others have been found to vary across tasks. Importantly, almost all of these findings have been found in the visual word recognition literature. To address this gap, we examined the extent to which these semantic richness effects are also found in spoken word recognition, using a megastudy approach that allows for an examination of the relative contribution of the various semantic properties to performance in two tasks: lexical decision, and semantic categorization. The results show that concreteness, valence, and number of features accounted for unique variance in latencies across both tasks in a similar direction—faster responses for spoken words that were concrete, emotionally valenced, and with a high number of features—while arousal, semantic neighborhood density, and semantic diversity did not influence latencies. Implications for spoken word recognition processes are discussed.

[1]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  J. Adelman,et al.  Automatic vigilance for negative words in lexical decision and naming: comment on Larsen, Mercer, and Balota (2006). , 2008, Emotion.

[3]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[5]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Speech Perception and Spoken Word Recognition: Research and Theory , 2008 .

[6]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Modulation of additive and interactive effects in lexical decision by trial history. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Wuggy: A multilingual pseudoword generator , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[8]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[9]  Yasushi Hino,et al.  The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition: Number-of-features effects in lexical decision and naming tasks , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  Amy Beth Warriner,et al.  Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas , 2013, Behavior Research Methods.

[11]  David A Balota,et al.  Lexical characteristics of words used in emotional Stroop experiments. , 2006, Emotion.

[12]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Integrating Form and Meaning: A Distributed Model of Speech Perception. , 1997 .

[13]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Does Word Identification Proceed From Spelling to Sound to Meaning , 1991 .

[14]  Amy Beth Warriner,et al.  Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas , 2014, Behavior research methods.

[15]  Penny M. Pexman,et al.  Introduction to the research topic meaning in mind: semantic richness effects in language processing , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[16]  S. Andrews The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts , 1997 .

[17]  G. Stone,et al.  Strategic control of processing in word recognition. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  D. Balota,et al.  Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: implications for group differences in response latency. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  Lidia Suárez,et al.  Observing neighborhood effects without neighbors , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  P. Pexman,et al.  Number-of-features effects and semantic processing , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[21]  James S. Magnuson,et al.  The Impact of Semantic Neighborhood Density on Semantic Access , 2006 .

[22]  J. Grainger,et al.  Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: cross-task comparisons. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[24]  M. Vitevitch The spread of the phonological neighborhood influences spoken word recognition , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[25]  L. Tyler,et al.  The interaction of meaning and sound in spoken word recognition , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[27]  M. Bradley,et al.  Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW): Instruction Manual and Affective Ratings , 1999 .

[28]  Melvin J Yap,et al.  Semantic richness effects in lexical decision: The role of feedback , 2015, Memory & cognition.

[29]  Mark J. Huff,et al.  An Abundance of Riches: Cross-Task Comparisons of Semantic Richness Effects in Visual Word Recognition , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[30]  Sally Andrews,et al.  Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? , 1992 .

[31]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[32]  Maarten Casteren,et al.  Match: A program to assist in matching the conditions of factorial experiments , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[33]  D. Mirman,et al.  Competition and cooperation among similar representations: toward a unified account of facilitative and inhibitory effects of lexical neighbors. , 2012, Psychological review.

[34]  Ian S. Hargreaves,et al.  Is more always better? Effects of semantic richness on lexical decision, speeded pronunciation, and semantic classification , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[35]  Lidia Suárez,et al.  Distributional analyses in auditory lexical decision: Neighborhood density and word-frequency effects , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[36]  Amy Beth Warriner,et al.  Emotion and language: valence and arousal affect word recognition. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[37]  Curt Burgess,et al.  Characterizing semantic space: Neighborhood effects in word recognition , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[38]  P. Brockhoff,et al.  lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (lmer objects of lme4 package) , 2014 .

[39]  C. Connine,et al.  Semantic richness: The role of semantic features in processing spoken words , 2014 .

[40]  P. Luce,et al.  A computational analysis of uniqueness points in auditory word recognition , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  Cynthia S. Q. Siew,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning , Memory , and Cognition Spoken Word Recognition and Serial Recall of Words From Components in the Phonological Network , 2015 .

[42]  D Norris,et al.  Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[43]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Spoken-word recognition , 1995 .

[44]  Cyrus Shaoul,et al.  Exploring lexical co-occurrence space using HiDEx , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[45]  D. Balota,et al.  Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words , 2009 .

[46]  M. Vitevitch,et al.  The influence of the phonological neighborhood clustering coefficient on spoken word recognition. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[48]  Melvin J Yap,et al.  The Calgary semantic decision project: concrete/abstract decision data for 10,000 English words , 2016, Behavior Research Methods.

[49]  G. Vigliocco,et al.  Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words , 2009, Cognition.

[50]  S. Andrews Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? , 1989 .

[51]  J. Ziegler,et al.  Neighborhood effects in auditory word recognition: Phonological competition and orthographic facilitation. , 2003 .

[52]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[53]  P. Schwanenflugel Why are Abstract Concepts Hard to Understand , 2013 .

[54]  R. Clark,et al.  Competition and Cooperation , 2004 .

[55]  Ian S. Hargreaves,et al.  There are many ways to be rich: Effects of three measures of semantic richness on visual word recognition , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[56]  T. Rogers,et al.  Semantic diversity: A measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.

[57]  J. Russell A circumplex model of affect. , 1980 .

[58]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.