Screening ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography in women with mammographically dense breasts.

There are potential benefits and harms of screening ultrasound (US) to supplement mammographic screening of women with dense breast tissue. We conducted a comprehensive literature review of studies assessing the efficacy of screening US to supplement mammography among women with dense breasts. From a total of 189 peer-reviewed publications on the performance of screening US, 12 studies were relevant to our analysis. The reporting of breast cancer risk factors varied across studies; however, the study populations tended to be at greater than average risk for developing breast cancer. Overall, US detected an additional 0.3-7.7 cancers per 1000 examinations (median, 4.2) and was associated with an additional 11.7-106.6 biopsies per 1000 examinations (median, 52.2). Significant improvements in cancer detection in dense breasts have been achieved with the transition from film to digital mammography. Thus adjunctive screening with ultrasound should be considered in the context of current screening mammography performance. Clinicians should discuss breast density as 1 of several important breast cancer risk factors, consider the potential harms of adjunctive screening, and arrive at a shared decision consistent with each woman's preferences and values.

[1]  Pavel Crystal,et al.  Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  Etta D Pisano,et al.  Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. , 2012, JAMA.

[3]  M. Kallergi,et al.  Simulation model of mammographic calcifications based on the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, or BIRADS. , 1998, Academic radiology.

[4]  L. Leong,et al.  Supplementary breast ultrasound screening in Asian women with negative but dense mammograms-a pilot study. , 2012, Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.

[5]  L. Manganaro,et al.  Diagnostic utility of combined ultrasonography and mammography in the evaluation of women with mammographically dense breasts. , 2007, Journal of ultrasound.

[6]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[7]  K. Kelly,et al.  Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts , 2009, European Radiology.

[8]  David A Mankoff,et al.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria Breast Cancer Screening. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[9]  R. Senie,et al.  Method of tumor detection influences disease‐free survival of women with breast carcinoma , 1994, Cancer.

[10]  Automated 3-D breast ultrasound as a promising adjunctive screening tool for examining dense breast tissue. , 2011, Seminars in roentgenology.

[11]  Enzo Galligioni,et al.  Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up. , 2011, European journal of cancer.

[12]  K. Maughan,et al.  Treatment of breast cancer. , 2010, American family physician.

[13]  D. Altman,et al.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review , 2012, British Journal of Cancer.

[14]  Baudouin Maldague,et al.  Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: the importance of radiologic breast density. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Breast ultrasound in 22,131 asymptomatic women with negative mammography. , 2013, Breast.

[16]  M. Rezai,et al.  First evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of an automated 3D ultrasound system in a breast screening setting. , 2011, Anticancer research.

[17]  J. Weigert,et al.  The Connecticut Experiment: The Role of Ultrasound in the Screening of Women With Dense Breasts , 2012, The breast journal.

[18]  C. Lehman,et al.  Comparative Effectiveness of Digital Versus Film-Screen Mammography in Community Practice in the United States , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[19]  D. Vanel The American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System (BI-RADS): a step towards a universal radiological language? , 2007, European journal of radiology.

[20]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Individual and Combined Effects of Age, Breast Density, and Hormone Replacement Therapy Use on the Accuracy of Screening Mammography , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[21]  Markus Hahn,et al.  Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. A systematic review , 2009, BMC Cancer.

[22]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Negligible Advantages and Excess Costs of Routine Addition of Breast Ultrasonography to Mammography in Dense Breasts , 2007, Tumori.

[23]  S. Obenauer,et al.  Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography , 2002, European Radiology.

[24]  Jean B. Cormack,et al.  Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. , 2008, JAMA.

[25]  T. M. Kolb,et al.  Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. , 2002, Radiology.

[26]  L. Philpotts,et al.  Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41. , 2012, Radiology.

[27]  F. Hall Breast density legislation. , 2013, Radiology.

[28]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Performance benchmarks for screening mammography. , 2006, Radiology.

[29]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Digital Versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  Stefano Ciatto,et al.  The evolving role of new imaging methods in breast screening. , 2011, Preventive medicine.

[31]  V. Giuliano,et al.  Improved breast cancer detection in asymptomatic women using 3D-automated breast ultrasound in mammographically dense breasts. , 2013, Clinical imaging.

[32]  Enzo Galligioni,et al.  Breast screening with ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: evidence on incremental cancer detection and false positives, and associated cost. , 2008, European journal of cancer.

[33]  D. Wakefield,et al.  Real World Performance of Screening Breast Ultrasound Following Enactment of Connecticut Bill 458 , 2013, The breast journal.

[34]  N. Cappello Decade of 'normal' mammography reports--the happygram. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[35]  Lawrence W. Bassett,et al.  Breast density legislation and opportunities for patient-centered outcomes research. , 2012, Radiology.

[36]  R. Carlos,et al.  Dense breast legislation in the United States: state of the states. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.