Upper and lower visual field differences in perceptual asymmetries

A leftward spatial bias has been observed with visuospatial attention tasks, including line bisection and the greyscales task. Upper and lower visual field differences have been observed on various tasks, with a lower visual field advantage occurring for motion, global processing and coordinate spatial judgments. Upper visual field advantages occur for visual search, local processing and categorical judgments. In perceptual asymmetries research, upper and lower visual field differences have not typically been scored separately, as most presentations have been central. Mixed results have made it difficult to determine whether lateral biases are stronger in the upper or the lower visual field. As length of presentation time differed in prior studies, this factor was examined to determine whether it would lead differential biases to emerge in each visual field. The greyscales task was used to investigate the interaction of visual field and presentation time within subjects (N=43). Eye tracking was used during the task and supported the hypothesis of a stronger left bias in the lower visual field. Presentation time and visual field interacted to influence performance. Prolonged presentation led to a stronger leftward bias in the lower visual field whereas the leftward bias was stronger in the upper visual field during brief presentation. Results showed a relation between the lower and left visual fields and the upper and right visual fields, which has not previously been shown in perceptual asymmetries. Further, it is suggested that functional differences between the visual streams could underlie the visual field differences in perceptual asymmetries.

[1]  M. Posner,et al.  Research on attention networks as a model for the integration of psychological science. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[2]  J. Marshall,et al.  Individual variation in line bisection: A study of normal subjects with application to the interpretation of visual neglect , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  G. Dellatolas,et al.  Visual and motor components in simple line bisection: an investigation in normal adults. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[4]  Gail Kuslansky,et al.  Hand preference and performance effects on line bisection , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  Matia Okubo Right movies on the right seat: Laterality and seat choice , 2010 .

[6]  M. Nicholls,et al.  The nature and contribution of space- and object-based attentional biases to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  M. McCourt,et al.  Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  M. Nicholls,et al.  Can Free-Viewing Perceptual Asymmetries be Explained by Scanning, Pre-Motor or Attentional Biases? , 2002, Cortex.

[9]  J. Marshall,et al.  Left neglect for near but not far space in man , 1991, Nature.

[10]  M. Nicholls,et al.  Are object- and space-based attentional biases both important to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries? , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  S. Kosslyn Seeing and Imagining in the Cerebral Hemispheres: A Computational Approach , 1988 .

[12]  M. Kinsbourne,et al.  Eye and Head Turning Indicates Cerebral Lateralization , 1972, Science.

[13]  K. M. Heilman,et al.  Contributions of the left and right cerebral hemispheres to line bisection , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  G. J. van der Wildt,et al.  Contrast sensitivity as a function of position on the retina , 1980, Vision Research.

[15]  Yaffa Yeshurun,et al.  Covert attention increases spatial resolution with or without masks: support for signal enhancement. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[16]  K. Zilles,et al.  Line bisection judgments implicate right parietal cortex and cerebellum as assessed by fMRI , 2000, Neurology.

[17]  M. Nicholls,et al.  Things that go bump in the right: The effect of unimanual activity on rightward collisions , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  M. Hiscock,et al.  Is there a sex difference in human laterality? III. An exhaustive survey of tactile laterality studies from six neuropsychology journals. , 1999, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[19]  M. Nicholls,et al.  The Effect of Body and Environment-Centred Coordinates on Free-Viewing Perceptual Asymmetries for Vertical and Horizontal Stimuli , 2006, Cortex.

[20]  Peter McGeorge,et al.  A lateralized bias in mental imagery: Evidence for representational pseudoneglect , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.

[21]  J. G. Braun,et al.  Line bisection performance of normal adults , 1999, Neurology.

[22]  A. Hof,et al.  Walking trajectory in neglect patients. , 2006, Gait & Posture.

[23]  M. Nicholls,et al.  A stimulus-dependent dissociation between the cerebral hemispheres under free-viewing conditions , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  K. Heilman,et al.  Horizontal line bisections in upper and lower body space , 2000, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[25]  Louise Lakha,et al.  Lower visual field advantage for motion segmentation during high competition for selection. , 2005, Spatial vision.

