An Analytical Model for the Influence of Contact Resistance on Thermoelectric Efficiency

An analytical model is presented that can account for both electrical and hot and cold thermal contact resistances when calculating the efficiency of a thermoelectric generator. The model is compared to a numerical model of a thermoelectric leg for 16 different thermoelectric materials, as well as to the analytical models of Ebling et al. (J Electron Mater 39:1376, 2010) and Min and Rowe (J Power Sour 38:253, 1992). The model presented here is shown to accurately calculate the efficiency for all systems and all contact resistances considered, with an average difference in efficiency between the numerical model and the analytical model of −0.07 ± 0.35pp. This makes the model more accurate than previously published models. The maximum absolute difference in efficiency between the analytical model and the numerical model is 1.14pp for all materials and all contact resistances considered.

[1]  R. Bjork,et al.  Analysis of the internal heat losses in a thermoelectric generator , 2014, 1409.6743.

[2]  Mohamed S. El-Genk,et al.  Performance Tests of Skutterudites and Segmented Thermoelectric Converters , 2004 .

[3]  G. J. Snyder,et al.  Towards high efficiency segmented thermoelectric unicouples , 2014 .

[4]  Miaofang Chi,et al.  Multiple-filled skutterudites: high thermoelectric figure of merit through separately optimizing electrical and thermal transports. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[5]  Matthew M. Barry,et al.  Convective Heat Transfer and Contact Resistances Effects on Performance of Conventional and Composite Thermoelectric Devices , 2014 .

[6]  M. Chi,et al.  On the Design of High‐Efficiency Thermoelectric Clathrates through a Systematic Cross‐Substitution of Framework Elements , 2010 .

[7]  Hohyun Lee,et al.  Enhanced thermoelectric figure-of-merit in nanostructured p-type silicon germanium bulk alloys. , 2008, Nano letters.

[8]  Andrew G. Glen,et al.  APPL , 2001 .

[9]  Hohyun Lee,et al.  Enhanced thermoelectric figure of merit in nanostructured n-type silicon germanium bulk alloy , 2008 .

[10]  Cham Kim,et al.  Significant enhancement in the thermoelectric performance of a bismuth telluride nanocompound through brief fabrication procedures. , 2012, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[11]  G. J. Snyder,et al.  Stabilizing the Optimal Carrier Concentration for High Thermoelectric Efficiency , 2011, Advanced materials.

[12]  Gao Min,et al.  Optimisation of thermoelectric module geometry for ‘waste heat’ electric power generation , 1992 .

[13]  Mohamed S. El-Genk,et al.  Tests results and performance comparisons of coated and un-coated skutterudite based segmented unicouples , 2006 .

[14]  Terry Hendricks,et al.  Electrical, Thermal, and Mechanical Characterization of Novel Segmented-Leg Thermoelectric Modules , 2011 .

[15]  U. Hilleringmann,et al.  Titanium Disilicide as High-Temperature Contact Material for Thermoelectric Generators , 2013, Journal of Electronic Materials.

[16]  Zhifeng Ren,et al.  Skutterudite Unicouple Characterization for Energy Harvesting Applications , 2013 .

[17]  Pervaiz K. Ahmed,et al.  Chapter 5 – Measurement and technology , 2002 .

[18]  G. J. Snyder,et al.  Optimizing Thermoelectric Efficiency in La 3- x Te 4 via Yb Substitution , 2010 .

[19]  G. J. Snyder,et al.  Traversing the Metal‐Insulator Transition in a Zintl Phase: Rational Enhancement of Thermoelectric Efficiency in Yb14Mn1−xAlxSb11 , 2008 .

[20]  Gang Chen,et al.  Enhanced thermoelectric figure-of-merit in p-type nanostructured bismuth antimony tellurium alloys made from elemental chunks. , 2008, Nano letters.

[21]  G. J. Snyder,et al.  Segmented Thermoelectric Oxide‐Based Module for High‐Temperature Waste Heat Harvesting , 2015 .

[22]  H. Scherrer,et al.  Thermoelectric properties of semi-conducting compound Zn4Sb3 , 2008 .

[23]  Y. Gan,et al.  Joining highly conductive and oxidation resistant silver-based electrode materials to silicon for high temperature thermoelectric energy conversions , 2013 .

[24]  Mohamed S. El-Genk,et al.  High efficiency segmented thermoelectric unicouple for operation between 973 and 300 K , 2003 .

[25]  B. Balke,et al.  Phase separation as a key to a thermoelectric high efficiency. , 2013, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[26]  Gang Chen,et al.  Enhanced thermoelectric figure of merit of p-type half-Heuslers. , 2011, Nano letters.

[27]  G. J. Snyder,et al.  Reevaluation of PbTe1−xIx as high performance n-type thermoelectric material , 2011 .

[28]  Rasmus Bjørk,et al.  The Universal Influence of Contact Resistance on the Efficiency of a Thermoelectric Generator , 2015, Journal of Electronic Materials.

[29]  Xinbing Zhao,et al.  High figures of merit and natural nanostructures in Mg2Si0.4Sn0.6 based thermoelectric materials , 2008 .

[30]  P. Ziolkowski,et al.  Estimation of Thermoelectric Generator Performance by Finite Element Modeling , 2010 .

[31]  K. Nishio,et al.  The Use of Transition-Metal Silicides to Reduce the Contact Resistance Between the Electrode and Sintered n-Type Mg2Si , 2012, Journal of Electronic Materials.

[32]  M. Kanatzidis,et al.  Electrical contact fabrication and measurements of metals and alloys to thermoelectric materials , 2007 .

[33]  Lidong Chen,et al.  Microstructure Contact Studies for Skutterudite Thermoelectric Devices , 2011 .

[34]  D. Rowe.  Thermoelectrics Handbook , 2005 .

[35]  G. J. Snyder,et al.  Copper ion liquid-like thermoelectrics. , 2012, Nature materials.

[36]  K. Bartholomé,et al.  Module Geometry and Contact Resistance of Thermoelectric Generators Analyzed by Multiphysics Simulation , 2010 .