IEEE Committee on Man and Radiation—COMAR Technical Information Statement: Health and Safety Issues Concerning Exposure of the General Public to Electromagnetic Energy from 5G Wireless Communications Networks

Abstract This COMAR Technical Information Statement (TIS) addresses health and safety issues concerning exposure of the general public to radiofrequency (RF) fields from 5G wireless communications networks, the expansion of which started on a large scale in 2018 to 2019. 5G technology can transmit much greater amounts of data at much higher speeds for a vastly expanded array of applications compared with preceding 2-4G systems; this is due, in part, to using the greater bandwidth available at much higher frequencies than those used by most existing networks. Although the 5G engineering standard may be deployed for operating networks currently using frequencies extending from 100s to 1,000s of MHz, it can also operate in the 10s of GHz where the wavelengths are 10 mm or less, the so-called millimeter wave (MMW) band. Until now, such fields were found in a limited number of applications (e.g., airport scanners, automotive collision avoidance systems, perimeter surveillance radar), but the rapid expansion of 5G will produce a more ubiquitous presence of MMW in the environment. While some 5G signals will originate from small antennas placed on existing base stations, most will be deployed with some key differences relative to typical transmissions from 2-4G base stations. Because MMW do not penetrate foliage and building materials as well as signals at lower frequencies, the networks will require “densification,” the installation of many lower power transmitters (often called “small cells” located mainly on buildings and utility poles) to provide for effective indoor coverage. Also, “beamforming” antennas on some 5G systems will transmit one or more signals directed to individual users as they move about, thus limiting exposures to non-users. In this paper, COMAR notes the following perspectives to address concerns expressed about possible health effects of RF field exposure from 5G technology. First, unlike lower frequency fields, MMW do not penetrate beyond the outer skin layers and thus do not expose inner tissues to MMW. Second, current research indicates that overall levels of exposure to RF are unlikely to be significantly altered by 5G, and exposure will continue to originate mostly from the “uplink” signals from one’s own device (as they do now). Third, exposure levels in publicly accessible spaces will remain well below exposure limits established by international guideline and standard setting organizations, including ICNIRP and IEEE. Finally, so long as exposures remain below established guidelines, the research results to date do not support a determination that adverse health effects are associated with RF exposures, including those from 5G systems. While it is acknowledged that the scientific literature on MMW biological effect research is more limited than that for lower frequencies, we also note that it is of mixed quality and stress that future research should use appropriate precautions to enhance validity. The authorship of this paper includes a physician/biologist, epidemiologist, engineers, and physical scientists working voluntarily and collaboratively on a consensus basis.

[1]  T J Walters,et al.  Thresholds of microwave-evoked warmth sensations in human skin. , 1997, Bioelectromagnetics.

[2]  Quirino Balzano,et al.  Modeling Tissue Heating From Exposure to Radiofrequency Energy and Relevance of Tissue Heating to Exposure Limits: Heating Factor , 2018, Health physics.

[3]  A. Wood,et al.  Non-ionizing Radiation Protection: Summary of Research and Policy Options , 2017 .

[4]  Martin Röösli,et al.  EMF Monitoring—Concepts, Activities, Gaps and Options , 2014, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[5]  Elif Degirmenci,et al.  Assessment of Compliance With RF EMF Exposure Limits: Approximate Methods for Radio Base Station Products Utilizing Array Antennas With Beam-Forming Capabilities , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[6]  W. Joseph,et al.  Characterisation of spatial and temporal variability of RF-EMF exposure levels in urban environments in Flanders, Belgium. , 2019, Environmental research.

[7]  Akimasa Hirata,et al.  Human exposure to pulsed fields in the frequency range from 6 to 100 GHz , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  S. Henderson,et al.  Survey of RF exposure levels from mobile telephone base stations in Australia , 2006, Bioelectromagnetics.

[9]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Registered Reports A Method to Increase the Credibility of Published Results , 2014 .

[10]  J. Wiart,et al.  Joint Minimization of Uplink and Downlink Whole-Body Exposure Dose in Indoor Wireless Networks , 2015, BioMed research international.

[11]  Radu Popescu,et al.  Links between extremely high frequency electromagnetic waves and their biological manifestations , 2015 .

[12]  T. Eikelboom,et al.  Personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field measurements in The Netherlands: exposure level and variability for everyday activities, times of day and types of area. , 2012, Environment international.

[13]  Gerardo Di Martino,et al.  Planning 5G Networks Under EMF Constraints: State of the Art and Vision , 2018, IEEE Access.

[14]  T. Walters,et al.  Heating and pain sensation produced in human skin by millimeter waves: comparison to a simple thermal model. , 2000, Health physics.

[15]  M. Fukunari,et al.  Clinical Course of High-Frequency Millimeter-Wave (162 GHz) Induced Ocular Injuries and Investigation of Damage Thresholds , 2020, Journal of Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves.

