Reprogramming cell fates: reconciling rarity with robustness

The stunning possibility of “reprogramming” differentiated somatic cells to express a pluripotent stem cell phenotype (iPS, induced pluripotent stem cell) and the “ground state” character of pluripotency reveal fundamental features of cell fate regulation that lie beyond existing paradigms. The rarity of reprogramming events appears to contradict the robustness with which the unfathomably complex phenotype of stem cells can reliably be generated. This apparent paradox, however, is naturally explained by the rugged “epigenetic landscape” with valleys representing “preprogrammed” attractor states that emerge from the dynamical constraints of the gene regulatory network. This article provides a pedagogical primer to the fundamental principles of gene regulatory networks as integrated dynamic systems and reviews recent insights in gene expression noise and fate determination, thereby offering a formal framework that may help us to understand why cell fate reprogramming events are inherently rare and yet so robust.

[1]  N. Tinbergen "Derived" Activities; Their Causation, Biological Significance, Origin, and Emancipation During Evolution , 1952, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[2]  S. Counce The Strategy of the Genes , 1958, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[3]  J. Monod,et al.  Teleonomic mechanisms in cellular metabolism, growth, and differentiation. , 1961, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[4]  S. Kauffman Homeostasis and Differentiation in Random Genetic Control Networks , 1969, Nature.

[5]  Helmut Gernsheim,et al.  W. H. Fox Talbot and the history of photography , 1977 .

[6]  R. Thomas,et al.  Logical analysis of systems comprising feedback loops. , 1978, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  G. Nicolis,et al.  Dissipative systems , 1986 .

[8]  T. Maniatis,et al.  Regulation of inducible and tissue-specific gene expression. , 1987, Science.

[9]  P. Wolynes,et al.  The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. , 1991, Science.

[10]  T. M. Dexter,et al.  Suppression of apoptosis allows differentiation and development of a multipotent hemopoietic cell line in the absence of added growth factors , 1993, Cell.

[11]  R. White,et al.  Mosaic methylation in clonal tissue. , 1993, Developmental biology.

[12]  R. Hass Retrodifferentiation and cell death. , 1994, Critical reviews in oncogenesis.

[13]  G. Keller,et al.  In vitro differentiation of embryonic stem cells. , 1995, Current opinion in cell biology.

[14]  M. Pascual Understanding nonlinear dynamics , 1996 .

[15]  M. Greaves,et al.  Multilineage gene expression precedes commitment in the hemopoietic system. , 1997, Genes & development.

[16]  Seth Krantz,et al.  Discussion , 1998, Neuroscience.

[17]  T. Enver,et al.  Do stem cells play dice? , 1998, Blood.

[18]  M. Greaves,et al.  Loops, Lineage, and Leukemia , 1998, Cell.

[19]  S. Huang,et al.  Shape-dependent control of cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis: switching between attractors in cell regulatory networks. , 2000, Experimental cell research.

[20]  E. Querfurth,et al.  Antagonism between C/EBPbeta and FOG in eosinophil lineage commitment of multipotent hematopoietic progenitors. , 2000, Genes & development.

[21]  M. Kloc,et al.  Chromatin elimination--an oddity or a common mechanism in differentiation and development? , 2001, Differentiation; research in biological diversity.

[22]  T. Enver,et al.  Plasticity revisited. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[23]  T. Graf Differentiation plasticity of hematopoietic cells. , 2002, Blood.

[24]  Wendy Dean,et al.  Epigenetic reprogramming: Back to the beginning , 2002, Nature.

[25]  Hidde de Jong,et al.  Modeling and Simulation of Genetic Regulatory Systems: A Literature Review , 2002, J. Comput. Biol..

[26]  K. Akashi,et al.  GATA-1 converts lymphoid and myelomonocytic progenitors into the megakaryocyte/erythrocyte lineages. , 2003, Immunity.

[27]  S. Watt,et al.  Stem cell plasticity , 2003, British journal of haematology.

[28]  Jing Wu,et al.  GATA-1-dependent transcriptional repression of GATA-2 via disruption of positive autoregulation and domain-wide chromatin remodeling , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Xi C. He,et al.  Transcriptional accessibility for genes of multiple tissues and hematopoietic lineages is hierarchically controlled during early hematopoiesis. , 2003, Blood.

[30]  Gretchen Vogel,et al.  Stem cells. 'Stemness' genes still elusive. , 2003, Science.