[26]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Neuroimaging Studies of Attention: From Modulation of Sensory Processing to Top-Down Control , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Roberto Cubelli,et al.  Selective spatial attention and length representation in normal subjects and in patients with unilateral spatial neglect , 1989, Brain and Cognition.

[28]  J. Beaumont,et al.  Line bisection in normal adults: direction of attentional bias for near and far space , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  Stephen D. Christman,et al.  Chapter 9 The relation between left-right and upper-lower visual field asymmetries , 1997 .

[30]  P. Reuter-Lorenz,et al.  Vertical orienting control: evidence for attentional bias and "neglect" in the intact brain. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[31]  F. Previc,et al.  Visual search asymmetries in three-dimensional space , 1993, Vision Research.

[32]  K. Heilman,et al.  Neglect and Related Disorders , 1984, Seminars in neurology.

[33]  K M Heilman,et al.  Peripersonal and vertical neglect. , 1990, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[34]  M. Bryden,et al.  Handedness and eye-dominance: a meta-analysis of their relationship. , 1996, Laterality.

[35]  M. Nicholls,et al.  An investigation of the relationship between free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for vertical and horizontal stimuli. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[36]  Ian H. Robertson,et al.  Walking trajectory and hand movements in unilateral left neglect: A vestibular hypothesis , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  R. Rafal,et al.  Axis-based neglect of visual shapes , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[38]  S. Christman,et al.  Upper and lower visual field differences in categorical and coordinate judgments , 1998 .

[39]  Michael E R Nicholls,et al.  Satisfaction Guaranteed , 2006, Psychological science.

[40]  G. Holmes DISTURBANCES OF VISUAL ORIENTATION , 1918, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[41]  Markus A. Maier,et al.  Context specificity of implicit preferences: the case of human preference for red. , 2009, Emotion.

[42]  K. Zilles,et al.  Neural consequences of acting in near versus far space: a physiological basis for clinical dissociations. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[43]  Manfred Clynes,et al.  Sentics: The touch of emotions , 1977 .

[44]  K. Heilman,et al.  Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task , 1980, Neuropsychologia.

[45]  J. Driver,et al.  Can Visual Neglect Operate in Object-centred Co-ordinates? An Affirmative Single-case Study , 1991 .

[46]  Joan E. Foley,et al.  The selective utilization of information in the optic array , 1976, Psychological research.

[47]  Daniel C. Javitt,et al.  Right hemisphere control of visuospatial attention: line-bisection judgments evaluated with high-density electrical mapping and source analysis☆ , 2003, NeuroImage.

[48]  M. Nicholls,et al.  Free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for the judgement of brightness, numerosity and size , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[49]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Spatial neglect in near and far space investigated by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[50]  K. Mullen The contrast sensitivity of human colour vision to red‐green and blue‐yellow chromatic gratings. , 1985, The Journal of physiology.

[51]  S. Nieuwenhuis,et al.  The role of the magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in the attentional blink , 2008, Brain and Cognition.

[52]  R. B. Post,et al.  On the origin of vertical line bisection errors. , 2006, Spatial vision.

[53]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Covert attention affects the psychometric function of contrast sensitivity , 2002, Vision Research.

[54]  R. Cowie,et al.  Variation among Nonclinical Subjects on a Line-Bisection Task , 1998, Perceptual and motor skills.

[55]  M. Nicholls,et al.  The greyscales task: a perceptual measure of attentional bias following unilateral hemispheric damage , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[56]  Elena Amenedo,et al.  Vertical asymmetries in pre-attentive detection of changes in motion direction. , 2007, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[57]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  On the nature of near space: Effects of tool use and the transition to far space , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[58]  M. P. Bryden,et al.  Patterns of cerebral organization , 1983, Brain and Language.

[59]  V. Candas,et al.  Time-on-task effect in pseudoneglect , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[60]  A. Milner,et al.  Line bisection errors in visual neglect: Misguided action or size distortion? , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[61]  M. P. Bryden,et al.  Choosing sides: The left and right of the normal brain. , 1990 .

[62]  Michael E. R. Nicholls,et al.  Rightward collisions and their association with pseudoneglect , 2008, Brain and Cognition.

[63]  W Klotz,et al.  The effect of a masked stimulus on the response to the masking stimulus , 1995, Psychological research.

