A Soft Handoff of Attention between Cerebral Hemispheres

Each cerebral hemisphere initially processes one half of the visual world. How are moving objects seamlessly tracked when they traverse visual hemifields? Covert tracking of lateralized objects evokes a difference between slow-wave electrophysiological activity observed from contralateral and ipsilateral electrodes in occipitoparietal regions. This event-related potentials (ERP) waveform, known as contralateral delay activity (CDA) [1, 2], is sensitive to the number of objects tracked [1, 2] and responds dynamically to changes in this quantity [3]. When a tracked object crosses the midline, an inversion in CDA polarity revealed the dropping of the object's representation by one hemisphere and its acquisition by the other. Importantly, our data suggest that the initially tracking hemisphere continues to represent the object for a period after that object crosses the midline. Meanwhile, the receiving hemisphere begins to represent the object before the object crosses the midline, leading to a period in which the object is represented by both hemispheres. Further, this overlap in representation is reduced if the midline crossing is unpredictable. Thus, this process is sensitive to observer expectations and does not simply reflect overlapping receptive fields near the midline.

[1]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[2]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[3]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity , 2004, Nature.

[4]  Kemal Fidanboylu,et al.  An Overview of Handoff Techniques in Cellular Networks , 2005 .

[5]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  Neural Measures of Dynamic Changes in Attentive Tracking Load , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Neuronal correlates of inferred motion in primate posterior parietal cortex , 1995, Nature.

[7]  D. Hubel,et al.  Cortical and callosal connections concerned with the vertical meridian of visual fields in the cat. , 1967, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Visual stability based on remapping of attention pointers , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  J. Polich,et al.  Cognitive and biological determinants of P300: an integrative review , 1995, Biological Psychology.

[10]  Marina Schmid,et al.  An Introduction To The Event Related Potential Technique , 2016 .

[11]  Julie D. Golomb,et al.  The Native Coordinate System of Spatial Attention Is Retinotopic , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap. , 1994 .

[13]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Eye movement artifact in the CNV. , 1970, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  E. Vogel,et al.  Neural Measures of Individual Differences in Selecting and Tracking Multiple Moving Objects , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[16]  S. Luck An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique , 2005 .

[17]  R. Berman,et al.  Attention and active vision , 2009, Vision Research.

[18]  J R Duhamel,et al.  The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements. , 1992, Science.

[19]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  A Retinotopic Attentional Trace after Saccadic Eye Movements: Evidence from Event-related Potentials , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  P. Corballis,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of presaccadic remapping in humans. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[21]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Electrophysiological Measures of Maintaining Representations in Visual Working Memory , 2007, Cortex.

[22]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Delineating the Neural Signatures of Tracking Spatial Position and Working Memory during Attentive Tracking , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Measurement of ERP latency differences: a comparison of single-participant and jackknife-based scoring methods. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[24]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Using the jackknife-based scoring method for measuring LRP onset effects in factorial designs. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[25]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Space and attention in parietal cortex. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.