Analysis of Navier–Stokes Codes Applied to Supersonic Retropropulsion Wind-Tunnel Test

Advancement of supersonic retropropulsion as a technology will rely heavily on the ability of computational methods to accurately predict vehicle aerodynamics during atmospheric descent, where supersonic retropropulsion will be employed. A wind-tunnel test at the NASA Langley Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel was specifically designed to aid in the support of Navier–Stokes codes for supersonic retropropulsion applications. Three computational fluid dynamics codes [data parallel line relaxation, fully unstructured Navier–Stokes three-dimensional, and overset grid flow solver] were exercised for multiple nozzle configurations for a range of freestream Mach numbers and nozzle thrust coefficients. The computational fluid dynamics pretest analysis of this wind-tunnel test aided in the test model design process by identifying the potential for tunnel blockage or unstart, of liquefaction within the plume, and of separation occurring at the internal fingers of the nozzles. This analysis led to a reduced model diameter, he...

[1]  T. Barth,et al.  A one-equation turbulence transport model for high Reynolds number wall-bounded flows , 1990 .

[2]  Robert D. Braun,et al.  Survey of Supersonic Retropropulsion Technology for Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing , 2009 .

[3]  Robert H. Nichols,et al.  Addition of Improved Shock-Capturing Schemes to OVERFLOW 2.1 , 2009 .

[4]  Robert L. Meakin,et al.  Automatic Off-Body Grid Generation for Domains of Arbitrary Size , 2001 .

[5]  Robert D. Braun,et al.  Performance Characterization of Supersonic Retropropulsion for High-Mass Mars Entry Systems , 2010 .

[6]  G. D. van Albada,et al.  A comparative study of computational methods in cosmic gas dynamics , 1982 .

[7]  Karl T. Edquist,et al.  Computational Fluid Dynamics Validation and Post-test Analysis of Supersonic Retropropulsion in the Ames 9x7 Unitary Tunnel , 2012 .

[8]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[9]  Scott M. Murman,et al.  An Interface for Specifying Rigid-Body Motions for CFD Applications , 2003 .

[10]  Kerry Trumble An Initial Assessment of Navier-Stokes Codes Applied to Supersonic Retro-Propulsion , 2010 .

[11]  Robert Meakin,et al.  Multiple-Body Proximate-Flight Simulation Methods , 2005 .

[12]  J. Edwards A low-diffusion flux-splitting scheme for Navier-Stokes calculations , 1997 .

[13]  David J. Kinney,et al.  Overview of the NASA Entry, Descent and Landing Systems Analysis Study , 2010 .

[14]  Robert D. Braun,et al.  High Mass Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing Architecture Assessment , 2009 .

[15]  F. Menter Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[16]  T. Pulliam,et al.  A diagonal form of an implicit approximate-factorization algorithm , 1981 .

[17]  Robert L. Meakin An Efficient Means of Adaptive Refinement Within Systems of Overset Grids , 1995 .

[18]  Reynaldo J. Gomez Best Practices in Overset Grid Generation , 2002 .

[19]  W. K. Anderson,et al.  Implicit/Multigrid Algorithms for Incompressible Turbulent Flows on Unstructured Grids , 1995 .

[20]  Robert H. Nichols,et al.  Solver and Turbulence Model Upgrades to OVERFLOW 2 for Unsteady and High-Speed Applications , 2006 .

[21]  Robert L. Meakin,et al.  Object X-Rays for Cutting Holes in Composite Overset Structured Grids , 2001 .

[22]  R. Manning,et al.  Mars Exploration Entry, Descent, and Landing Challenges , 2007 .

[23]  J. Benek,et al.  A 3-D Chimera Grid Embedding Technique , 1985 .

[24]  Graham V. Candler,et al.  The solution of the Navier-Stokes equations using Gauss-Seidel line relaxation , 1989 .

[25]  Thomas H. Pulliam,et al.  Implementation of Preconditioned Dual-Time Procedures in OVERFLOW , 2003 .