Multi-agent control of community and utility using Lagrangian relaxation based dual decomposition

Abstract In multi-agent based demand response program, communities and a utility make decisions independently and they interact with each other with limited information sharing. This paper presents the design of multi-agent based demand response program while considering ac network constraints. This project develops two types of information sharing and iterative decision making procedures for the utility and communities to reach Nash equilibrium. The distributed algorithms of decision making are based on Lagrangian relaxation, duality, and the concept of upper and lower bounds. The first algorithm is subgradient iteration based distributed decision making algorithm and the second algorithm is based on lower bound and upper bound switching. The two algorithms require different information flow between the utility and communities. With the adoption of distributed algorithms, the utility solves optimal power flow at each iteration while considering ac network constraints, and the communities also conduct optimization. Through information sharing, the utility and the communities update their decisions until convergence is reached. The decision making algorithms are tested against three test cases: a distribution network IEEE 399 system, two meshed networks (IEEE 30-bus system and IEEE 300-bus system). Fast convergence is observed in all three cases, which indicates the feasibility of the demand response design.

[1]  Fangxing Li,et al.  Small test systems for power system economic studies , 2010, IEEE PES General Meeting.

[2]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Parallel and distributed computation , 1989 .

[3]  Ian A. Hiskens,et al.  Incentive-based coordinated charging control of plug-in electric vehicles at the distribution-transformer level , 2012, 2012 American Control Conference (ACC).

[4]  Vincent W. S. Wong,et al.  Autonomous Demand-Side Management Based on Game-Theoretic Energy Consumption Scheduling for the Future Smart Grid , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[5]  R D Zimmerman,et al.  MATPOWER: Steady-State Operations, Planning, and Analysis Tools for Power Systems Research and Education , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  Jason R. Marden,et al.  Designing games for distributed optimization , 2011, IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference.

[7]  Daniel Pérez Palomar,et al.  A tutorial on decomposition methods for network utility maximization , 2006, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[8]  Na Li,et al.  Optimal demand response based on utility maximization in power networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[9]  G Andersson,et al.  A Lagrangian Decomposition Algorithm for Optimal Emergency Voltage Control , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  Walid Saad,et al.  Game-Theoretic Methods for the Smart Grid: An Overview of Microgrid Systems, Demand-Side Management, and Smart Grid Communications , 2012, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[11]  Na Li,et al.  Two Market Models for Demand Response in Power Networks , 2010, 2010 First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications.

[12]  Peter B. Luh,et al.  Scheduling of manufacturing systems using the Lagrangian relaxation technique , 1991, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..