Control-structure interaction in precision pointing servo loops

The control-structure interaction problem is addressed via stability analysis of a generic linear servo loop model. With the plant described by the rigid body mode and a single elastic mode, structural flexibility is categorized into one of three types: (1) appendage, (2) in-the-loop minimum phase, and (3) in-the-loop nonminimum phase. Closing the loop with proportional-derivative (PD) control action and introducing sensor roll-off dynamics in the feedback path, stability conditions are obtained. Trade studies are conducted with modal frequency, modal participation, modal damping, loop bandwidth, and sensor bandwidth treated as free parameters. Results indicate that appendage modes are most likely to produce instability if they are near the sensor rolloff, whereas in-the-loop modes are most dangerous near the loop bandwidth. The main goal of this paper is to provide a fundamental understanding of the control-structure interaction problem so that it may benefit the design of complex spacecraft and pointing system servo loops. In this framework, the JPL Pathfinder gimbal pointer is considered as an example.

[1]  R. Edmunds,et al.  Robust control system design techniques for large flexible space structures having non-colocated sensors and actuators , 1983 .

[2]  Charles E. Bell,et al.  Soft Mounted Momentum Compensated Pointing System For The Space Shuttle Orbiter , 1987, Other Conferences.

[3]  R. H. Cannon,et al.  Experiments in control of flexible structures with noncolocated sensors and actuators , 1984 .

[4]  W. Gevarter Basic relations for control of flexible vehicles , 1969 .

[5]  Bong Wie,et al.  A New Concept of Generalized Structural Filtering for Active Vibration Control Synthesis , 1987 .

[6]  Loren I. Slafer,et al.  Control System Design in the Presence of Severe Structural Dynamics Interactions , 1978 .

[7]  T. K. Caughey,et al.  On the stability problem caused by finite actuator dynamics in the collocated control of large space structures , 1985 .

[8]  Charles E. Bell,et al.  Mariner Mark II - Spacecraft control for the 1990's and beyond , 1987 .

[9]  Edward F. Crawley,et al.  Dynamics and control of multipayload platforms: The middeck active control experiment (MACE) , 1991 .

[10]  B. Wie,et al.  Attitude stabilization of flexible spacecraft during stationkeeping maneuvers , 1983 .

[11]  B. K. Wada,et al.  Equivalent spring-mass system for normal modes , 1971 .

[12]  P. W. Likins,et al.  Dynamics and Control of Flexible Space Vehicles , 1970 .

[13]  R. A. Laskin,et al.  Future Payload Isolation and Pointing System Technology , 1986 .

[14]  E. H. Kopf,et al.  Flexible stator control on the Galileo spacecraft , 1979 .

[15]  M. Balas,et al.  Feedback control of flexible systems , 1978 .

[16]  Giacomo Porcelli,et al.  Attitude control of flexible space vehicles , 1972 .