Pathogenic ATM Mutations in Cancer and a Genetic Basis for Radiotherapeutic Efficacy.

BACKGROUND Radiation therapy is one of the most commonly used cancer therapeutics, but genetic determinants of clinical benefit are poorly characterized. Pathogenic germline variants in ATM are known to cause ataxia-telangiectasia, a rare hereditary syndrome notable for marked radiosensitivity. In contrast, somatic inactivation of ATM is a common event in a wide variety of cancers, but its clinical actionability remains obscure. METHODS We analyzed 20,107 consecutively treated advanced cancer patients who underwent targeted genomic sequencing as part of an institutional genomic profiling initiative and identified 1,085 harboring a somatic or germline ATM mutation, including 357 who received radiotherapy. Outcomes of irradiated tumors harboring ATM loss-of-function (LoF) mutations were compared to those harboring variants of unknown significance (VUS). All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS Among 357 pan-cancer patients who received 727 courses of radiotherapy, genetic inactivation of ATM was associated with improved radiotherapeutic efficacy. The 2-year cumulative incidence of irradiated tumor progression was 13.2% vs 27.5% for tumors harboring an ATM LoF vs VUS allele, respectively (HR: 0.51, 95% CI = 0.34-0.77, p= .001). The greatest clinical benefit was seen in tumors harboring bi-allelic ATM inactivation (HR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.06-0.60, p=.005), with statistically significant benefit also observed in tumors with mono-allelic ATM inactivation (HR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.35-0.92, p=.02). Notably, ATM LoF was highly predictive of outcome in TP53 wild type tumors, but not among TP53-mutant tumors. CONCLUSION We demonstrate that somatic ATM inactivation is associated with markedly improved tumor control following radiotherapy. The identification of a radiosensitive tumor phenotype across multiple cancer types offers potential clinical opportunities for genomically-guided radiotherapy.

[1]  Rui Bi,et al.  The Landscape of Somatic Genetic Alterations in Breast Cancers From ATM Germline Mutation Carriers. , 2018, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  A. Vincent-Salomon,et al.  Morphology and genomic hallmarks of breast tumours developed by ATM deleterious variant carriers , 2018, Breast Cancer Research.

[3]  A. Nicolas,et al.  Contribution of germline deleterious variants in the RAD51 paralogs to breast and ovarian cancers , 2017, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[4]  P. Kantoff,et al.  Mutation Detection in Patients With Advanced Cancer by Universal Sequencing of Cancer-Related Genes in Tumor and Normal DNA vs Guideline-Based Germline Testing , 2017, JAMA.

[5]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Integrated Genomic Characterization of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. , 2017, Cancer cell.

[6]  Ash A. Alizadeh,et al.  Role of KEAP1/NRF2 and TP53 Mutations in Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma Development and Radiation Resistance. , 2017, Cancer discovery.

[7]  J. Reis-Filho,et al.  Bi‐allelic alterations in DNA repair genes underpin homologous recombination DNA repair defects in breast cancer , 2017, The Journal of pathology.

[8]  Donavan T. Cheng,et al.  Comprehensive detection of germline variants by MSK-IMPACT, a clinical diagnostic platform for solid tumor molecular oncology and concurrent cancer predisposition testing , 2017, BMC Medical Genomics.

[9]  R. Mak,et al.  Radiation Resistance in KRAS-Mutated Lung Cancer Is Enabled by Stem-like Properties Mediated by an Osteopontin-EGFR Pathway. , 2017, Cancer research.

[10]  Donavan T. Cheng,et al.  Mutational Landscape of Metastatic Cancer Revealed from Prospective Clinical Sequencing of 10,000 Patients , 2017, Nature Medicine.

[11]  Jacob G. Scott,et al.  A genome-based model for adjusting radiotherapy dose (GARD): a retrospective, cohort-based study. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[12]  T. Kipps,et al.  ATM Mutations in Cancer: Therapeutic Implications , 2016, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[13]  V. Seshan,et al.  FACETS: allele-specific copy number and clonal heterogeneity analysis tool for high-throughput DNA sequencing , 2016, Nucleic acids research.

