Being and feeling unique: statistical deviance and psychological marginality.

Two studies tested the hypothesis that people with culturally stigmatized and concealable conditions (e.g., gays, epileptics, juvenile delinquents, and incest victims) would be more likely to feel unique than people with culturally valued or conspicuous conditions (e.g., the physically attractive, the intellectually gifted, the obese, and the facially scarred). In Study 1, culturally stigmatized individuals with concealable conditions were least likely to perceive consensus between their personal preferences and those of others. In Study 2, they were most likely to describe themselves as unique and to make these self-relevant decisions quickly. Marginality is a psychological reality, not just a statistical one, for those with stigmatized and concealable "master status" conditions.

[1]  W. Mcguire,et al.  Salience of ethnicity in the spontaneous self-concept as a function of one's ethnic distinctiveness in the social environment. , 1978, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  H. Markus,et al.  Stability and malleability of the self-concept. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  Norman Miller,et al.  Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: an empirical and theoretical review , 1987 .

[4]  C. Scherbaum,et al.  Marginal and mindful: deviants in social interactions. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  L. Ross,et al.  The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes , 1977 .

[6]  W. Vogel,et al.  A test of the optimal level of arousal theory of sensation seeking. , 1982, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  R. Moreland,et al.  Role of the self-concept in the perception of others. , 1985 .

[8]  A. L. Beaman,et al.  Effects of deindividuation variables on stealing among Halloween trick-or-treaters. , 1976 .

[9]  S. Bem.  Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. , 1981 .

[10]  E. Sampson.  Psychology and the American ideal. , 1977 .

[11]  Richard C. Sherman,et al.  Memory for persuasive messages: A test of a schema-copy-plus-tag model. , 1984 .

[12]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[13]  Patricia Webbink.  Nonverbal Behavior and Lesbian/Gay Orientation , 1981 .

[14]  J. Crocker,et al.  Depression, social comparison, and the false-consensus effect. , 1983, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  L. Brown.  New Voices, New Visions: Toward A Lesbian/Gay Paradigm for Psychology , 1989 .

[16]  Steven J. Sherman,et al.  Mechanisms Underlying the False Consensus Effect , 1984 .

[17]  Brian Mullen,et al.  The false consensus effect: A meta-analysis of 115 hypothesis tests , 1985 .

[18]  J. D. Campbell.  Similarity and uniqueness: the effects of attribute type, relevance, and individual differences in self-esteem and depression. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  J. Suls,et al.  In search of the false-uniqueness phenomenon: fear and estimates of social consensus. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  H. Triandis,et al.  Individualism and Collectivism: Cross-cultural Perspectives on Self-ingroup Relationships We Wish to Thank Our Research Collaborators for Stimulating Ideas, Data, and Moral Support in Carrying out a Complex Set of Studies. They , 2022 .

[21]  A. Stewart,et al.  The course of individual adaptation to life changes. , 1982, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  M. Fine,et al.  Disability Beyond Stigma: Social Interaction, Discrimination, and Activism , 1988 .

[23]  G. Frank,et al.  Beyond Stigma: Visibility and Self‐Empowerment of Persons with Congenital Limb Deficiencies , 1988 .

[24]  E. Sampson.  The debate on individualism: Indigenous psychologies of the individual and their role in personal and societal functioning. , 1988 .

[25]  William J. McGuire,et al.  Effects of household sex composition on the salience of one's gender in the spontaneous self-concept. , 1979 .

[26]  Thomas Gilovich,et al.  Causal focus and estimates of consensus: An examination of the false-consensus effect. , 1983 .

[27]  R. Mann,et al.  The other way around: Effects of causal attributions on estimates of consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency , 1979 .

[28]  H. Markus,et al.  Self-schemas and gender. , 1982 .

[29]  C. Maslach,et al.  Social and personal bases of individuation. , 1974, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  E. C. Hughes.  Dilemmas and Contradictions of Status , 1945, American Journal of Sociology.

[31]  Gary Marks,et al.  Thinking One's Abilities Are Unique and One's Opinions Are Common , 1984 .

[32]  H. Markus.  Self-schemata and processing information about the self. , 1977 .

[33]  H. Fromkin.  Effects of experimentally aroused feelings of undistinctiveness upon valuation of scarce and novel experiences. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.