Individual and combined effects of land use and weeds on Cry1Ab/c protein expression and yield of transgenic cry1Ab/c rice

ABSTRACT Considering the anticipated commercial exploitation of insect-resistant transgenic rice and that the planting area of cultivated rice overlaps with wild rice, simulating an escape of transgenic rice from farmlands and exploring its fitness after entering semi-natural or natural ecosystems through uncontrolled seed dispersal or gene flow are critical to understand the resulting potential long-term environmental risks. The expression of foreign Cry1Ab/c protein and vegetative and reproductive fitness of insect-resistant transgenic rice Huahui1 (HH1) and its parental-line Minghui63 (MH63) were studied under four treatments combining land use and weed competition: farmland and uncultivated land under weed control (F-NW and U-NW, respectively), and farmland and uncultivated land without weed control (F-W and U-W, respectively). The expression of Cry1Ab/c was significantly lower in U-NW, F-W, and U-W than that in the control treatment, F-NW. Except for plant height, key vegetative (tiller number and biomass) and reproductive (grain number and grain weight per plant) growth indices of transgenic HH1 were significantly lower than those of the parental-line MH63 in F-NW and U-NW, indicating a significant fitness cost. In F-W and U-W, vegetative growth indices (plant height, tiller number, and biomass) were similar in HH1 and MH63; however, key reproductive indices including seed-set rate were significantly higher in HH1 than in MH63, indicating significant fitness benefits. Although these results support large-scale cultivation of insect-resistant transgenic rice in China, the ecological risk involved is high in farmland or uncultivated land without weed control (F-W and U-W).

[1]  Xiaoling Song,et al.  Fitness Cost of Transgenic cry1Ab/c Rice Under Saline-Alkaline Soil Condition , 2018, Front. Plant Sci..

[2]  Chengfang Li,et al.  Comparison of transgenic Bt rice and its non‐Bt counterpart in adaptability to nitrogen deficiency , 2018 .

[3]  L. Cai,et al.  Phloem transport capacity of transgenic rice T1c-19 (Cry1C*) under several potassium fertilizer levels , 2018, PloS one.

[4]  Chengfang Li,et al.  Comparison of transgenic Bt rice and their non-Bt counterpart in yield and physiological response to drought stress , 2018 .

[5]  Xiaochun Ge,et al.  Overexpressing Exogenous 5-Enolpyruvylshikimate-3-Phosphate Synthase (EPSPS) Genes Increases Fecundity and Auxin Content of Transgenic Arabidopsis Plants , 2018, Front. Plant Sci..

[6]  Zhongning Zhang,et al.  Effects of Soil Water Deficit on Insecticidal Protein Expression in Boll Shells of Transgenic Bt Cotton and the Mechanism , 2017, Front. Plant Sci..

[7]  S. Dong,et al.  Persistence of transgenes in wild rice populations depends on the interaction between genetic background of recipients and environmental conditions , 2017 .

[8]  Shuai Zhang,et al.  Effects of Soil Salinity on the Expression of Bt Toxin (Cry1Ac) and the Control Efficiency of Helicoverpa armigera in Field-Grown Transgenic Bt Cotton , 2017, PloS one.

[9]  B. Lu,et al.  Limited ecological risk of insect-resistance transgene flow from cultivated rice to its wild ancestor based on life-cycle fitness assessment , 2016 .

[10]  Xuan Chen,et al.  Transgenic Bt (Cry1Ab/Ac) rice lines with different genetic backgrounds exhibit superior field performance under pesticide-free environment , 2016 .

[11]  B. Lu,et al.  Efficacy of insect-resistance Bt/CpTI transgenes in F5–F7 generations of rice crop–weed hybrid progeny: implications for assessing ecological impact of transgene flow , 2015 .

[12]  Yongbo Liu,et al.  Characterization of competitive interactions in the coexistence of Bt-transgenic and conventional rice , 2015, BMC Biotechnology.

[13]  ang Jianga,et al.  ssessment of yield advantages of Bt-MH 63 with cry 1 C * or cry 2 A * enes over MH 63 ( Oryza sativa L . ) under different pest control modes , 2015 .

