Assessment of upper limb motor function in patients with multiple sclerosis using the Virtual Peg Insertion Test: A pilot study

Quantifying and tracking upper limb impairment is of key importance to the understanding of disease progress, establishing patient-tailored therapy protocols and for optimal care provision. This paper presents the results of a pilot study on the assessment of upper limb motor function in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) with the Virtual Peg Insertion Test (VPIT). The test consists in a goal-directed reaching task using a commercial haptic display combined with an instrumented handle and virtual environment, and allows for the extraction of objective kinematic and dynamic parameters. Ten MS patients and eight age-matched healthy subjects performed five repetitions of the VPIT with their dominant and non-dominant hand. Upper limb movements were found to be significantly slower, less smooth and less straight compared to healthy controls, and the time to complete the VPIT was well correlated with the conventional Nine Hole Peg Test (r=0.658, p<;0.01). Tremor in the range of 3-5 Hz could be detected and quantified using a frequency analysis in patients featuring intention tremor. These preliminary results illustrate the feasibility of using the VPIT with MS patients, and underline the potential of this test to evaluate upper limb motor function and discriminate characteristic MS related impairments.

[1]  B Pentland,et al.  Rater reliability of Fahn's tremor rating scale in patients with multiple sclerosis. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  N. Yozbatiran,et al.  Motor assessment of upper extremity function and its relation with fatigue, cognitive function and quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients , 2006, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[3]  D. Goodkin,et al.  Upper extremity function in multiple sclerosis: improving assessment sensitivity with box-and-block and nine-hole peg tests. , 1988, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  Chris Raymaekers,et al.  Arm training in Multiple Sclerosis using Phantom: Clinical relevance of robotic outcome measures , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[5]  Marko Munih,et al.  Upper limb motion analysis using haptic interface , 2001 .

[6]  R. Gassert,et al.  Upper limb assessment using a Virtual Peg Insertion Test , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[7]  A. Compston,et al.  Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines from the international panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis , 2001, Annals of neurology.

[8]  Ilse Lamers,et al.  Perceived and actual arm performance in multiple sclerosis: relationship with clinical tests according to hand dominance , 2013, Multiple sclerosis.

[9]  Slobodan Jaric,et al.  Hand function in multiple sclerosis: Force coordination in manipulation tasks , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  Farshid Amirabdollahian,et al.  Analysis of the results from use of haptic peg-in-hole task for assessment in neurorehabilitation , 2011 .

[11]  A. Guclu-Gunduz,et al.  Upper extremity function and its relation with hand sensation and upper extremity strength in patients with multiple sclerosis. , 2012, NeuroRehabilitation.

[12]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  Hannes Bleuler,et al.  Haptic/VR Assessment Tool for Fine Motor Control , 2010, EuroHaptics.

[14]  P Ketelaer,et al.  Validity of the TEMPA for the measurement of upper limb function in multiple sclerosis , 2002, Clinical rehabilitation.

[15]  R. Herndon,et al.  Movement disorders in multiple sclerosis , 1988, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[16]  Jan Hillert,et al.  High concurrent presence of disability in multiple sclerosis , 2007, Journal of Neurology.

[17]  W. Helsen,et al.  Intention tremor rated according to different finger-to-nose test protocols: a survey. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  P. Bain,et al.  Evaluation of three different ways of assessing tremor in multiple sclerosis , 2000, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[19]  Peter Feys,et al.  Digitised spirography as an evaluation tool for intention tremor in multiple sclerosis , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[20]  J. Kurtzke Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis , 1983, Neurology.

[21]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Adult Norms for the Nine Hole Peg Test of Finger Dexterity , 1985 .

[22]  Richard A. Rudick,et al.  The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite , 2010, Neurology.

[23]  L. Louca,et al.  Upper Limb Assessment of People With Multiple Sclerosis With the Use of a Haptic Nine-Hole Peg-Board Test , 2008 .

[24]  Etienne Burdet,et al.  Quantization of human motions and learning of accurate movements , 1998, Biological Cybernetics.