Selecting police super-recognisers

People vary in their ability to recognise faces. These individual differences are consistent over time, heritable and associated with brain anatomy. This implies that face identity processing can be improved in applied settings by selecting high performers–‘super-recognisers’ (SRs)–but these selection processes are rarely available for scientific scrutiny. Here we report an ‘end-to-end’ selection process used to establish an SR ‘unit’ in a large police force. Australian police officers (n = 1600) completed 3 standardised face identification tests and we recruited 38 SRs from this cohort to complete 10 follow-up tests. As a group, SRs were 20% better than controls in lab-based tests of face memory and matching, and equalled or surpassed accuracy of forensic specialists that currently perform face identification tasks for police. Individually, SR accuracy was variable but this problem was mitigated by adopting strict selection criteria. SRs’ superior abilities transferred only partially to body identity decisions where the face was not visible, and they were no better than controls at deciding which visual scene that faces had initially been encountered in. Notwithstanding these important qualifications, we conclude that super-recognisers are an effective solution to improving face identity processing in applied settings.

[1]  D. White,et al.  Face-Information Sampling in Super-Recognizers , 2022, Psychological science.

[2]  D. White,et al.  Individual differences and the multidimensional nature of face perception , 2022, Nature Reviews Psychology.

[3]  Meike Ramon,et al.  Face Recognition in Police Officers:Who Fits the Bill? , 2022, Forensic Science International: Reports.

[4]  A. Towler,et al.  Match me if you can: Evidence for a domain-general visual comparison ability , 2022, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[5]  D. White,et al.  Diverse routes to expertise in facial recognition , 2021 .

[6]  Amy N. Yates,et al.  Forensic facial examiners vs. super-recognizers: Evaluating behavior beyond accuracy , 2021, Applied Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  Markus M. Thielgen,et al.  Face processing in police service: the relationship between laboratory-based assessment of face processing abilities and performance in a real-world identity matching task , 2021, Cognitive research: principles and implications.

[8]  E. Portch,et al.  When two fields collide: Identifying “super-recognisers” for neuropsychological and forensic face recognition research , 2021, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  G. Kovács,et al.  Getting to Know You: Emerging Neural Representations during Face Familiarization , 2021, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  David White,et al.  GFMT2: A psychometric measure of face matching ability , 2021, Behavior Research Methods.

[11]  Simon Rjosk Super-Recognizers in (Berlin) law enforcement , 2021, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  Meike Ramon Super-Recognizers – a novel diagnostic framework, 70 cases, and guidelines for future work , 2021, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  D. White,et al.  Can Face Identification Ability Be Trained? , 2021, Forensic Face Matching.

[14]  M. Innes,et al.  ‘Assisted’ facial recognition and the reinvention of suspicion and discretion in digital policing , 2020, The British Journal of Criminology.

[15]  D. White,et al.  Can face identification ability be trained? Evidence for two routes to expertise , 2020 .

[16]  D. White,et al.  Understanding Professional Expertise in Unfamiliar Face Matching , 2020, Forensic Face Matching.

[17]  T. Thompson,et al.  Super‐recognisers: Face recognition performance after variable delay intervals , 2020 .

[18]  David J. Robertson,et al.  Capitalizing on the super-recognition advantage : a powerful, but underutilized, tool for policing and national security agencies , 2020 .

[19]  Josh P. Davis,et al.  UNSW Face Test: A screening tool for super-recognizers , 2020, PloS one.

[20]  Rankin W. McGugin,et al.  Thickness of deep layers in the fusiform face area predicts face recognition , 2019, bioRxiv.

[21]  D. White,et al.  Super‐recognizers: From the lab to the world and back again , 2019, British journal of psychology.

[22]  Mackenzie A. Sunday,et al.  Individual Differences in Object Recognition , 2019, Psychological review.

[23]  A. Burton,et al.  Do professional facial image comparison training courses work? , 2019, PloS one.

[24]  Matthew Q. Hill,et al.  Face recognition ability does not predict person identification performance: using individual data in the interpretation of group results , 2018, Cognitive research: principles and implications.

[25]  David J. Robertson,et al.  Individual differences in face identity processing , 2018, Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications.

[26]  D. White,et al.  Improving face identification with specialist teams , 2018, Cognitive research: principles and implications.

[27]  Swami Sankaranarayanan,et al.  Face recognition accuracy of forensic examiners, superrecognizers, and face recognition algorithms , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Josh P. Davis,et al.  Identification from CCTV: Assessing police super‐recogniser ability to spot faces in a crowd and susceptibility to change blindness , 2018 .

[29]  J. Tangen,et al.  The emergence of perceptual expertise with fingerprints over time. , 2017, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition.

[30]  K. Suzanne Scherf,et al.  Beyond the FFA: Brain-behavior correspondences in face recognition abilities , 2017, NeuroImage.

[31]  David White,et al.  Evaluating the Feature Comparison Strategy for Forensic Face Identification , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[32]  Josh P. Davis,et al.  Investigating predictors of superior face recognition ability in police super-recognisers , 2016 .

[33]  Galit Yovel,et al.  Recognizing People in Motion , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  Sebastien Miellet,et al.  Super-Memorizers Are Not Super-Recognizers , 2016, PloS one.

[35]  Rob Jenkins,et al.  Face Recognition by Metropolitan Police Super-Recognisers , 2016, PloS one.

[36]  Sarah Bate,et al.  Solving the Border Control Problem: Evidence of Enhanced Face Matching in Individuals with Extraordinary Face Recognition Skills , 2016, PloS one.

[37]  David White,et al.  Error Rates in Users of Automatic Face Recognition Software , 2015, PloS one.

[38]  Robert Plomin,et al.  Genetic specificity of face recognition , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Matthew Q. Hill,et al.  Perceptual expertise in forensic facial image comparison , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  A. Burton,et al.  Passport Officers’ Errors in Face Matching , 2014, PloS one.

[41]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Capturing specific abilities as a window into human individuality: The example of face recognition , 2012, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[42]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Human face recognition ability is specific and highly heritable , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  A. Burton,et al.  The Glasgow Face Matching Test , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[44]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Heritability of the Specific Cognitive Ability of Face Perception , 2010, Current Biology.

[45]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Super-recognizers: People with extraordinary face recognition ability , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[46]  D. S. Lindsay,et al.  I’d know that face anywhere! , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[47]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Differential development of high-level visual cortex correlates with category-specific recognition memory , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[48]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The Cambridge Face Memory Test: Results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[49]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Developmental Prosopagnosia: a Window to Content-specific Face Processing This Review Comes from a Themed Issue on Cognitive Neuroscience Edited Developmental Prosopagnosia and Inferences to Functional Organization Investigating the Architecture of Face Processing through Developmental Prosopagnosia , 2022 .

[50]  G. Pike,et al.  When Seeing should not be Believing: Photographs, Credit Cards and Fraud , 1997 .

[51]  L. Jacoby A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory , 1991 .

[52]  G. Mandler Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. , 1980 .