The Semantic Basis of Control in English

Our intent here,in the face of a persistent tradition of studying control in purely syntactic terms,is to reiterate the fundamental importance of semantics in the control problem, and to articulate some of the semantic factors more precisely than has heretofore been possible. After presenting familiar obstacles to a theory of control based on syntactic binding,we make a threeway distinction between 'unique control' (usually called OBLIGATORY CONTROL),'free control', and 'nearly free control' (the last two falling under traditional NONOBLIGATORY CONTROL). We show that in a very large class of cases of unique control,the controlled VP denotes an action and the controller is the character who has the onus for that action. This analysis is applied to four major classes of control verbs and their nominals,as well as a class of adjectives,showing that semantic role reliably identifies the controller,and syntactic position does not. Through a formalization in terms of CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURE,we begin to be able to explain much of control directly from the lexical decomposition of the matrix verb. Several classes of exceptions to the conditions on unique control are treated as cases of coercion,in which extra conventionalized semantic material is added that is not present in syntax.*

[1]  Z. Harris,et al.  Foundations of Language , 1940 .

[2]  R. Jackendoff,et al.  Control Is Not Movement , 2001, Linguistic Inquiry.

[3]  Hiroyuki Takagi.  ON SO-CALLED'OBLIGATORY CONTROL':A COGNITIVE ACCOUNT , 2001 .

[4]  Mary Dalrymple,et al.  12: Functional And Anaphoric Control , 2001 .

[5]  Susanne Wurmbrand,et al.  Infinitives: Restructuring and Clause Structure , 2001 .

[6]  Edgar A. Whitley,et al.  The Construction of Social Reality , 1999 .

[7]  Malka Rappaport Hovav,et al.  Two Structures for Compositionally Derived Events , 1999 .

[8]  Ray Jackendoff.  The natural logic of rights and obligations. , 1999 .

[9]  R. Jackendoff,et al.  Language, Logic, and Concepts Essays in Memory of John Macnamara , 1999 .

[10]  I. Landau.  Elements of control : structure and meaning in infinitival constructions , 1999 .

[11]  Rudolf Růžička.  Control in grammar and pragmatics , 1999 .

[12]  Peter W. Culicover,et al.  Syntactic Nuts: Hard Cases, Syntactic Theory, and Language Acquisition , 1999 .

[13]  N. Hornstein.  Movement and Control , 1999, Linguistic Inquiry.

[14]  Randy J. LaPolla,et al.  Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function , 1999 .

[15]  P. Culicover.  Semantic subordination despite syntactic coordination , 1997 .

[16]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  The Architecture of the Language Faculty , 1996 .

[17]  Peter W. Culicover.  'Something else' for the binding theory , 1995 .

[18]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Book Reviews: Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and German in Head-driven Phrase-structure Grammar , 1996, CL.

[19]  A. Newell.  On Declarative Sentences , 1994 .

[20]  R. Jackendoff.  MME. Tussaud meets the binding theory , 1992 .

[21]  J. Higginbotham,et al.  Control and Grammar , 1992 .

[22]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  The Generative Lexicon , 1995, CL.

[23]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  An Integrated Theory of Complement Control. , 1991 .

[24]  R. Larson.  'Promise' and the theory of control , 1991 .

[25]  Ann A. Copestake,et al.  Enjoy the paper: lexical semantics via lexicology , 1990, COLING 1990.

[26]  Gennaro Chierchia,et al.  Structured Meanings, Thematic Roles and Control , 1989 .

[27]  David R. Dowty,et al.  Toward a Nongrammatical Account of Thematic Roles , 1988 .

[28]  C. Fillmore,et al.  Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone , 1988 .

[29]  Donka F. Farkas,et al.  On obligatory control , 1988 .

[30]  Michael E. Bratman,et al.  Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason , 1991 .

[31]  Wendy K. Wilkins,et al.  Control, PRO, and the Projection Principle , 1986 .

[32]  M. Baltin,et al.  The Mental representation of grammatical relations , 1985 .

[33]  Edwin Williams,et al.  PRO and subject of NP , 1985 .

[34]  David R. Dowty.  On recent analyses of the semantics of control , 1985 .

[35]  Ewan Klein,et al.  Type-driven translation , 1985 .

[36]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  Believing and intending: two sides of the same coin , 1985 .

[37]  Taisuke Nishigauchi,et al.  Control and the Thematic Domain , 1984 .

[38]  Francesco Orilia,et al.  Semantics and Cognition , 1991 .

[39]  A. Akmajian,et al.  An Encyclopedia of AUX: A Study in Cross-Linguistic Equivalence , 1981 .

[40]  J. Bowers.  The Theory of Grammatical Relations , 1981 .

[41]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[42]  Frederick J. Newmeyer,et al.  Linguistic Theory In America , 1980 .

[43]  Emmon W. Bach,et al.  Control in Montague Grammar , 1979 .

[44]  William R. Cantrall,et al.  Viewpoint, reflexives, and the nature of noun phrases , 1974 .

[45]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar , 1972 .

[46]  David M. Perlmutter.  Deep and surface structure constraints in syntax , 1973 .

[47]  George Lakoff,et al.  Irregularity In Syntax , 1970 .

[48]  Carol Chomsky,et al.  The Acquisition of syntax in children from 5 to 10 / Carol homsky , 1971 .

[49]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  Some rules of semantic interpretation for English , 1969 .

[50]  Peter Steven Rosenbaum,et al.  The grammar of English predicate complement constructions , 1967 .

[51]  Z. Harris,et al.  Foundations of Language , 1940 .