Estimating the scope for savings in referrals and drug prescription costs in the general Practice units of a UK primary care trust

This paper explores the potential for cost savings in the general Practice units of a Primary Care Trust (PCT) in the UK. We have used Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to identify benchmark Practices, which offer the lowest aggregate referral and drugs costs controlling for the number, age, gender, and deprivation level of the patients registered with each Practice. For the remaining, non-benchmark Practices, estimates of the potential for savings on referral and drug costs were obtained. Such savings could be delivered through a combination of the following actions: (i) reducing the levels of referrals and prescriptions without affecting their mix (£15.74 m savings were identified, representing 6.4% of total expenditure); (ii) switching between inpatient and outpatient referrals and/or drug treatment to exploit differences in their unit costs (£10.61 m savings were identified, representing 4.3% of total expenditure); (iii) seeking a different profile of referral and drug unit costs (£11.81 m savings were identified, representing 4.8% of total expenditure).

[1]  Carmelo Petraglia,et al.  Technical efficiency in primary health care: does quality matter? , 2011, The European Journal of Health Economics.

[2]  S. Santos,et al.  Challenges for performance assessment and improvement in primary health care: the case of the Portuguese health centres. , 2009, Health policy.

[3]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Exploring output quality targets in the provision of perinatal care in England using data envelopment analysis , 1995 .

[4]  Matthias Staat,et al.  The efficiency of treatment strategies of general practitioners , 2003, The European Journal of Health Economics, formerly: HEPAC.

[5]  Harold O. Fried,et al.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency and Productivity Growth , 2008 .

[6]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[7]  K. Tone,et al.  Decomposition of cost efficiency and its application to Japanese-US electric utility comparisons , 2007 .

[8]  Robert G. Dyson,et al.  Exploring the use of DEA for formative evaluation in primary diabetes care: An application to compare English practices , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[9]  Dorte Gyrd-Hansen,et al.  Differences in general practice initiated expenditures across Danish local health authorities-A multilevel analysis. , 2009, Health policy.

[10]  Robert G. Dyson,et al.  A generalisation of the Farrell cost efficiency measure applicable to non-fully competitive settings , 2008 .

[11]  Peter Smith,et al.  Data envelopment analysis applied to quality in primary health care , 1996, Ann. Oper. Res..

[12]  R. Hjerppe,et al.  Financial incentives and productive efficiency in Finnish health centres. , 1996, Health economics.

[13]  Georgios Tsakos,et al.  Using DEA to Evaluate Efficiency and Formulate Policy Within a Greek National Primary Health Care Network , 2002, Journal of Medical Systems.

[14]  B. Hollingsworth The measurement of efficiency and productivity of health care delivery. , 2008, Health economics.

[15]  Jaume Puig-Junoy,et al.  Cost Efficiency in Primary Care Contracting: A Stochastic Frontier Cost Function Approach , 2003 .

[16]  H. David Sherman,et al.  DEA and primary care physician report cards: Deriving preferred practice cones from managed care service concepts and operating strategies , 1997, Ann. Oper. Res..

[17]  Jaume Puig-Junoy,et al.  Cost efficiency in primary care contracting: a stochastic frontier cost function approach. , 2004, Health economics.

[18]  Robert G. Dyson,et al.  On comparing the performance of primary care providers , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  A. Donabedian The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment , 1980 .

[20]  J Fletcher,et al.  Efficiency and Effectiveness in General Practice , 1993 .

[21]  H. David Sherman,et al.  Health Care Applications , 2004 .