[31]  Sui Huang,et al.  Gene Expression Dynamics Inspector (GEDI): for integrative analysis of expression profiles , 2003, Bioinform..

[32]  Gretchen Vogel,et al.  'Stemness' Genes Still Elusive , 2003, Science.

[33]  M. Raff Adult stem cell plasticity: fact or artifact? , 2003, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[34]  Stefan Kubicek,et al.  A Crack in Histone Lysine Methylation , 2004, Cell.

[35]  Emilie Marcus A New Year and a New Era for Cell , 2004, Cell.

[36]  B. Frey,et al.  The functional landscape of mouse gene expression , 2004, Journal of biology.

[37]  S. Khorasanizadeh The Nucleosome From Genomic Organization to Genomic Regulation , 2004, Cell.

[38]  Fraser McBlane,et al.  Molecular Signatures of Self-Renewal, Differentiation, and Lineage Choice in Multipotential Hemopoietic Progenitor Cells In Vitro , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[39]  S. Batalov,et al.  A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  A. Fisher,et al.  Epigenetic aspects of differentiation , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[41]  D. Tosh,et al.  The molecular basis of transdifferentiation , 2005, Journal of cellular and molecular medicine.

[42]  S. Tapscott,et al.  MyoD Targets Chromatin Remodeling Complexes to the Myogenin Locus Prior to Forming a Stable DNA-Bound Complex , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[43]  J. Rossant,et al.  Genetic regulation of stem cell origins in the mouse embryo , 2005, Clinical genetics.

[44]  T. Elston,et al.  Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[45]  Hannah H. Chang,et al.  Multistable and multistep dynamics in neutrophil differentiation , 2006, BMC Cell Biology.

[46]  François Fuks,et al.  DNA methylation and histone modifications: teaming up to silence genes. , 2005, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[47]  Constanze Bonifer,et al.  Epigenetic Plasticity of Hematopoietic Cells , 2005, Cell cycle.

[48]  Megan F. Cole,et al.  Core Transcriptional Regulatory Circuitry in Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2005, Cell.

[49]  Gabriel S. Eichler,et al.  Cell fates as high-dimensional attractor states of a complex gene regulatory network. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[50]  S. Tapscott,et al.  The circuitry of a master switch: Myod and the regulation of skeletal muscle gene transcription , 2005, Development.

[51]  Danny Reinberg,et al.  Histone Lysine Demethylases and Their Impact on Epigenetics , 2006, Cell.

[52]  E. Richards Inherited epigenetic variation — revisiting soft inheritance , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[53]  Kunihiko Kaneko,et al.  Morphogenesis, plasticity and irreversibility. , 2006, The International journal of developmental biology.

[54]  Rudolf Jaenisch,et al.  Nuclear reprogramming and pluripotency , 2006, Nature.

[55]  T. Graf,et al.  Determinants of lymphoid-myeloid lineage diversification. , 2006, Annual review of immunology.

[56]  Ingo Roeder,et al.  Towards an understanding of lineage specification in hematopoietic stem cells: a mathematical model for the interaction of transcription factors GATA-1 and PU.1. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[57]  Nicola K. Wilson,et al.  A Two-Step, PU.1-Dependent Mechanism for Developmentally Regulated Chromatin Remodeling and Transcription of the c-fms Gene , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[58]  J. Mellor,et al.  Dynamic nucleosomes and gene transcription. , 2006, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[59]  X. Chen,et al.  The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[60]  R. Schüle,et al.  Histone demethylation and androgen-dependent transcription. , 2006, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[61]  Kit T. Rodolfa,et al.  A Transcriptional Logic for Nuclear Reprogramming , 2006, Cell.

[62]  P. Lásló,et al.  Multilineage Transcriptional Priming and Determination of Alternate Hematopoietic Cell Fates , 2006, Cell.

[63]  T. Graf,et al.  Reprogramming of committed T cell progenitors to macrophages and dendritic cells by C/EBP alpha and PU.1 transcription factors. , 2006, Immunity.

[64]  Carsten Peterson,et al.  Transcriptional Dynamics of the Embryonic Stem Cell Switch , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[65]  D. Tenen,et al.  Site-specific DNA methylation by a complex of PU.1 and Dnmt3a/b , 2006, Oncogene.

[66]  Sui Huang,et al.  Bifurcation dynamics in lineage-commitment in bipotent progenitor cells. , 2007, Developmental biology.

