Evaluating the influence of landform, surficial geology, and land use on streams using hydrologic simulation modeling

Abstract.Land use and geology are two important extrinsic factors regulating the structure and function of stream ecosystems. The interactions among these two landscape-scale factors on streams are, however, poorly understood. To determine the effects of these factors on stream flow, sediment, and nutrients, we analyzed 72 ungaged, agricultural watersheds in Minnesota and Michigan using the hydrologic model SWAT (the Soil Water Assessment Tool). The watersheds differed in surficial geology (landform) and land use, but were of similar size, with streams ranging from 2nd to 3rd order. SWAT was developed for use on ungaged basins, but to improve the outputs we used US Geological Survey discharge data from sites near our study watersheds for calibration. We found seasonal and annual differences in flow and nutrient and sediment loading across different land forms and land use types. Watersheds with greater amounts of row-crop agriculture and watersheds dominated by morainal landforms were associated with more sediment and nutrients and greater flow volumes and flashiness. Multivariate analyses identified at least nine landscape variables which were related to nutrients, sediment, and flow, although the responses varied between Minnesota and Michigan. Results also indicated the possibility of a threshold effect for row crop agricultural. Increases in this land use had little additional effect on nutrients or flow when percent row crop exceeds the threshold value. At moderate to high levels of row crop agriculture, watersheds appeared to show greater sensitivity to differences in landform.

[1]  Carl Richards,et al.  Landscape influences on water chemistry in Midwestern stream ecosystems , 1997 .

[2]  C. L. Matsch,et al.  Minnesota's geology , 1982 .

[3]  M. Billett,et al.  The influence of parent material on small-scale spatial changes in streamwater chemistry in Scottish upland catchments , 1997 .

[4]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  Implications of Streamflow Variability and Predictability for Lotic Community Structure: A Regional Analysis of Streamflow Patterns , 1989 .

[5]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  Partial canonical correspondence analysis , 1988 .

[6]  P. Armitage,et al.  Biological Effects of Fine Sediment in the Lotic Environment , 1997, Environmental management.

[7]  G. Minshall,et al.  Stream Ecosystem Dynamics of the Salmon River, Idaho: An 8th-Order System , 1992, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[8]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  CANOCO - a FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by [partial] [etrended] [canonical] correspondence analysis, principal components analysis and redundancy analysis (version 2.1) , 1988 .

[9]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  A Theory of Gradient Analysis , 2004 .

[10]  P. Dillon,et al.  The effects of geology and land use on the export of phosphorus from watersheds , 1975 .

[11]  I. Schlosser.  Flow regime, juvenile abundance, and the assemblage structure of stream fishes , 1985 .

[12]  Todd A. Crowl,et al.  The relationship between land use and physicochemistry, food resources and macroinvertebrate communities in tributaries of the Taieri River, New Zealand: a hierarchically scaled approach , 1997 .

[13]  John R. Williams,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1 , 1998 .

[14]  T. Tamm,et al.  Nutrient runoff dynamics in a rural catchment: influence of land-use changes, climatic fluctuations and ecotechnological measures , 2000 .

[15]  Thomas F. Cuffney,et al.  Responses of Physical, Chemical, and Biological Indicators of Water Quality to a Gradient of Agricultural Land Use in the Yakima River Basin, Washington , 2000 .

[16]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  PREDICTABILITY, CONSTANCY, AND CONTINGENCY OF PERIODIC PHENOMENA' , 1974 .

[17]  Carl Richards,et al.  Landscape-scale influences on stream habitats and biota , 1996 .

[18]  R. B. Corey,et al.  Phosphorus variations in surface runoff from agricultural lands as a function of land use. , 1980 .

[19]  R. Klein.  URBANIZATION AND STREAM QUALITY IMPAIRMENT , 1979 .

[20]  Stephen R. Workman,et al.  SIMULATION OF DAILY AND MONTHLY STREAM DISCHARGE FROM SMALL WATERSHEDS USING THE SWAT MODEL , 2000 .

[21]  Ronald L. Bingner,et al.  Runoff simulated from goodwin creek watershed using SWAT , 1996 .

[22]  J. Hamlett,et al.  Hydrologic calibration of the SWAT model in a watershed containing fragipan soils , 1998 .

[23]  Steven T. Bednarz,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART II: MODEL APPLICATION 1 , 1998 .

[24]  J. Newbold,et al.  Phosphorus Spiralling in a Woodland Stream: Seasonal Variations , 1985 .

[25]  S. Carpenter,et al.  NONPOINT POLLUTION OF SURFACE WATERS WITH PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN , 1998 .

[26]  Sabine Grunwald,et al.  Using the modified agricultural non-point source pollution model in German watersheds , 1999 .

[27]  Brian W. Mar,et al.  Effects of urbanization on small streams in the Puget Sound Lowland Ecoregion , 1996 .

[28]  J. Allan,et al.  Functional Organization of Stream Fish Assemblages in Relation to Hydrological Variability , 1995 .

[29]  Donald W. Meals,et al.  Watershed-scale response to agricultural diffuse pollution control programs in Vermont, USA , 1996 .

[30]  John Lyons,et al.  WATERSHED URBANIZATION AND CHANGES IN FISH COMMUNITIES IN SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN STREAMS 1 , 2000 .

[31]  Ter Braak,et al.  Canoco reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user''s guide: software for canonical community ord , 2002 .

[32]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Estimating hydrologic budgets for three Illinois watersheds , 1996 .

[33]  P. Pekárová,et al.  The impact of land use on stream water quality in Slovakia , 1996 .

[34]  W. Wichmann.  IFA world fertilizer use manual. , 1992 .

[35]  Paul W. Seelbach,et al.  Reconciling landscape and local views of aquatic communities: lessons from Michigan trout streams , 1997 .

[36]  J. Knox.  Agricultural influence on landscape sensitivity in the Upper Mississippi River Valley , 2001 .

[37]  A. Sharpley,et al.  Phosphorus export from an agricultural watershed: linking source and transport mechanisms. , 2001, Journal of environmental quality.

[38]  A. Sharpley,et al.  Phosphorus transport in overland flow in response to position of manure application. , 2002, Journal of environmental quality.

[39]  Arthur J. Gold,et al.  LANDSCAPE ATTRIBUTES AS CONTROLS ON GROITHD WATER NITRATE REMOVAL CAPACITY OF RIPARIAN ZONES 1 , 2001 .

[40]  T. Schueler.  The importance of imperviousness , 1995 .

[41]  G. Shearer,et al.  Fertilizer Nitrogen: Contribution to Nitrate in Surface Water in a Corn Belt Watershed , 1971, Science.

[42]  G. K. Felton.  Hydrologic response of a karst watershed , 1994 .

[43]  J. Lyons,et al.  Impacts of Urbanization on Stream Habitat and Fish Across Multiple Spatial Scales , 2001, Environmental management.

[44]  D. Meals.  Assessing Nonpoint Phosphorus Control in the LaPlatte River Watershed , 1993 .

[45]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  Update notes: Canoco, version 3.10 , 1990 .

[46]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  CANOCO Reference Manual and User's Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4) , 1998 .

[47]  Maja Brandt,et al.  Watershed modelling of nonpoint nitrogen losses from arable land to the Swedish coast in 1985 and 1994 , 2000 .

[48]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Water resources of the Texas Gulf Basin , 1999 .

[49]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .