Impact of probabilistic risk assessment and severe accident research in reducing reactor risk

Abstract The development of probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) as a safety analysis tool and the implementation of lessons learned from risk studies in the design, operation and regulation of nuclear power plants has resulted in a substantial reduction in reactor risk. The lack of a strong technical basis for realistically assessing severe accident behavior, including the release and transport of radionuclides to the environment, resulted in some conservatism in early risk studies that distorted the true nature of severe accident risk. This paper describes the evolution of PRA over the past four decades, the benefits that have been achieved in the reduction of reactor risk, and the changes in the perspective of the nature of severe accident risk associated with the development of a strong technical basis for assessing severe accident consequences. Based on these developments, we conclude that the probability of early containment failure leading to a large, early release of radioactive material to the environment was over stated in these early risk studies. Although it is not possible to preclude the possibility of offsite early fatalities in a severe accident, the probability is extremely small, perhaps below the level at which it should be a key consideration in regulatory oversight. Conversely, as highlighted by the Fukushima accident, the potential for the societal impacts of land contamination represents an important element of reactor accident risk that has received insufficient consideration in the past. These findings have implications regarding preferred strategies for emergency planning and appropriate metrics for risk-informed regulation.

[1]  R. Zeyen,et al.  The Phebus Fission Product and Source Term International Programmes , 2005 .

[2]  L. W. Deitrich.  A review of experiments and results from the transient reactor test (TREAT) facility. , 1998 .

[3]  Vinod Mubayi,et al.  Insights into the Societal Risk of Nuclear Power Plant Accidents. , 2017, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[4]  Mohammad Modarres,et al.  A historical overview of probabilistic risk assessment development and its use in the nuclear power industry: a tribute to the late Professor Norman Carl Rasmussen , 2005, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  Louis Baker,et al.  Studies Of Metal-Water Reactions At High Temperatures. Iii. Experimental And Theoretical Studies Of The Zirconium-Water Reaction , 1962 .

[6]  W. D. Rowe,et al.  Risk Assessment Review Group Report to the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[7]  L. T. Ritchie,et al.  Technical guidance for siting criteria development , 1982 .

[8]  F. Jacq,et al.  The ASTEC Integral Code for Severe Accident Simulation , 2009 .

[9]  C. R. Hyman,et al.  MELCOR computer code manuals , 2015 .

[10]  T. G. Theofanous,et al.  The probability of alpha-mode containment failure , 1995 .

[11]  Amico.  An approach to the quantification of seismic margins in nuclear power plants: The importance of BWR plant systems and functions to seismic margins , 1985 .

[12]  Larry J. Ott,et al.  BWRSAR calculations of reactor vessel debris pours for peach bottom short-term station blackout , 1990 .

[13]  Harold A. Mitchell,et al.  The IDCOR Program—Severe Accident Issues, Individual Plant Examinations and Source Term Developments , 1987 .

[14]  P. M. Schumacher,et al.  Source Term Code Package: a user's guide (Mod 1) , 1986 .

[15]  J. K. Hohorst,et al.  Role of RELAP/SCDAPSIM in Nuclear Safety , 2010 .

[16]  Ali Mosleh,et al.  A systematic procedure for the incorporation of common cause events into risk and reliability models , 1986 .

[17]  R.Y. Lee,et al.  Accident source terms for Light-Water Nuclear Power Plants. Final report , 1995 .

[18]  Mitchell Rogovin,et al.  Three Mile Island : a report to the Commissioners and to the public , 1980 .

[19]  A. D. Swain.  Accident Sequence Evaluation Program: Human reliability analysis procedure , 1987 .

[20]  Division on Earth.  Lessons Learned from the Fukushima Nuclear Accident for Improving Safety of U.S. Nuclear Plants , 2014 .

[21]  Division on Earth.  Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2 , 2006 .

[22]  B. John Garrick,et al.  Quantifying and Controlling Catastrophic Risks , 2008 .

[23]  J. J. DiNunno,et al.  CALCULATION OF DISTANCE FACTORS FOR POWER AND TEST REACTOR SITES , 1962 .

[24]  A. Introduction,et al.  AN APPROACH FOR USING PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT IN RISK-INFORMED DECISIONS ON PLANT- SPECIFIC CHANGES TO THE LICENSING BASIS , 2009 .

[25]  James W. Johnson,et al.  The US NRC's accident sequence precursor program: an overview and development of a Bayesian approach to estimate core damage frequency using precursor information , 1996 .