Tailoring B cell depletion therapy in MS according to memory B cell monitoring

Objective We wanted to evaluate efficacy on inflammatory parameters of rituximab (RTX)-personalized reinfusion scheme using a memory B cell–based treatment regimen. Methods This is a prospective, uncontrolled, open-label study including patients with MS treated with RTX in 2 Italian MS units. All patients were treated with RTX induction, followed by maintenance infusion at the dosage of 375 mg/m2, according to memory B cell repopulation (0.05% of peripheral-blood mononuclear cells [PBMCs] for the first 2 years, 0.1% of PBMC for the third year). MS activity was assessed as clinical or MRI activity. Results One hundred two patients were included in the analysis. Mean follow-up was 2.40 years (range 0.57–7.15 years). The annualized relapse rate (ARR) was 0.67 in the year before RTX start and decreased to 0.01 in the 3 years after RTX initiation (global ARR). The proportion of patient with MS activity (i.e., relapse or MRI activity) was 63.16% in the year before RTX start and decreased to 8.7% (0–6 months), 1.3% (6–12 months), 0% (12–24 months), and 0% (24–36 months). Annualized RTX infusion rates were 1.67 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.43–1.94), 0.76 (95% CI: 0.58–0.98), and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.52–1.12) for the first 3 years after RTX initiation, respectively. Patients were reinfused with a mean infusion interval of 367 days (range 181–839 days). Conclusion The results of this study show that the memory B cell–based RTX reinfusion protocol is able to reduce the mean number of RTX reinfusions with persistent reduction of disease activity. Classification of evidence This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with MS, a memory B cell–based RTX reinfusion protocol can reduce the mean number of RTX reinfusions with persistent reduction of disease activity.

[1]  A. Bar-Or,et al.  P36 Serum immunoglobulin levels and risk of serious infections in the pivotal phase III trials of ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis and their open-label extensions , 2020, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  M. Sormani,et al.  Efficacy of different rituximab therapeutic strategies in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. , 2019, Multiple sclerosis and related disorders.

[3]  Jae-Won Hyun,et al.  Individualized B cell-targeting therapy for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder , 2019, Neurochemistry International.

[4]  M. Sormani,et al.  Treatment of multiple sclerosis with rituximab: A multicentric Italian–Swiss experience , 2019, Multiple sclerosis.

[5]  S. Berntsson,et al.  Rapidly increasing off‐label use of rituximab in multiple sclerosis in Sweden — Outlier or predecessor? , 2018, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[6]  K. Schmierer,et al.  Memory B Cells are Major Targets for Effective Immunotherapy in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis , 2017, EBioMedicine.

[7]  A. Traboulsee,et al.  Ocrelizumab versus Interferon Beta‐1a in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Peter Sundström,et al.  Rituximab in multiple sclerosis , 2016, Neurology.

[9]  J. Joo,et al.  Treatment Outcomes With Rituximab in 100 Patients With Neuromyelitis Optica: Influence of FCGR3A Polymorphisms on the Therapeutic Response to Rituximab. , 2015, JAMA neurology.

[10]  Su-Hyun Kim,et al.  Repeated treatment with rituximab based on the assessment of peripheral circulating memory B cells in patients with relapsing neuromyelitis optica over 2 years. , 2011, Archives of neurology.