How are bodies special? Effects of body features on spatial reasoning

Embodied views of cognition argue that cognitive processes are influenced by bodily experience. This implies that when people make spatial judgments about human bodies, they bring to bear embodied knowledge that affects spatial reasoning performance. Here, we examined the specific contribution to spatial reasoning of visual features associated with the human body. We used two different tasks to elicit distinct visuospatial transformations: object-based transformations, as elicited in typical mental rotation tasks, and perspective transformations, used in tasks in which people deliberately adopt the egocentric perspective of another person. Body features facilitated performance in both tasks. This result suggests that observers are particularly sensitive to the presence of a human head and body, and that these features allow observers to quickly recognize and encode the spatial configuration of a figure. Contrary to prior reports, this facilitation was not related to the transformation component of task performance. These results suggest that body features facilitate task components other than spatial transformation, including the encoding of stimulus orientation.

[1]  V. Stone,et al.  The Body-Inversion Effect , 2003, Psychological science.

[2]  Max Coltheart,et al.  The effects of inversion and familiarity on face versus body cues to person recognition. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Multiple Systems for Spatial Imagery: Transformations of Objects and Bodies , 2005, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[4]  M. Cole,et al.  Mind, culture, and activity : seminal papers from the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition , 1997 .

[5]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[6]  L M Parsons,et al.  Imagined spatial transformation of one's body. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Sébastien M. Crouzet,et al.  Fast saccades toward faces: face detection in just 100 ms. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[9]  S. Flusberg,et al.  Environmental inversion effects in face perception , 2012, Cognition.

[10]  C C Presson,et al.  Updating after Rotational and Translational Body Movements: Coordinate Structure of Perspective Space , 1994, Perception.

[11]  Klaus Kessler,et al.  The Two Forms of Visuo-Spatial Perspective Taking are Differently Embodied and Subserve Different Spatial Prepositions , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[12]  S. Carey,et al.  Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children , 1994 .

[13]  Karl R Gegenfurtner,et al.  Parallel visual search and rapid animal detection in natural scenes. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[14]  Alfred B. Yu,et al.  The role of animacy in spatial transformations , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[15]  Brice Isableu,et al.  Embodied spatial transformations: "body analogy" for the mental rotation of objects. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  R. Shepard,et al.  The time required to prepare for a rotated stimulus , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[17]  Clark C. Presson,et al.  Mental rotation and the perspective problem , 1973 .

[18]  Michael McCloskey,et al.  Mirror-image confusions: Implications for representation and processing of object orientation , 2010, Cognition.

[19]  Y. Takano Perception of rotated forms: A theory of information types , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Transformations of visuospatial images. , 2005, Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews.

[21]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Human Body , 2001 .

[22]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Images and Their Transformations , 1982 .

[23]  Simon J. Thorpe,et al.  Ultra-rapid object detection with saccadic eye movements: Visual processing speed revisited , 2006, Vision Research.

[24]  Galit Yovel,et al.  It's all in your head: why is the body inversion effect abolished for headless bodies? , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Two kinds of visual perspective taking , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Mental spatial transformations of objects and perspective , 2001, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[27]  L. Cooper,et al.  Mental transformations and visual comparison processes: effects of complexity and similarity. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  Galit Yovel,et al.  The Body Inversion Effect Is Mediated by Face-Selective, Not Body-Selective, Mechanisms , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Mark May,et al.  Separating mental transformations and spatial compatibility effects in the own body transformation task , 2012, Cognitive Processing.

[30]  M. Tarr,et al.  Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  Irvin Rock,et al.  Orientation and form , 1974 .

[32]  Catherine L Reed,et al.  Contributions of Visual and Embodied Expertise to Body Perception , 2012, Perception.