Semantic Richness Effects in Spoken Word Recognition: A Lexical Decision and Semantic Categorization Megastudy
暂无分享,去创建一个
Melvin J. Yap | Winston D. Goh | M. Yap | Luuan-Chin Tan | Melvin Ng | Mabel C. Lau | Melvin M. R. Ng | Luuan-Chin Tan | Mabel Lau
[1] James L. McClelland,et al. The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.
[2] J. Adelman,et al. Automatic vigilance for negative words in lexical decision and naming: comment on Larsen, Mercer, and Balota (2006). , 2008, Emotion.
[3] M. Nissen,et al. Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.
[4] R Core Team,et al. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .
[5] D. Pisoni,et al. Speech Perception and Spoken Word Recognition: Research and Theory , 2008 .
[6] Reinhold Kliegl,et al. Modulation of additive and interactive effects in lexical decision by trial history. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[7] Marc Brysbaert,et al. Wuggy: A multilingual pseudoword generator , 2010, Behavior research methods.
[8] D. Pisoni,et al. Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model , 1998, Ear and hearing.
[9] Yasushi Hino,et al. The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition: Number-of-features effects in lexical decision and naming tasks , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[10] Amy Beth Warriner,et al. Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas , 2013, Behavior Research Methods.
[11] David A Balota,et al. Lexical characteristics of words used in emotional Stroop experiments. , 2006, Emotion.
[12] William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al. Integrating Form and Meaning: A Distributed Model of Speech Perception. , 1997 .
[13] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. Does Word Identification Proceed From Spelling to Sound to Meaning , 1991 .
[14] Amy Beth Warriner,et al. Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas , 2014, Behavior research methods.
[15] Penny M. Pexman,et al. Introduction to the research topic meaning in mind: semantic richness effects in language processing , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[16] S. Andrews. The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts , 1997 .
[17] G. Stone,et al. Strategic control of processing in word recognition. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[18] D. Balota,et al. Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: implications for group differences in response latency. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.
[19] Lidia Suárez,et al. Observing neighborhood effects without neighbors , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[20] P. Pexman,et al. Number-of-features effects and semantic processing , 2003, Memory & cognition.
[21] James S. Magnuson,et al. The Impact of Semantic Neighborhood Density on Semantic Access , 2006 .
[22] J. Grainger,et al. Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: cross-task comparisons. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[23] Michael J Cortese,et al. Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[24] M. Vitevitch. The spread of the phonological neighborhood influences spoken word recognition , 2007, Memory & cognition.
[25] L. Tyler,et al. The interaction of meaning and sound in spoken word recognition , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[26] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things , 2005, Behavior research methods.
[27] M. Bradley,et al. Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW): Instruction Manual and Affective Ratings , 1999 .
[28] Melvin J Yap,et al. Semantic richness effects in lexical decision: The role of feedback , 2015, Memory & cognition.
[29] Mark J. Huff,et al. An Abundance of Riches: Cross-Task Comparisons of Semantic Richness Effects in Visual Word Recognition , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[30] Sally Andrews,et al. Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? , 1992 .
[31] Rebecca Treiman,et al. The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.
[32] Maarten Casteren,et al. Match: A program to assist in matching the conditions of factorial experiments , 2007, Behavior research methods.
[33] D. Mirman,et al. Competition and cooperation among similar representations: toward a unified account of facilitative and inhibitory effects of lexical neighbors. , 2012, Psychological review.
[34] Ian S. Hargreaves,et al. Is more always better? Effects of semantic richness on lexical decision, speeded pronunciation, and semantic classification , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[35] Lidia Suárez,et al. Distributional analyses in auditory lexical decision: Neighborhood density and word-frequency effects , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[36] Amy Beth Warriner,et al. Emotion and language: valence and arousal affect word recognition. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[37] Curt Burgess,et al. Characterizing semantic space: Neighborhood effects in word recognition , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[38] P. Brockhoff,et al. lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (lmer objects of lme4 package) , 2014 .
[39] C. Connine,et al. Semantic richness: The role of semantic features in processing spoken words , 2014 .
[40] P. Luce,et al. A computational analysis of uniqueness points in auditory word recognition , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.
[41] Cynthia S. Q. Siew,et al. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning , Memory , and Cognition Spoken Word Recognition and Serial Recall of Words From Components in the Phonological Network , 2015 .
[42] D Norris,et al. Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[43] Anne Cutler,et al. Spoken-word recognition , 1995 .
[44] Cyrus Shaoul,et al. Exploring lexical co-occurrence space using HiDEx , 2010, Behavior research methods.
[45] D. Balota,et al. Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words , 2009 .
[46] M. Vitevitch,et al. The influence of the phonological neighborhood clustering coefficient on spoken word recognition. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[47] Marc Brysbaert,et al. Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English , 2009, Behavior research methods.
[48] Melvin J Yap,et al. The Calgary semantic decision project: concrete/abstract decision data for 10,000 English words , 2016, Behavior Research Methods.
[49] G. Vigliocco,et al. Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words , 2009, Cognition.
[50] S. Andrews. Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? , 1989 .
[51] J. Ziegler,et al. Neighborhood effects in auditory word recognition: Phonological competition and orthographic facilitation. , 2003 .
[52] Duncan J. Watts,et al. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.
[53] P. Schwanenflugel. Why are Abstract Concepts Hard to Understand , 2013 .
[54] R. Clark,et al. Competition and Cooperation , 2004 .
[55] Ian S. Hargreaves,et al. There are many ways to be rich: Effects of three measures of semantic richness on visual word recognition , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[56] T. Rogers,et al. Semantic diversity: A measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.
[57] J. Russell. A circumplex model of affect. , 1980 .
[58] D. Bates,et al. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.