SPMS: A Scientific Decision Framework forbSmartphone Manufacturer Selection using Linguistic Preferences

The usage of smart phones by Indian students is tremendously growing at faster pace. To cope with the high-end demand, mobile manufacturers have to make rational decisions regarding the market expansion and quality improvement. To critical decision, in this paper, a new scientific decision framework called SPMS is (smart phone manufacturer selector) presented. The SPMS consist of three stages viz., data acquisition and pre-processing stage, data fusion and criteria weighting stage and selection/ranking stage. The data is collected from questionnaires which are completed by students of colleges in and around Thanjavur district. The missing information in the dataset are completed using bin by mean method, followed by feature set reduction is done using Gini index method. In the second stage, linguistic information are aggregated using frequency match aggregation (FMA) operator with unconstrained weight values. Further, criteria weights are determined using standard variance (SV) method under linguistic context. Finally, ranking of smart phone manufacturers is done using VIKOR method under linguistic context. The practicality and usefulness of the proposed framework is demonstrated using a case study for smart phone selection. The strength and weakness of the proposal is also realized by comparison with other state-of-art frameworks.

[1]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Novel basic operational laws for linguistic terms, hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and probabilistic linguistic term sets , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[2]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  A consensus process for group decision making with probabilistic linguistic preference relations , 2017, Inf. Sci..

[3]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[4]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Linguistic measures based on fuzzy coincidence for reaching consensus in group decision making , 1997, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[5]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Consistency Measures for Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relations , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[7]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A Sequential Selection Process in Group Decision Making with a Linguistic Assessment Approach , 1995, Inf. Sci..

[8]  Sen Liu,et al.  Decision making for the selection of cloud vendor: An improved approach under group decision-making with integrated weights and objective/subjective attributes , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[9]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  Competence gaps in software personnel: A multi-organizational study , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[10]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Exploring smart phone improvements based on a hybrid MCDM model , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  T. Keiningham,et al.  The value of different customer satisfaction and loyalty metrics in predicting customer retention, recommendation, and share‐of‐wallet , 2007 .

[12]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  An approach based on the uncertain LOWG and induced uncertain LOWG operators to group decision making with uncertain multiplicative linguistic preference relations , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..