Lateralization thresholds obtained under conditions in which the precedence effect is assumed to operate.

Interaural differences of time (IDT) thresholds were measured with 600-microseconds transients. The initial experiment was a successful replication of previous experiments that have obtained the precedence effect in lateralization paradigms (e.g., Yost and Soderquist, 1984). When a dichotic click followed a diotic click with an interclick interval (ICI) less than 1 ms or larger than 5 ms, IDT thresholds were generally less than 40 microseconds. For ICIs between 1 to 5 ms, IDT thresholds increased to approximately 220 microseconds. Poorest performance was observed for ICIs of 1.75 to 2.35 ms. During the course of conducting a series of planned experiments on this effect, a substantial drop in IDT thresholds was observed across the ICIs of maximum interest (1 to 5 ms). The precedence effect, which we had replicated in our initial experiment, essentially "disappeared" when the subjects were given sufficient practice on the lateralization task. A number of conditions were explored in an unsuccessful attempt to recover the precedence effect in these experienced subjects. The implications of these results are discussed.

[1]  E. B. Newman,et al.  The precedence effect in sound localization. , 1949, The American journal of psychology.

[2]  M B Gardner,et al.  Historical background of the Haas and-or precedence effect. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Letter: Headphone monitoring system for binaural experiments below 1 kHz. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  P M Zurek,et al.  The precedence effect and its possible role in the avoidance of interaural ambiguities. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  W. Yost The dominance region and ripple noise pitch: a test of the peripheral weighting model. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  H. Gaskell The precedence effect , 1983, Hearing Research.

[8]  T Z Strybel,et al.  Conditions under which the Haas precedence effect may or may not occur. , 1987, The Journal of auditory research.

[9]  D. Perrott,et al.  Minimum audible angle thresholds obtained under conditions in which the precedence effect is assumed to operate. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.