Governing the swarm: Controlling a bio-hybrid society of bees & robots with computational feedback loops

Bio-hybrid systems in which living organisms interact and self-organize with multi-robot systems are a novel approach in engineering and biology. We show here how a group of honeybees and robots can interact in collective decision making and how computer code that adds feedback loops to the system may affect the global system properties. This study contains a series of experiments with living honeybees and robots as well as a cellular-automaton inspired model that is simple, yet still in good agreement with the empirical findings presented here. Using this model, we explore the most likely candidates for local parameters in the proximate mechanisms of the animals, thus further the understanding of this natural system in a context that is relevant for such bio-hybrid manifestations. We identify positive feedback based on bee-to-bee collision and temperature as an important factor governing collective decision making and found the stopping probability after close-encounters among bees as a crucial local parameter. This study is the first step towards using computer and robotic technology to monitor and control complex animal societies like honeybees.

[1]  F. Iacoponi,et al.  Combination of thymol treatment (Apiguard®) and caging the queen technique to fight Varroa destructor , 2015, Apidologie.

[2]  V. Bičík,et al.  The effectiveness of thermotherapy in the elimination of Varroa destructor , 2016 .

[3]  Herbert Heran,et al.  Untersuchungen über den Temperatursinn der Honigbiene (Apis mellifica) unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Wahrnehmung strahlender Wärme , 1952, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[4]  Gordon Hunter,et al.  A User-Centred Design Approach Towards Developing an Intelligent Living Environment for Honeybees , 2016, BCS HCI.

[5]  Thomas Schmickl,et al.  A cellular model of swarm intelligence in bees and robots , 2017 .

[6]  Serge Kernbach,et al.  ASSISI: Mixing Animals with Robots in a Hybrid Society , 2013, Living Machines.

[7]  D. Goulson,et al.  Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers , 2015, Science.

[8]  I. Fries,et al.  Research strategies to improve honeybee health in Europe , 2010, Apidologie.

[9]  Thomas Schmickl,et al.  From honeybees to robots and back: division of labour based on partitioning social inhibition , 2015, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[10]  Michele Magno,et al.  Big brother for bees (3B) — Energy neutral platform for remote monitoring of beehive imagery and sound , 2015, 2015 6th International Workshop on Advances in Sensors and Interfaces (IWASI).

[11]  Scott Camazine,et al.  Collective decisions and cognition in bees , 1999, Nature.

[12]  Serge Kernbach,et al.  Re-embodiment of Honeybee Aggregation Behavior in an Artificial Micro-Robotic System , 2009, Adapt. Behav..

[13]  Thomas Schmickl,et al.  Dynamics of Collective Decision Making of Honeybees in Complex Temperature Fields , 2013, PloS one.

[14]  Yann Clough,et al.  Bee pollination improves crop quality, shelf life and commercial value , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  D. Sumpter,et al.  From nonlinearity to optimality: pheromone trail foraging by ants , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  T. Seeley,et al.  Dancing bees tune both duration and rate of waggle-run production in relation to nectar-source profitability , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[17]  Thomas Schmickl,et al.  Coordination of collective behaviours in spatially separated agents , 2015, ECAL.

[18]  Damjan Miklic,et al.  Combined actuator sensor unit for interaction with honeybees , 2015, 2015 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS).

[19]  Stjepan Bogdan,et al.  A robotic system for researching social integration in honeybees , 2017, PloS one.

[20]  Michele Magno,et al.  b+WSN: Smart beehive with preliminary decision tree analysis for agriculture and honey bee health monitoring , 2016, Comput. Electron. Agric..