[14]  M. Brewer,et al.  A Comparison of Bt Transgene, Hybrid Background, Water Stress, and Insect Stress Effects on Corn Leaf and Ear Injury and Subsequent Yield , 2014, Environmental entomology.

[15]  Chengfang Li,et al.  Assessment of yield advantages of Bt-MH63 with cry1C* or cry2A* genes over MH63 (Oryza sativa L.) under different pest control modes , 2014 .

[16]  Chengfang Li,et al.  Yield changes of Bt-MH63 with cry1C * or cry2A * genes compared with MH63 (Oryza sativa) under different nitrogen levels , 2013 .

[17]  Yuan Chen,et al.  The effects of the relative humidity on the insecticidal expression level of Bt cotton during bolling period under high temperature , 2012 .

[18]  S. Peng,et al.  Effects of N treatments on the yield advantage of Bt-SY63 over SY63 (Oryza sativa) and the concentration of Bt protein , 2012 .

[19]  S. Peng,et al.  Yield differences between Bt transgenic rice lines and their non-Bt counterparts, and its possible mechanism , 2012 .

[20]  Amarjeet Singh,et al.  Detrimental effect of expression of Bt endotoxin Cry1Ac on in vitro regeneration, in vivo growth and development of tobacco and cotton transgenics , 2011, Journal of Biosciences.

[21]  Wei Wang,et al.  Enhanced yield performance of Bt rice under target-insect attacks: implications for field insect management , 2011, Transgenic Research.

[22]  B. Lu,et al.  Yield benefit and underlying cost of insect-resistance transgenic rice: Implication in breeding and deploying transgenic crops , 2010 .

[23]  D. J. Rogers,et al.  Potential Impact of Differential Production of the Cry2Ab and Cry1Ac Proteins in Transgenic Cotton in Response to Cold Stress , 2010, Journal of economic entomology.

[24]  E. Badea,et al.  Results regarding the levels of Cry1Ab protein in transgenic corn tissue (MON810) and the fate of Bt protein in three soil types , 2010 .

[25]  B. Lu,et al.  Gene flow from genetically modified rice to its wild relatives: Assessing potential ecological consequences. , 2008, Biotechnology advances.

[26]  Weijiang Li,et al.  Individual and combined effects of salinity and waterlogging on Cry1Ac expression and insecticidal efficacy of Bt cotton , 2008 .

[27]  I. Altosaar,et al.  Inheritance and field performance of transgenic Korean Bt rice lines resistant to rice yellow stem borer , 2008, Euphytica.

[28]  Wei Tang,et al.  Development of insect-resistant transgenic indica rice with a synthetic cry1C* gene , 2006, Molecular Breeding.

[29]  Mingcai Zhang,et al.  NaCl salinity stress decreased Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) protein content of transgenic Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) seedlings , 2006 .

[30]  A. Snow,et al.  Effects of insect-resistance transgenes on fecundity in rice (Oryza sativa, Poaceae): a test for underlying costs , 2006 .

[31]  E. Finnegan,et al.  Season-Long Variation in Expression of Cry1Ac Gene and Efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis Toxin in Transgenic Cotton Against Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) , 2005, Journal of economic entomology.

[32]  Bin Wang,et al.  Fitness estimation through performance comparison of F1 hybrids with their parental species Oryza rufipogon and O. sativa. , 2004, Annals of botany.

[33]  I. Altosaar,et al.  Agronomic and morphological characterization of Agrobacterium-transformed Bt rice plants , 2002, Euphytica.

[34]  J. Adamczyk,et al.  Potential factors impacting season-long expression of Cry1Ac in 13 commercial varieties of Bollgard® cotton , 2001, Journal of insect science.

[35]  Cai-guo Xu,et al.  Field performance of transgenic elite commercial hybrid rice expressing Bacillus thuringiensis δ-endotoxin , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.

[36]  M. Rice,et al.  Bt and non-Bt maize growth and development as affected by temperature and drought stress. , 2000 .

[37]  M. Arnold,et al.  HYBRID FITNESS IN THE LOUISIANA IRISES: ANALYSIS OF PARENTAL AND F1 PERFORMANCE , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[38]  C. N. Stewart,et al.  Increased fitness of transgenic insecticidal rapeseed under insect selection pressure , 1997 .