[16]  Akimasa Hirata,et al.  Setting exposure guidelines and product safety standards for radio-frequency exposure at frequencies above 6 GHz: brief review , 2018, Ann. des Télécommunications.

[17]  W R Green,et al.  Absence of ocular effects after either single or repeated exposure to 10 mW/cm(2) from a 60 GHz CW source. , 1999, Bioelectromagnetics.

[18]  M Feychting,et al.  Output power levels from mobile phones in different geographical areas; implications for exposure assessment , 2004, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[19]  Paolo Baracca,et al.  A Statistical Approach for RF Exposure Compliance Boundary Assessment in Massive MIMO Systems , 2018, WSA.

[20]  Agostino Di Ciaula,et al.  Towards 5G communication systems: Are there health implications? , 2018, International journal of hygiene and environmental health.

[21]  Soichi Watanabe,et al.  ACUTE OCULAR INJURIES CAUSED BY 60-GHZ MILLIMETER-WAVE EXPOSURE , 2009, Health physics.

[22]  C. Goodman Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health , 1988 .

[23]  Kenneth R Foster,et al.  Thermal aspects of exposure to radiofrequency energy: Report of a workshop , 2011, International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group.

[24]  Dirk Heberling,et al.  Impact of the Elevation Scanning Angle on the Vertical Compliance Distance of 5G Massive MIMO Antennas , 2019, 2019 13th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP).

[25]  M. Parazzini,et al.  Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields Exposure Assessment in Indoor Environments: A Review , 2019, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[26]  M. Eeftens,et al.  Public exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields in everyday microenvironments: An updated systematic review for Europe. , 2019, Environmental research.

[27]  Vincent P Wallace,et al.  The interaction between electromagnetic fields at megahertz, gigahertz and terahertz frequencies with cells, tissues and organisms: risks and potential , 2017, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[28]  Frank S. Barnes,et al.  Bioengineering and Biophysical Aspects of Electromagnetic Fields , 2006 .

[29]  Quirino Balzano,et al.  Thermal Modeling for the Next Generation of Radiofrequency Exposure Limits: Commentary. , 2017, Health physics.

[30]  P. Ravazzani,et al.  Electromagnetic field exposure assessment in Europe radiofrequency fields (10 MHz–6 GHz) , 2013, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[31]  Achilles Boursianis,et al.  Measurements for assessing the exposure from 3G femtocells. , 2012, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[32]  Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields , 2020 .

[33]  Yoann Corre,et al.  Joint analysis of small-cell network performance and urban Electromagnetic Field exposure , 2014, The 8th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP 2014).

[34]  P. A. Mason,et al.  Lack of effect of 94 GHz radio frequency radiation exposure in an animal model of skin carcinogenesis. , 2001, Carcinogenesis.

[35]  Y. Akyel,et al.  Current state and implications of research on biological effects of millimeter waves: a review of the literature. , 1998, Bioelectromagnetics.

[36]  R. Croft,et al.  Personal Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields among Australian Adults , 2018, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[37]  Steven E. Widergren,et al.  Definitions, Scope, Visions, and Benefits , 2016 .

[38]  M. McCarthy The statistical approach , 1959 .

[39]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  The human body and millimeter-wave wireless communication systems: Interactions and implications , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[40]  J. D’andrea,et al.  MILLIMETER WAVE ABSORPTION IN THE NONHUMAN PRIMATE EYE AT 35 GHz AND 94 GHz , 2002, Health physics.

[41]  R. Vermeulen,et al.  Spatial and temporal variability of personal environmental exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields in children in Europe. , 2018, Environment international.

[42]  Jimmy Estenberg,et al.  Extensive frequency selective measurements of radiofrequency fields in outdoor environments performed with a novel mobile monitoring system , 2014, Bioelectromagnetics.

[43]  D. Denning,et al.  Ophthalmic thermal injuries. , 1996, The American surgeon.

[44]  Joe Wiart,et al.  Assessment of RF human exposure to LTE small-and macro-cells: UL case , 2017, 2017 11th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP).

[45]  Myrtill Simkó,et al.  5G Wireless Communication and Health Effects—A Pragmatic Review Based on Available Studies Regarding 6 to 100 GHz , 2019, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[46]  K. Joyner,et al.  Comparative international analysis of radiofrequency exposure surveys of mobile communication radio base stations , 2012, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[47]  S. I. Alekseev,et al.  Biological Effects of Millimeter and Submillimeter Waves , 2018, Biological and Medical Aspects of Electromagnetic Fields.

[48]  D. Savitz,et al.  INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON NON-IONIZING RADIATION PROTECTION , 2011 .

[49]  Luc Martens,et al.  Modeling and Characterization of the Uplink and Downlink Exposure in Wireless Networks , 2017 .

[50]  Marloes Eeftens,et al.  Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure in everyday microenvironments in Europe: A systematic literature review , 2018, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[51]  R. Croft,et al.  A Closer Look at the Thresholds of Thermal Damage: Workshop Report by an ICNIRP Task Group , 2016, Health physics.