An Empirical Comparison of the Predictive Validity of Self-Explicated, Huber-Hybrid, Traditional Conjoint, and Hybrid Conjoint Models

The authors compare the predictive validity of different types of self-explicated, Huber-hybrid, traditional conjoint, and hybrid conjoint models. The results indicate that traditional and hybrid conjoint models outperform the self-explicated and Huber-hybrid models but are comparable in predictive validity terms. A sharp drop in validity measures from calibration to validation predictions is observed for all the models except those of the self-explicated category.

[1]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Model Misspecification in Multiattribute Parameter Estimation , 1981 .

[2]  S. Neslin Linking Product Features to Perceptions: Self-Stated versus Statistically Revealed Importance Weights , 1981 .

[3]  M. Holbrook Integrating Compositional and Decompositional Analyses to Represent the Intervening Role of Perceptions in Evaluative Judgments , 1981 .

[4]  Paul E. Green,et al.  A General Approach to Product Design Optimization via Conjoint Analysis , 1981 .

[5]  C. Whan Park,et al.  Consumers’ Decision Plans and Subsequent Choice Behavior , 1981 .

[6]  Paul E. Green,et al.  A Hybrid Utility Estimation Model for Conjoint Analysis , 1981 .

[7]  Franklin Acito,et al.  Evaluation of Conjoint Analysis Results: A Comparison of Methods , 1980 .

[8]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  A Comparison of the Internal Validity of Alternative Parameter Estimation Methods in Decompositional Multiattribute Preference Models , 1979 .

[9]  Roger M. Heeler,et al.  Attribute Importance: Contrasting Measurements , 1979 .

[10]  Chassin Mr The containment of hospital costs: a strategic assessment. , 1978 .

[11]  P. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook , 1978 .

[12]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Robustness of Conjoint Analysis: Some Monté Carlo Results , 1978 .

[13]  F. Acito Consumer Decision Making and Health Maintenance Organizations: A Review , 1978, Medical care.

[14]  Paul E. Green,et al.  An Interaction Model of Consumer Utility , 1975 .

[15]  George P. Huber,et al.  Multi-Attribute Utility Models: A Review of Field and Field-Like Studies , 1974 .

[16]  J. O. McClain,et al.  Trade-offs and conflicts in evaluation of health system alternatives: methodology for analysis. , 1974, Health services research.

[17]  William L. Wilkie,et al.  Issues in Marketing's use of Multi-Attribute Attitude Models , 1973 .

[18]  Paul E. Green,et al.  On the Analysis of Interactions in Marketing Research Data , 1973 .

[19]  Yoram Wind,et al.  Subjective evaluation models and conjoint measurement , 1972 .

[20]  David L. Ford,et al.  An empirical comparison of five utility models for predicting job preferences , 1971 .

[21]  G. Huber,et al.  A study of self‐explicated utility models , 1970 .

[22]  H. J. Einhorn The use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models in decision making. , 1970, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  David L. Ford,et al.  A study of subjective evaluation models , 1969 .

[24]  C. Hulin,et al.  Use of importance as a weighting component of job satisfaction. , 1968, The Journal of applied psychology.