How to quantify knee function after total knee arthroplasty?

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is being undertaken in a younger population than before and as a result the functional demands on the knee are likely to be increasing. As a consequence, it is important to define quantitative functional knee tests that can monitor any increase. A valuable functional knee test has to be able to distinguish small differences (selectivity) and has to be independent of pain (content validity). In this study, patient-based questionnaires (WOMAC and Knee Society score) and performance-based tests (sit-to-stand movement, maximal isometric contraction and timed-up-and-go) were used to assess which of these tests are selective and valid to measure knee function. Tests were considered to be selective if they could discriminate between knee patients and healthy control subjects, and to have functional content validity if they were relatively independent of pain. Twenty-eight patients were measured 16 months after surgery and compared to a healthy control group of 31 subjects. The sit-to-stand movement and timed-up-and-go test were both selective and functionally content valid. The timed-up-and-go test can be used for a quick initial assessment of global function and the sit-to-stand movement as a more biomechanical instrument identifying how the knee function of the patient is affected.

[1]  L. Snyder-Mackler,et al.  Voluntary activation and decreased force production of the quadriceps femoris muscle after total knee arthroplasty. , 2003, Physical therapy.

[2]  P. Patrician,et al.  Single-item graphic representational scales. , 2004, Nursing research.

[3]  F. Su,et al.  Rising from chair after total knee arthroplasty. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[4]  C. A. Jones,et al.  Determinants of function after total knee arthroplasty. , 2003, Physical therapy.

[5]  J. Petit,et al.  Kinematic and electromyographic analysis of rising from a chair during a "Sit-to-Walk" task in elderly subjects: role of strength. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[6]  Johan Kärrholm,et al.  The effect of tibial insert design on rising from a chair; motion analysis after total knee replacement. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[7]  T. Thornhill,et al.  Total knee arthroplasty with the PFC system. Results at a minimum of ten years and survivorship analysis. , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  Edward C. Jones,et al.  Measuring improvement following total hip and knee arthroplasty using patient-based measures of outcome. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  P. Herberts,et al.  Outcome of Total Hip Replacement: A Comparison of Different Measurement Methods , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  Robert L Kane,et al.  The functional outcomes of total knee arthroplasty. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  J. Perry,et al.  Rising from a chair. Influence of age and chair design. , 1985, Physical therapy.

[12]  Analysis of rising from a chair after total knee arthroplasty. , 1998, Bulletin (Hospital for Joint Diseases (New York, N.Y.)).

[13]  Najia Shakoor,et al.  Nonrandom evolution of end-stage osteoarthritis of the lower limbs. , 2002, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[14]  Functional evaluation of the TKA patient using the coordination and variability of rising. , 2007, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[15]  F. Awiszus,et al.  Improvement of voluntary quadriceps muscle activation after total knee arthroplasty. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  R L Wixson,et al.  Functional outcome and patient satisfaction in total knee patients over the age of 75. , 1996, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[17]  J. Kärrholm,et al.  Knee scoring systems in gonarthrosis. Evaluation of interobserver variability and the envelope of bias. Score Assessment Group. , 1997, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[18]  L. Snyder-Mackler,et al.  Altered loading during walking and sit‐to‐stand is affected by quadriceps weakness after total knee arthroplasty , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[19]  R. V. van Lummel,et al.  The accuracy of measuring the kinematics of rising from a chair with accelerometers and gyroscopes. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  N. Pradhan,et al.  Survivorship analysis of 3234 primary knee arthroplasties implanted over a 26-year period: a study of eight different implant designs. , 2008, The Knee.

[21]  Henk J. Stam,et al.  Analysis and decomposition of accelerometric signals of trunk and thigh obtained during the sit-to-stand movement , 2005, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[22]  C. Terwee,et al.  Self-reported physical functioning was more influenced by pain than performance-based physical functioning in knee-osteoarthritis patients. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[23]  G. Pyka,et al.  Effect of muscle strength and movement speed on the biomechanics of rising from a chair in healthy elderly and young women. , 1998, Gait & posture.

[24]  P. Stratford,et al.  Does parallel item content on WOMAC's Pain and Function Subscales limit its ability to detect change in functional status? , 2004, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[25]  Arnold D. M. Kester,et al.  Functional improvement after unicompartmental knee replacement: a follow-up study with a performance based knee test , 2007, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[26]  P. Stratford,et al.  Performance measures were necessary to obtain a complete picture of osteoarthritic patients. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[27]  Rosalind J Wright,et al.  Validity and Responsiveness of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in Comparisonwith the SF-36 and WOMAC , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[28]  P. Dieppe,et al.  Total knee replacement: is it really an effective procedure for all? , 2007, The Knee.

[29]  James G Wright,et al.  Comparison of a generic and a disease-specific measure of pain and physical function after knee replacement surgery. , 1995, Medical care.

[30]  T. Andriacchi,et al.  The influence of total knee-replacement design on walking and stair-climbing. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[31]  P. Stratford,et al.  Comparison of gender and group differences in self-report and physical performance measures in total hip and knee arthroplasty candidates. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[32]  Diane Podsiadlo,et al.  The Timed “Up & Go”: A Test of Basic Functional Mobility for Frail Elderly Persons , 1991, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.