Adaptation of Oral Processing to the Fracture Properties of Soft Solids

Hardness and rubberiness are distinct textural properties that are associated with extended oral processing times and therefore of interest to designing food structure for specific textural properties. Model food gels were developed with (1) increasing strength/hardness and constant deformability or (2) increasing deformability/rubberiness within a limited range of strength. Gel structures were characterized based on mechanical properties and the muscle activity (electromyography) and mandibular movements (three-dimensional jaw tracking) required for oral processing. Increased strength or deformability required more chewing cycles and increased muscle activity to breakdown samples for swallowing. In contrast, jaw movement amplitude increased in all directions with increased strength and remained constant or decreased with increased deformability. Specific mechanical properties that were correlated with oral processing parameters changed as chewing progressed, possibly reflecting a change in dominate mechanical properties and sensory perception during oral processing. Practical Applications A fundamental understanding of how food structure determines sensory texture is essential to designing foods that are healthy and desirable to consumers. Oral processing, from first bite through swallowing, is the main physiological element of texture evaluation. Model soft solid foods with increasing strength/hardness or deformability/rubberiness were developed and characterized by mechanical tests and oral processing. Mastication of harder or more deformable structures required different chewing movements in bolus preparation. The specific mechanical properties relating to oral processing may change during the chewing sequence.

[1]  J. K. Whitfield,et al.  STRUCTURAL FAILURE IN SELECTED RAW FRUITS AND VEGETABLES , 1980 .

[2]  H. H. Kleizen,et al.  Distribution of particle sizes in food comminuted by human mastication. , 1984, Archives of oral biology.

[3]  Beverly Bishop,et al.  Effect of gum hardness on chewing pattern , 1986, Experimental Neurology.

[4]  J. P. Lund,et al.  Evidence that periodontal pressoreceptors provide positive feedback to jaw closing muscles during mastication. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  J. Zarzycki Critical stress intensity factors of wet gels , 1988 .

[6]  P. Lillford,et al.  THE PERCEPTION OF FOOD TEXTURE ‐ THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE BREAKDOWN PATH , 1988 .

[7]  Tsutomu Harada,et al.  Electromyographic Measurement of Textural Changes of Foodstuffs during Chewing , 1989 .

[8]  A. van der Bilt,et al.  The Effect of Particle Size Reduction on the Jaw Gape in Human Mastication , 1991, Journal of dental research.

[9]  A P Slagter,et al.  Force-deformation properties of artificial and natural foods for testing chewing efficiency. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[10]  W. Hylander,et al.  Modelling relative masseter force from surface electromyograms during mastication in non-human primates. , 1993, Archives of oral biology.

[11]  Wendy E. Brown,et al.  CHARACTERISATION OF PATTERNS OF CHEWING BEHAVIOUR IN HUMAN SUBJECTS AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON TEXTURE PERCEPTION , 1994 .

[12]  S. L. Ogin,et al.  THE EFFECT OF FILLER VOLUME FRACTION ON THE FRACTURE-TOUGHNESS OF A MODEL FOOD COMPOSITE , 1994 .

[13]  H. Macfie,et al.  Method to investigate differences in chewing behaviour in humans. II: Use of electromyography during chewing to assess chewing behaviour , 1994 .

[14]  M. Peyron,et al.  Bite force displayed during assessment of hardness in various texture contexts. , 1995, Archives of oral biology.

[15]  A. van der Bilt,et al.  The Role of Sensory Information in the Control of Rhythmic Open-Close Movements in Humans , 1995, Journal of dental research.

[16]  Marie-Agnès Peyron,et al.  Masticatory jaw movement recordings: A new method to investigate food texture , 1996 .

[17]  K. Hiiemae,et al.  Natural bites, food consistency and feeding behaviour in man. , 1996, Archives of oral biology.

[18]  G. Throckmorton,et al.  The effects of bolus size and chewing rate on masticatory performance with artificial test foods. , 1997, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[19]  P. Lucas,et al.  Mechanical properties of foods responsible for resisting food breakdown in the human mouth. , 1997, Archives of oral biology.

[20]  P. Lucas,et al.  Food Properties that Influence Neuromuscular Activity During Human Mastication , 1998, Journal of dental research.

[21]  Electromyographic study on cooked rice with different amylose contents , 1998 .