[67]  T. Kouzarides Chromatin Modifications and Their Function , 2007, Cell.

[68]  C. Allis,et al.  Epigenetics: A Landscape Takes Shape , 2007, Cell.

[69]  Takashi Hiiragi,et al.  Stochastic patterning in the mouse pre-implantation embryo , 2007, Development.

[70]  C. Murre Defining the pathways of early adult hematopoiesis. , 2007, Cell stem cell.

[71]  Jin Wang,et al.  Potential Energy Landscape and Robustness of a Gene Regulatory Network: Toggle Switch , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[72]  T. Ichisaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Adult Human Fibroblasts by Defined Factors , 2007, Cell.

[73]  Mark Ptashne,et al.  On the use of the word ‘epigenetic’ , 2007, Current Biology.

[74]  Sui Huang,et al.  Endothelial Biomedicine: Cell Fates as Attractors: Stability and Flexibility of Cellular Phenotypes , 2007 .

[75]  W. Wong,et al.  A gene regulatory network in mouse embryonic stem cells , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[76]  Marius Wernig,et al.  Direct reprogramming of genetically unmodified fibroblasts into pluripotent stem cells , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[77]  Adrian Bird,et al.  Perceptions of epigenetics , 2007, Nature.

[78]  J. Nichols,et al.  Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development , 2007, Nature.

[79]  A. Martinez Arias,et al.  Wnt/Notch signalling and information processing during development , 2008, Development.

[80]  K. Struhl,et al.  Epigenomics: A Roadmap, But to Where? , 2008, Science.

[81]  C. Please,et al.  Stochasticity and the Molecular Mechanisms of Induced Pluripotency , 2008, PloS one.

[82]  P. Mali,et al.  Improved Efficiency and Pace of Generating Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from Human Adult and Fetal Fibroblasts , 2008, Stem cells.

[83]  M. Araúzo-Bravo,et al.  Pluripotent stem cells induced from adult neural stem cells by reprogramming with two factors , 2008, Nature.

[84]  Douglas A. Melton,et al.  In vivo reprogramming of adult pancreatic exocrine cells to β-cells , 2008, Nature.

[85]  K. Hochedlinger,et al.  Defining molecular cornerstones during fibroblast to iPS cell reprogramming in mouse. , 2008, Cell stem cell.

[86]  Concepcion R. Nierras,et al.  The promise of human induced pluripotent stem cells for research and therapy , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[87]  Takashi Aoi,et al.  Generation of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Adult Mouse Liver and Stomach Cells , 2008, Science.

[88]  Hannah H. Chang,et al.  Transcriptome-wide noise controls lineage choice in mammalian progenitor cells , 2008, Nature.

[89]  C. Lengner,et al.  Sequential expression of pluripotency markers during direct reprogramming of mouse somatic cells. , 2008, Cell stem cell.

[90]  D. Gifford,et al.  Analysis of the mouse embryonic stem cell regulatory networks obtained by ChIP-chip and ChIP-PET , 2008, Genome Biology.

[91]  Santhosh Palani,et al.  Positive receptor feedback during lineage commitment can generate ultrasensitivity to ligand and confer robustness to a bistable switch. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[92]  Carsten Peterson,et al.  A Computational Model for Understanding Stem Cell, Trophectoderm and Endoderm Lineage Determination , 2008, PloS one.

[93]  G. Birkhoff,et al.  Mediators of reprogramming: transcription factors and transitions through mitosis , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[94]  W. Tian,et al.  Identification of osteo–adipo progenitor cells in fat tissue , 2008, Cell proliferation.

[95]  B. Doble,et al.  The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal , 2008, Nature.

[96]  L. Zon,et al.  Hematopoiesis: An Evolving Paradigm for Stem Cell Biology , 2008, Cell.

[97]  Sui Huang,et al.  Complex Gene Regulatory Networks - from Structure to Biological Observables: Cell Fate Determination , 2009, Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science.

[98]  T. Cantz,et al.  Induced pluripotent stem cells generated without viral integration , 2009, Hepatology.

[99]  Sui Huang,et al.  The potential landscape of genetic circuits imposes the arrow of time in stem cell differentiation. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[100]  Phoebe Pollit,et al.  Back to the beginning. , 2011, Advance for NPs & PAs.

[101]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  ORIGINS OF ORDER , 2019, Origins of Order.