Narration and Legitimation: The Case of in Vitro Fertilization

This article draws on a conceptualization of the link between science and politics based on discourse analysis. The public objects of science are theorized as discursive creatures. This political concept encapsulates the predetermination of politics by scientific discourse. This framework has been used to study the legitimation of in vitro fertilization in the UK. Through different linguistic and textual mechanisms the discourse of reproductive biology constructed IVF as a technology acceptable to actors of various persuasions. The article focuses on one such mechanism, namely, narration. The first successful fertilization of human eggs in vitro was immediately reported in a popular scientific article. This article is analysed by means of sequential theory and narrative semiotics. The story is then put in relation with parliamentary discourse on IVF.

[1]  B. Latour.  The pasteurization of France , 1988 .

[2]  B. Latour.  We Have Never Been Modern , 1991 .

[3]  R. Fowler,et al.  Human embryos in the laboratory. , 1970, Scientific American.

[4]  C. Licoppe.  The Crystallization of a New Narrative Form in Experimental Reports (1660–1690) , 1994, Science in Context.

[5]  J. Dijck.  Manufacturing Babies and Public Consent: Debating the New Reproductive Technologies , 1994 .

[6]  A. Corten.  Pentecostalism in Brazil , 1999 .

[7]  B. Latour,et al.  Essai de science-fabrication , 1983 .

[8]  M. Mulkay.  The Embryo Research Debate: Science and the Politics of Reproduction , 1997 .

[9]  Greg Myers,et al.  Writing biology : texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge , 1990 .

[10]  R. Curtis.  Narrative Form and Normative Force: Baconian Story-Telling in Popular Science , 1994 .

[11]  Eve Seguin.  The UK BSE crisis: Strengths and weaknesses of existing conceptual approaches , 2000 .

[12]  D. Smilde,et al.  Pentecostalism in Brazil: Emotion of the Poor and Theological Romanticism , 1999 .

[13]  Alan G. Gross,et al.  The rhetoric of science , 1990 .

[14]  R. Whitley,et al.  Expository Science: Forms and Functions of Popularisation , 1985 .

[15]  D. Entwisle,et al.  Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular.@@@Sociolinguistic Patterns. , 1975 .

[16]  R. Edwards.  Fertilization of Human Eggs in Vitro: Morals, Ethics and the Law , 1974, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[17]  C. D. Wenden.  Le discours politique , 1988 .

[18]  S. Squier.  Babies in bottles : twentieth-century visions of reproductive technology , 1994 .

[19]  B. Latour.  The Impact of Science Studies on Political Philosophy , 1991 .

[20]  S. Montgomery.  Codes and combat in biomedical discourse , 1991 .

[21]  J. Heslot.  Récit et commentaire dans un article scientifique , 1983 .

[22]  È. Seguin.  Bloor, Latour, and the field , 2000 .

[23]  J. Dyck.  Manufacturing Babies and Public Consent , 1995 .

[24]  Nicole Everaert-Desmdt.  Sémiotique du récit , 2000 .

[25]  Diffusion et vulgarisation : itinéraires du texte scientifique , 1986 .

[26]  Greg Myers,et al.  A Night with Saturn , 1992 .

[27]  B. Latour.  Politiques de la nature : comment faire entrer les sciences en démocratie , 1999 .

[28]  J. Faye.  Théorie du récit : introduction aux langages totalitaires , 1972 .

[29]  M. Mcneil,et al.  The New Reproductive Technologies , 1990 .