[22]  Wendy E. Brown,et al.  USE OF COMBINED ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESTHESIOLOGY DURING MASTICATION TO CHART THE ORAL BREAKDOWN OF FOODSTUFFS: RELEVANCE TO MEASUREMENT OF FOOD TEXTURE , 1998 .

[23]  Jean-François Martin,et al.  Training and Sensory Judgment Effects on Mastication as Studied by Electromyography , 1998 .

[24]  Y. Shiau,et al.  Evaluation of biting performance with standardized test-foods. , 1999, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[25]  P. Bourdiol,et al.  Variations in human masseter and temporalis muscle activity related to food texture during free and side-imposed mastication. , 1999, Archives of oral biology.

[26]  C. Daubert,et al.  COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LARGE STRAIN METHODS FOR ASSESSING FAILURE CHARACTERISTICS OF SELECTED FOOD GELS , 2000 .

[27]  E. Dransfield,et al.  Variability of the masticatory process during chewing of elastic model foods. , 2000, European journal of oral sciences.

[28]  Kirk R. Johnson,et al.  Symphyseal fusion and jaw-adductor muscle force: an EMG study. , 2000, American journal of physical anthropology.

[29]  P. Lucas,et al.  The effects of food fragmentation index on mandibular closing angle in human mastication. , 2000, Archives of oral biology.

[30]  D. V. Boger,et al.  Rheological characterisation of κ-carrageenan/locust bean gum mixtures , 2001 .

[31]  A. Woda,et al.  Effects of increased hardness on jaw movement and muscle activity during chewing of visco-elastic model foods , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  P. Lucas,et al.  Food physics and oral physiology , 2002 .

[33]  J. Meullenet,et al.  MEASUREMENT OF BITING VELOCITIES, AND PREDETERMINED AND INDIVIDUAL CROSSHEAD SPEED INSTRUMENTAL IMITATIVE TESTS FOR PREDICTING CHEESE HARDNESS , 2002 .

[34]  H. Hayasaki,et al.  The effects of bolus hardness on masticatory kinematics. , 2002, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[35]  J. Benedito,et al.  Comparison of electromyographic pattern of sensory experts and untrained subjects during chewing of Mahon cheese , 2002, Journal of Dairy Research.

[36]  G. Throckmorton,et al.  Bolus size and unilateral chewing cycle kinematics. , 2004, Archives of oral biology.

[37]  J. Abbink,et al.  Swallowing threshold and masticatory performance in dentate adults , 2004, Physiology & Behavior.

[38]  Peter W. Lucas,et al.  FOOD TEXTURE AND ITS EFFECT ON INGESTION, MASTICATION AND SWALLOWING , 2004 .

[39]  A. van der Bilt,et al.  The influence of product and oral characteristics on swallowing. , 2005, Archives of oral biology.

[40]  K. Foster,et al.  Effect of texture of plastic and elastic model foods on the parameters of mastication. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  E. Foegeding,et al.  POLYACRYLAMIDE GELS AS ELASTIC MODELS FOR FOOD GELS: FRACTURE PROPERTIES AFFECTED BY DEXTRAN AND GLYCEROL , 2006 .

[42]  E. Foegeding,et al.  Textural properties of agarose gels. I. Rheological and fracture properties , 2006 .

[43]  D. D. Hamann,et al.  ANALYSIS OF COMPRESSION, TENSION AND TORSION FOR TESTING FOOD GEL FRACTURE PROPERTIES* , 2006 .

[44]  E. Foegeding,et al.  SENSORY TEXTURE RELATED TO LARGE‐STRAIN RHEOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF AGAR/GLYCEROL GELS AS A MODEL FOOD , 2006 .

[45]  E. Foegeding Rheology and sensory texture of biopolymer gels , 2007 .

[46]  Christine E Wall,et al.  Patterns of variation across primates in jaw-muscle electromyography during mastication. , 2008, Integrative and comparative biology.

[47]  H. D. de Jongh,et al.  Colloidal aspects of texture perception. , 2009, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[48]  Jianshe Chen Food oral processing - a review. , 2009 .

[49]  C. Graaf,et al.  Slow food, fast food and the control of food intake , 2010, Nature Reviews Endocrinology.

[50]  M. Mars,et al.  Texture, not flavor, determines expected satiation of dairy products , 2011, Appetite.

[51]  G. Essick,et al.  EVALUATION OF TEXTURE CHANGES DUE TO COMPOSITIONAL DIFFERENCES USING ORAL PROCESSING , 2012 .