Organ doses and subjective image quality of indirect digital panoramic radiography.

OBJECTIVES To determine if slight variations in exposure will affect diagnostic image quality and absorbed radiation doses for digital and analogue panoramic radiography. METHODS Thermoluminescent dosimeters were placed in the thyroid gland, eyes, submandibular glands, parotid glands and skin of two human cadaver heads. Three different exposure settings were used: 70 kV, 120 mAs; 77 kV, 75 mAs; and 81 kV, 60 mAs. Subjective image quality was assessed using a phantom head. Storage phosphor (SP) images were printed on film and both analogue and SP images were assessed for their subjective image quality on a five-point rating scale. The results were statistically analysed using logistic regression analysis and chi(2) tests. RESULTS Highest organ doses were measured for the submandibular glands, followed by the parotid glands. Salivary gland doses tended to be higher at lower kV settings. Image quality was not statistically different for the different exposure settings. Imaging technique did not seem to influence diagnostic image quality, except for the periapical status of upper premolars where SP was better. The main reason for any differences appeared to be interobserver variation. CONCLUSIONS Analogue and SP panoramic radiography performed equally well for subjective diagnostic image quality. No significant differences could be found at the exposure settings used in this study. Radiation doses were highest for the salivary glands, especially at lower kV settings.

[1]  L. Bernstein,et al.  Medical and dental x rays as risk factors for recently diagnosed tumors of the head. , 1985, National Cancer Institute monograph.

[2]  B. Ljung,et al.  Environmental Factors and the Risk of Salivary Gland Cancer , 1997, Epidemiology.

[3]  S. Preston‐Martin,et al.  Prior exposure to medical and dental x-rays related to tumors of the parotid gland. , 1988, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[4]  K. Faulkner,et al.  Optimisation of patient doses in programmable dental panoramic radiography. , 2000, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[5]  G. Bankvall,et al.  Radiation-absorbed doses and energy imparted from panoramic tomography, cephalometric radiography, and occlusal film radiography in children. , 1982, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[6]  S. Preston‐Martin,et al.  Brain and salivary gland tumors related to prior dental radiography: implications for current practice. , 1990, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[7]  A. Farman,et al.  The OP 100 Digipan: evaluation of the image layer, magnification factors, and dosimetry. , 1997, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[8]  K. Faulkner,et al.  Dose reduction in panoramic radiography. , 1993, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[9]  H G Gröndahl,et al.  Image quality in panoramic radiography. , 1995, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[10]  P. van der Stelt,et al.  Effects of dose reduction on the detectability of standardized radiolucent lesions in digital panoramic radiography. , 1998, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[11]  R. Hobson,et al.  Preliminary quantitative microradiography study into the distribution of bone mineralization within the basal bone of the human edentulous mandible. , 1997, Archives of Oral Biology.

[12]  A Boyde,et al.  Variation in the apparent density of human mandibular bone with age and dental status , 1998, Journal of anatomy.