Conceptual Versus Algorithmic Problem-solving: Focusing on Problems Dealing with Conservation of Matter in Chemistry

The students’ performance in various types of problems dealing with the conservation of matter during chemical reactions has been investigated at different levels of schooling. The participants were 499 ninth grade (ages 14, 15 years) and 624 eleventh grade (ages 16, 17 years) Greek students. Data was collected using a written questionnaire concerning basic chemical concepts. Results of statistical factor and correlation analysis confirmed the classification of the problems used in three types: “algorithmic-type”, “particulate-type”, and “conceptual-type”. All the students had a far better performance in “particulate-type” problems than in the others. Although students’ ability in solving “algorithmic-type” problem increases as their school experience in chemistry progresses, their ability in solving “conceptual-type” problems decreases. Students’ achievement in chemistry was measured by a Chemical Concepts Test (CCT) containing 57 questions of various forms. High-achievement students scored higher both on “algorithmic-type” and “particulate-type” problems than low achievers with the greatest difference observed in solving “algorithmic-type” problems. It is concluded that competence in “particulate-type” and “algorithmic-type” problem solving may be independent of competence in solving “conceptual-type” ones. Furthermore, it was found that students’ misconceptions concerning chemical reactions and equivalence between mass and energy are impediments to their problem solving abilities. Finally, based on the findings, few suggestions concerning teaching practices are discussed.

[1]  Miles Pickering.  Further studies on concept learning versus problem solving , 1990 .

[2]  K. A. Goldsby,et al.  More Chemistry in a Soda Bottle:: A Conservation of Mass Activity , 1995 .

[3]  Dorothy L. Gabel,et al.  Differential effects on the achievement of males and females of teaching the particulate nature of chemistry , 2002 .

[4]  Mark S. Cracolice,et al.  Concept Learning versus Problem Solving: A Cognitive Difference. , 2008 .

[5]  B. Tuckman.  Conducting Educational Research , 1972 .

[6]  Robin Ss.  Is there a difference , 1967 .

[7]  Marc S. Schwartz,et al.  Students’ Understanding of Conservation of Matter, Stoichiometry and Balancing Equations in Indonesia , 2007 .

[8]  Dorothy L. Gabel,et al.  Improving Teaching and Learning through Chemistry Education Research: A Look to the Future , 1999 .

[9]  Jean Piaget,et al.  The Child's Construction of Quantities , 1974 .

[10]  J. Gilbert.  Chemical education: towards research-based practice , 2003 .

[11]  Duane F. Shell,et al.  Differences in problem solving by nonscience majors in introductory chemistry on paired algorithmic‐conceptual problems , 1997 .

[12]  Alipaşa Ayas,et al.  STUDENTS DIFFICULTIES IN UNDERSTANDING OF THE CONSERVATION OF MATTER IN OPEN AND CLOSED-SYSTEM CHEMICAL REACTIONS , 2003 .

[13]  Abdullateef H. Haidar,et al.  Prospective chemistry teachers' conceptions of the conservation of matter and related concepts , 1997 .

[14]  B. Andersson,et al.  Pupils' Explanations of Some Aspects of Chemical Reactions. , 1986 .

[15]  A. Field.  Discovering statistics using SPSS for Windows. , 2000 .

[16]  CRAIG W. BOWEN,et al.  Results of a National Survey on College Chemistry Faculty Beliefs and Attitudes of Assessment-of-Student-Learning Practices , 1997 .

[17]  Mansoor Niaz,et al.  Progressive Transitions from Algorithmic to Conceptual Understanding in Student Ability To Solve Chemistry Problems: A Lakatosian Interpretation. , 1995 .

[18]  John R. Staver,et al.  Two investigations of students' understanding of the mole concept and its use in problem solving , 1995 .

[19]  İbrahim Bilgin.  The Effects of Pair Problem Solving Technique Incorporating Polya's Problem Solving Strategy on Undergraduate Students' Performance in Chemistry. , 2006 .

[20]  Zuzana Haláková,et al.  Two Kinds of Conceptual Problems in Chemistry Teaching , 2007 .

[21]  H. Schweingruber,et al.  TAKING SCIENCE TO SCHOOL: LEARNING AND TEACHING SCIENCE IN GRADES K-8 , 2007 .

[22]  J. Dudley Herron,et al.  PROBLEM-SOLVING IN CHEMISTRY , 2002 .

[23]  Charles W. Anderson,et al.  Students' conceptions of chemical change , 1992 .

[24]  Michael J. Sanger.  Using Particulate Drawings to Determine and Improve Students' Conceptions of Pure Substances and Mixtures , 2000 .

[25]  Kimberly Jo Smith,et al.  Evaluating Student Understanding of Solution Chemistry through Microscopic Representations , 1996 .

[26]  Tae-Hee Noh,et al.  Instructional influence of a molecular‐level pictorial presentation of matter on students' conceptions and problem‐solving ability , 1997 .

[27]  Diane M. Bunce,et al.  Testing for Conceptual Understanding in General Chemistry1 , 1997 .

[28]  Mary B. Nakhleh,et al.  Are Our Students Conceptual Thinkers or Algorithmic Problem Solvers? Identifying Conceptual Students in General Chemistry , 1993 .

[29]  Sara Salloum,et al.  Relationships between selective cognitive variables and students' ability to solve chemistry problems , 2004 .

[30]  Jean Lythcott,et al.  Problem solving and requisite knowledge of chemistry , 1990 .

[31]  Mansoor Niaz.  The information‐processing demand of chemistry problems and its relation to Pascual‐Leone's functional M‐capacity , 1988 .

[32]  Susan C. Nurrenbern,et al.  Concept Learning versus Problem Solving: Is There a Difference?. , 1987 .

[33]  Mary B. Nakhleh,et al.  Concept learning versus problem solving: There is a difference , 1993 .

[34]  Barbara A. Sawrey.  Concept learning versus problem solving: Revisited , 1990 .

[35]  Students' ideas on conservation of matter: Effects of expertise and context variables , 1995 .

[36]  Michael J. Sanger,et al.  What Are Students Thinking When They Pick Their Answer? A Content Analysis of Students' Explanations of Gas Properties , 2007 .