Comparative study of laser-induced plasma emission from microjoule picosecond and nanosecond KrF-laser pulses

Abstract In this paper, the emission of laser produced silicon and aluminum plasmas is investigated in the energy range from 0.1 to 100 μJ (0.5–500 J/cm 2 ) using 10 ns and 50 ps KrF laser pulses focused to a 5 μm diameter spot. For energies higher than 3 μJ, there is little difference between 50 ps and 10 ns pulses in the plasma emission both in terms of the intensity of the emission lines and in terms of lifetime of the emission. Differences become significant only at very low fluences approaching the plasma formation threshold, which is significantly lower for 50 ps pulses than for 10 ns pulses. Calculations using a plasma ablation model show that initial plasma conditions are significantly different for 50 ps and 10 ns pulses during irradiation by the laser pulses. However, the dominant process leading to plasma emission at later times is from expansion and cooling of the plasma plume in the form of a blast wave in the ambient air which is primarily dependent on the energy deposited in the plasma and not the pulse length. Calibrations have also been carried out in order to give the emission in absolute numbers of photons emitted and thus facilitate the comparison with modeling and future experiments.

[1]  Mark A. Berg,et al.  Some Comparisons of LIBS Measurements Using Nanosecond and Picosecond Laser Pulses , 2001 .

[2]  S. Mao,et al.  Initiation of an early-stage plasma during picosecond laser ablation of solids , 2000 .

[3]  Mohamed Chaker,et al.  Temporal characterization of femtosecond laser pulses induced plasma for spectrochemical analysis of aluminum alloys , 2001 .

[4]  Xianglei Mao,et al.  The physics of laser ablation in microchemical analysis. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[5]  Mikhail A. Bolshov,et al.  A comparison of nanosecond and femtosecond laser-induced plasma spectroscopy of brass samples , 2000 .

[6]  Paolo Cielo,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Aluminum Alloys by Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy and Plasma Characterization , 1995 .

[7]  C J Sansonetti,et al.  Irradiances of spectral lines in mercury pencil lamps. , 1996, Applied optics.

[8]  H Takuma,et al.  UV saturable absorber for short-pulse KrF laser systems. , 1989, Optics letters.

[9]  Dynamics of an air breakdown plasma on a solid surface during picosecond laser ablation , 2000 .

[10]  J. Laserna,et al.  Diagnostics of silicon plasmas produced by visible nanosecond laser ablation , 2001 .

[11]  J. A. Aguilera,et al.  Two-Dimensional Spatial Distribution of the Time-Integrated Emission from Laser-Produced Plasmas in Air at Atmospheric Pressure , 1997 .

[12]  S. Michael Angel,et al.  Energy Dependence of Emission Intensity and Temperature in a LIBS Plasma Using Femtosecond Excitation , 2001 .

[13]  Robert Fedosejevs,et al.  keV x-ray source based on high-repetition-rate excimer-laser-produced plasmas (Poster Paper) , 1992, Advanced Lithography.

[14]  D. Cremers,et al.  Effect of Sampling Geometry on Elemental Emissions in Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy , 1996 .

[15]  Robert Fedosejevs,et al.  Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy for Microanalysis Using Submillijoule UV Laser Pulses , 2002 .

[16]  P. Mora Theoretical model of absorption of laser light by a plasma , 1982 .

[17]  James E. Bayfield,et al.  Plasmas and laser light , 1975 .

[18]  J. Laserna,et al.  Experimental determination of laser induced breakdown thresholds of metals under nanosecond Q-switched laser operation , 1998 .

[19]  H. Brode Numerical Solutions of Spherical Blast Waves , 1955 .

[20]  G. Taylor The formation of a blast wave by a very intense explosion I. Theoretical discussion , 1950, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[21]  Patrick Mauchien,et al.  Evaluation of laser ablation optical emission spectrometry for microanalysis in aluminium samples , 1996 .