[64]  J. Marshall,et al.  The history and clinical presentation of neglect , 2013 .

[65]  G. Lennerstrand,et al.  CENTRAL AND PERIPHERAL NORMAL CONTRAST SENSITIVITY FOR STATIC AND DYNAMIC SINUSOIDAL GRATINGS , 1983, Acta ophthalmologica.

[66]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Dissociable Coordinate Frames of Unilateral Spatial Neglect: “Viewer-Centered” Neglect , 1998, Brain and Cognition.

[67]  Individual differences in susceptibility to memory illusions , 1998 .

[68]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Stimulus-centered neglect in reading and object recognition , 2000 .

[69]  E. Bisiach,et al.  Unilateral Neglect of Representational Space , 1978, Cortex.

[70]  U. Ansorge,et al.  Shifts of visuospatial attention to invisible (metacontrast-masked) singletons: Clues from reaction times and event-related potential , 2006 .

[71]  Jane E. Raymond,et al.  Directional anisotropy of motion sensitivity across the visual field , 1994, Vision Research.

[72]  David S. Vogel,et al.  Cerebral lateralization of spatial abilities: A meta-analysis , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[73]  W. H. Payne Visual Reaction Times on a Circle about the Fovea , 1967, Science.

[74]  M. McCourt,et al.  Centripetal versus centrifugal bias in visual line bisection: focusing attention on two hypotheses. , 2000, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[75]  Paul J. Eslinger,et al.  Perceptual–attentional and motor-intentional bias in near and far space , 2008, Brain and Cognition.

[76]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  Hemispheric control of spatial attention , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[77]  Mazyar Fallah,et al.  A Color Hierarchy for Automatic Target Selection , 2010, PloS one.

[78]  A Kirk,et al.  A representational vertical bias , 1994, Neurology.

[79]  E. Yund,et al.  Detectability as a function of target location: Effects of spatial configuration , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[80]  P. Halligan,et al.  The effects of stimulus size on bisection judgements in near and far space , 2003 .

[81]  Joseph A. Bellizzi,et al.  Environmental color, consumer feelings, and purchase likelihood , 1992 .

[82]  E. Brodie,et al.  Is left always right? Directional deviations in visual line bisection as a function of hand and initial scanning direction , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[83]  Mark E. McCourt,et al.  Asymmetries of Visuospatial Attention are Modulated by Viewing Distance and Visual Field Elevation: Pseudoneglect in Peripersonal and Extrapersonal Space , 2000, Cortex.

[84]  A. Rubens Caloric stimulation and unilateral visual neglect , 1985, Neurology.

[85]  Darren R Gitelman,et al.  ILAB: A program for postexperimental eye movement analysis , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[86]  E. Yund,et al.  Scanning the visual field without eye movements—A sex difference , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[87]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  A left-sided visuospatial bias in birds , 2005, Current Biology.

[88]  C. Gutwin,et al.  Directional collisions during a route-following task , 2009, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[89]  J. Pujol,et al.  Cerebral lateralization of language in normal left-handed people studied by functional MRI , 1999, Neurology.

[90]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Spatial representation of words in the brain implied by studies of a unilateral neglect patient , 1990, Nature.

[91]  Benoit Brisson,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence of central interference in the control of visuospatial attention , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[92]  Jon Driver,et al.  Preserved figure-ground segregation and symmetry perception in visual neglect , 1992, Nature.

[93]  D Regan,et al.  Visual field defects for vergence eye movements and for stereomotion perception. , 1986, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[94]  R. Mehta,et al.  Blue or Red? Exploring the Effect of Color on Cognitive Task Performances , 2009, Science.

[95]  F. Prete Stimulus configuration and location in the visual field affect appetitive responses by the praying mantis, Sphodromantis lineola (Burr.) , 1993, Visual Neuroscience.

[96]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Superior Parietal Cortex Activation During Spatial Attention Shifts and Visual Feature Conjunction , 1995, Science.

