Optimization on tribological properties of aramid fibre and CaSO4 whisker reinforced non-metallic friction material with analytic hierarchy process and preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations

Abstract This paper develops an evaluation method based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations (PROMETHEE) in order to select the optimal material according to several criteria which are probably conflicting. The material formulations, which were non-metallic friction material modified with aramid fibre and CaSO 4 whisker by different weight, were designed based on the quasi-level uniform method and the friction test results in three typical conditions were considered as criteria for the performance assessment. By AHP, the subjective judgments of evaluators are quantified as the weight for each criterion, while PROMETHEE is employed to determine the complete ranking of the alternatives. Moreover, further results can be obtained from the application of geometrical analysis for interactive assistance (GAIA). The results show that the formula of 70 wt.% NBR modified PF with 12 wt.% CaSO 4 whisker and 4 wt.% aramid fibre exhibits the optimal properties.

[1]  Reza Baradaran Kazemzadeh,et al.  PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Yildiz Esra Albayrak,et al.  Using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to improve human performance: An application of multiple criteria decision making problem , 2004, J. Intell. Manuf..

[3]  Habib Chabchoub,et al.  PROMETHEE-MD-2T method for project selection , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Metin Dagdeviren,et al.  Decision making in equipment selection: an integrated approach with AHP and PROMETHEE , 2008, J. Intell. Manuf..

[5]  Malcolm James Beynon,et al.  The lean improvement of the chemical emissions of motor vehicles based on preference ranking: A PROMETHEE uncertainty analysis , 2008 .

[6]  Ho Jang,et al.  Synergistic effects of aramid pulp and potassium titanate whiskers in the automotive friction material , 2001 .

[7]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  DECISION MAKING WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS , 2008 .

[8]  Ho Jang,et al.  Friction and wear of friction materials containing two different phenolic resins reinforced with aramid pulp , 2000 .

[9]  Takahisa Kato,et al.  Friction Material Design for Brake Pads Using Database , 2001 .

[10]  P. Vincke,et al.  Note-A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making , 1985 .

[11]  M. A. Wright,et al.  Sensitivity series and friction surface analysis of non-metallic friction materials , 2006 .

[12]  Akbar Esfahanipour,et al.  Decision making in stock trading: An application of PROMETHEE , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Bhabani K. Satapathy,et al.  Performance of friction materials based on variation in nature of organic fibres: Part II. Optimisation by balancing and ranking using multiple criteria decision model (MCDM) , 2004 .

[14]  Jean Pierre Brans,et al.  HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS: THE PROMETHEE METHOD , 1986 .

[15]  T. Chou,et al.  Application of the PROMETHEE technique to determine depression outlet location and flow direction in DEM , 2004 .