Accuracy analysis of unstructured finite volume discretization schemes for diffusive fluxes

Abstract Numerical errors form a major source of uncertainty in CFD simulations. This source of error, which is more significant on unstructured meshes, can be alleviated by a careful choice of discretization scheme. In the context of finite volume methods, there are many suggestions for the discretization of diffusive fluxes appearing in viscous flow simulations. In this paper, a wide range of discretization schemes commonly used for diffusive flux approximation in cell-centered unstructured finite volume solvers are compared in terms of discretization and truncation errors. In addition, a novel eigenanalysis tool is proposed to relate these two forms of numerical error to each other and to interpret the error behaviors obtained by each scheme. The error comparisons are performed on unstructured meshes consisting of both isotropic and anisotropic triangles. Our results suggest that adding a solution jump term to the baseline face gradient (determined as the average of two adjacent cell gradients) provides the most accurate approximation for diffusive fluxes. Also, this term produces sufficient damping to stabilize the discretization even on highly skewed meshes.

[1]  Mori Mani,et al.  Towards accurate flow predictions using unstructured meshes , 2009 .

[2]  Hiroaki Nishikawa,et al.  Two Ways to Extend Diffusion Schemes to Navier-Stokes Schemes: Gradient Formula or Upwind Flux , 2011 .

[3]  Boris Diskin,et al.  Comparison of Node-Centered and Cell-Centered Unstructured Finite-Volume Discretizations: Inviscid Fluxes , 2011 .

[4]  Jens-Dominik Müller,et al.  Discretisation of diffusive fluxes on hybrid grids , 2010, J. Comput. Phys..

[5]  C. Hirsch Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows, Volume 2: Computational Methods for Inviscid and Viscous Flows , 1990 .

[6]  Hiroaki Nishikawa Robust and accurate viscous discretization via upwind scheme – I: Basic principle , 2011 .

[7]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[8]  James J. McGuirk,et al.  Finite Volume Discretization Aspects for Viscous Flows on Mixed Unstructured Grids , 1999 .

[9]  Carl Ollivier-Gooch,et al.  Globalized matrix-explicit Newton-GMRES for the high-order accurate solution of the Euler equations , 2010 .

[10]  Boris Diskin,et al.  A critical study of agglomerated multigrid methods for diffusion on highly-stretched grids , 2011 .

[11]  Jiri Blazek,et al.  Accurate and Efficient Discretization of Navier-Stokes Equations on Mixed Grids , 2000 .

[12]  Dimitri J. Mavriplis,et al.  Grid Resolution Study of a Drag Prediction Workshop Configuration Using the NSU3D Unstructured Mesh Solver , 2005 .

[13]  Christopher J. Roy,et al.  Review of Discretization Error Estimators in Scientific Computing , 2010 .

[14]  Hiroaki Nishikawa,et al.  Beyond Interface Gradient: A General Principle for Constructing Diffusion Schemes , 2010 .

[15]  Boris Diskin,et al.  Comparison of Node-Centered and Cell-Centered Unstructured Finite-Volume Discretizations , 2013 .

[17]  P. Roe Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors, and Difference Schemes , 1997 .