[14]  Weiwu Wang,et al.  Structure of the intact ATM/Tel1 kinase , 2016, Nature Communications.

[15]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  The Molecular Taxonomy of Primary Prostate Cancer , 2015, Cell.

[16]  Donavan T. Cheng,et al.  Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT): A Hybridization Capture-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Clinical Assay for Solid Tumor Molecular Oncology. , 2015, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[17]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular profiling of lung adenocarcinoma , 2014, Nature.

[18]  Joshua M. Korn,et al.  Pharmacological and genomic profiling identifies NF-κB–targeted treatment strategies for mantle cell lymphoma , 2013, Nature Medicine.

[19]  D. Kirsch,et al.  Role of p53 in regulating tissue response to radiation by mechanisms independent of apoptosis. , 2013, Translational cancer research.

[20]  Richard A. Moore,et al.  The E3 ubiquitin ligase UBR5 is recurrently mutated in mantle cell lymphoma. , 2013, Blood.

[21]  Y. Shiloh,et al.  The ATM protein kinase: regulating the cellular response to genotoxic stress, and more , 2013, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[22]  M. Stern,et al.  Underexpression and abnormal localization of ATM products in ataxia telangiectasia patients bearing ATM missense mutations , 2011, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[23]  T. Dörk,et al.  New mutations in the ATM gene and clinical data of 25 AT patients , 2011, neurogenetics.

[24]  N. Drouot,et al.  Epidemiological, clinical, paraclinical and molecular study of a cohort of 102 patients affected with autosomal recessive progressive cerebellar ataxia from Alsace, Eastern France: implications for clinical management , 2010, neurogenetics.

[25]  P. Byrd,et al.  Modeling ATM mutant proteins from missense changes confirms retained kinase activity , 2009, Human mutation.

[26]  M. Kastan,et al.  Transient inhibition of ATM kinase is sufficient to enhance cellular sensitivity to ionizing radiation. , 2008, Cancer research.

[27]  D. Stoppa-Lyonnet,et al.  Cancer risk according to type and location of ATM mutation in ataxia‐telangiectasia families , 2005, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[28]  N. Gueven,et al.  Functional consequences of sequence alterations in the ATM gene. , 2004, DNA repair.

[29]  W. Chan,et al.  Oligonucleotide microarrays demonstrate the highest frequency of ATM mutations in the mantle cell subtype of lymphoma , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  P. Guldberg,et al.  ATM mutations are associated with inactivation of the ARF-TP53 tumor suppressor pathway in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. , 2002 .

[31]  A. Børresen-Dale,et al.  ATM mutations in Finnish breast cancer patients , 2002, Journal of medical genetics.

[32]  Sara G. Becker-Catania,et al.  Ataxia-telangiectasia: phenotype/genotype studies of ATM protein expression, mutations, and radiosensitivity. , 2000, Molecular genetics and metabolism.

[33]  D. Easton,et al.  ATM mutations and phenotypes in ataxia-telangiectasia families in the British Isles: expression of mutant ATM and the risk of leukemia, lymphoma, and breast cancer. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[34]  A. Taylor,et al.  Ataxia telangiectasia: a human mutation with abnormal radiation sensitivity , 1975, Nature.

[35]  F. Bosch,et al.  ATM gene inactivation in mantle cell lymphoma mainly occurs by truncating mutations and missense mutations involving the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase domain and is associated with increasing numbers of chromosomal imbalances. , 2002, Blood.

[36]  T. Dörk,et al.  Characterization of ATM gene mutations in 66 ataxia telangiectasia families. , 1999, Human molecular genetics.

[37]  A. Børresen-Dale,et al.  Ataxia-telangiectasia: identification and detection of founder-effect mutations in the ATM gene in ethnic populations. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[38]  A. Broeks,et al.  ATM germline mutations in classical ataxia‐telangiectasia patients in the Dutch population , 1998, Human mutation.