[97]  M. McCourt Performance consistency of normal observers in forced-choice tachistoscopic visual line bisection , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[98]  M. McCourt,et al.  Cognitive and perceptual influences on visual line bisection: Psychophysical and chronometric analyses of pseudoneglect , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[99]  M. Imbert,et al.  Scanning direction and line bisection: a study of normal subjects and unilateral neglect patients with opposite reading habits. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[100]  J. O'regan,et al.  Is there a systematic location for the pseudo-fovea in patients with central scotoma? , 1993, Vision Research.

[101]  Ke Zhou,et al.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture by equiluminant color change , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[102]  R. Knight,et al.  Brain Activity During Landmark and Line Bisection Tasks , 2008, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[103]  L. Elias,et al.  Do perceptual asymmetries differ in peripersonal and extrapersonal space? , 2009, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[104]  Mark E. McCourt,et al.  Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulusmodulation of pseudoneglect , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[105]  M. Nicholls,et al.  Prism adaptation overcomes pseudoneglect for the greyscales task , 2009, Cortex.

[106]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  A framework for interpreting distinct patterns of hemispatial neglect , 1995 .

[107]  M. Hiscock,et al.  Is there a sex difference in human laterality? III. An exhaustive survey of tactile laterality studies from six neuropsychology journals. , 1994 .

[108]  Argye E. Hillis,et al.  Right hemispatial neglect: Frequency and characterization following acute left hemisphere stroke , 2007, Brain and Cognition.

[109]  S. Heywood,et al.  Structure of the Visual Array and Saccadic Latency: Implications for Oculomotor Control* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[110]  Karen R Dobkins,et al.  Attentional weighting: a possible account of visual field asymmetries in visual search? , 2004, Spatial vision.

[111]  L. Rueckert,et al.  Context effects in pseudo‐neglect measured with a free vision Landmark task , 2004, Laterality.

[112]  J. Marshall,et al.  Spatial cognition: evidence from visual neglect , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[113]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[114]  G. Mangun,et al.  Functional Neuroimaging of Attention , 2001 .

[115]  I. THE ATTENTION SYSTEM OF THE HUMAN BRAIN , 2002 .

[116]  DH Hubel,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[117]  Mark E. McCourt,et al.  The Influence of Unimanual Response on Pseudoneglect Magnitude , 2001, Brain and Cognition.

[118]  M. Niemeier,et al.  Paradoxical cross-over due to attention to high or low spatial frequencies , 2008, Brain and Cognition.

[119]  B. Schiff,et al.  Effect of unilateral contraction of hand muscles on perceiver biases in the perception of chimeric and neutral faces , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[120]  M. Neppi-Modona,et al.  Object-centred pseudoneglect for non-verbal visual stimuli , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[121]  S. Christman Cerebral asymmetries in sensory and perceptual processing , 1997 .

[122]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Is it only humans that count from left to right? , 2010, Biology Letters.

[123]  M. Gur,et al.  Isoluminant stimuli may not expose the full contribution of color to visual functioning: Spatial contrast sensitivity measurements indicate interaction between color and luminance processing , 1992, Vision Research.

[124]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Enhanced Perception of Illusory Contours in the Lower Versus Upper Visual Hemifields , 1996, Science.

[125]  L. Regolin The Case of the Line-Bisection: When Both Humans and Chickens Wander Left , 2006, Cortex.

[126]  L. Elias,et al.  Footedness is a better predictor than is handedness of emotional lateralization , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[127]  J. Findlay,et al.  Saccades to targets in three-dimensional space: Dependence of saccadic latency on target location , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[128]  K. Luh Line bisection and perceptual asymmetries in normal individuals: What you see is not what you get. , 1995 .

[129]  J. Hamm,et al.  Differences in paper-and-pencil versus computerized line bisection according to ADHD subtype and hand-use , 2008, Brain and Cognition.

[130]  D. Perani,et al.  The anatomy of unilateral neglect after right-hemisphere stroke lesions. A clinical/CT-scan correlation study in man , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[131]  M. Goodale,et al.  An evolving view of duplex vision: separate but interacting cortical pathways for perception and action , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[132]  E. Loftus,et al.  Errors in autobiographical memory. , 1998, Clinical psychology review.

[133]  L. Elias,et al.  Free Viewing Perceptual Asymmetry for Distance Judgments: Objects in Right Hemispace are Closer than They Appear , 2010, The International journal of neuroscience.

[134]  Graham K Edgar,et al.  Hemifield Differences in Perceived Spatial Frequency , 1990, Perception.

[135]  Gina M. Grimshaw,et al.  Attentional and Intentional Factors in Pseudoneglect , 2000 .

[136]  K M Heilman,et al.  Performance On hemispatial pointing task by patients with neglect syndrome , 1983, Neurology.

[137]  Joshua M. Carlson,et al.  Backward Masked Snakes and Guns Modulate Spatial Attention , 2009 .

[138]  Markus A. Maier,et al.  CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Color and Psychological Functioning , 2022 .

[139]  Charles M. Butter,et al.  Altitudinal Neglect Following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Case Report , 1989, Cortex.

[140]  K. Welch,et al.  Cerebral control of directed visual attention and orienting saccades. , 1990, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[141]  P. McGeorge,et al.  Lateral bumping: A normal-subject analog of the behaviour of patients with hemi-spatial neglect? , 1998 .

[142]  I P Howard,et al.  Human Horizontal Optokinetic Nystagmus Elicited by the Upper Versus the Lower Visual Fields , 1989, Visual Neuroscience.

[143]  D. Hubel,et al.  Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. , 1988, Science.

[144]  S. Christman Local-global processing in the upper versus lower visual fields , 1993 .

[145]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Bihemispheric Leftward Bias in a Visuospatial Attention-Related Network , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[146]  K. Zilles,et al.  The Neural Basis of Vertical and Horizontal Line Bisection Judgments: An fMRI Study of Normal Volunteers , 2001, NeuroImage.

[147]  Isabelle S. Häberling,et al.  Cerebral Asymmetries: Complementary and Independent Processes , 2010, PloS one.

[148]  C. Landis Determinants of the critical flicker-fusion threshold. , 1954, Physiological reviews.

[149]  W. R. Brain VISUAL DISORIENTATION WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO LESIONS OF THE RIGHT CEREBRAL HEMISPHERE , 1941 .

[150]  M. Kinsbourne The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. , 1970, Acta psychologica.

[151]  F. Previc Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[152]  M. Nicholls,et al.  Trunk- and head-centred spatial coordinates do not affect free-viewing perceptual asymmetries , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[153]  Matthias Niemeier,et al.  The exploration of space and objects in neglect , 2002 .

[154]  J. Bradshaw,et al.  Bisecting rods and lines: Effects of horizontal and vertical posture on left-side underestimation by normal subjects , 1985, Neuropsychologia.

[155]  Glenn D. Wilson,et al.  AROUSAL PROPERTIES OF RED VERSUS GREEN , 1966 .

[156]  I. Keller,et al.  Visuospatial neglect in near and far space: dissociation between line bisection and letter cancellation , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[157]  Dirk Kerzel,et al.  Visually guided movements to color targets , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[158]  K. Heilman,et al.  Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect , 1979, Annals of neurology.

[159]  D. Grossi,et al.  On Selective Left Neglect during Walking in a Child , 2001, Brain and Cognition.

[160]  David R Badcock,et al.  Asymmetries in the Sensitivity to Motion in Depth: A Centripetal Bias , 1993, Perception.

[161]  S. Chokron,et al.  Pseudoneglect and reversed pseudoneglect among left-handers and right-handers , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[162]  W Vingiano,et al.  Pseudoneglect on a cancellation task. , 1991, The International journal of neuroscience.

[163]  J. Mattingley,et al.  To see or not to see: The effects of visible and invisible cues on line bisection judgements in unilateral neglect , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[164]  F H Previc,et al.  Discriminability of random-dot stereograms in three-dimensional space. , 1995, The International journal of neuroscience.

[165]  Markus A. Maier,et al.  Color and psychological functioning: the effect of red on performance attainment. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[166]  A. Milner,et al.  To halve and to halve not: An analysis of line bisection judgements in normal subjects , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[167]  Billy E. Pennal,et al.  Human cerebral asymmetry in color discrimination , 1977, Neuropsychologia.

[168]  Winfried Schlee,et al.  Top-Down Modulation of the Auditory Steady-State Response in a Task-Switch Paradigm , 2008, Front. Hum. Neurosci..