Toward Improved Guideline Quality: Using the COGS Statement with GEM

The Conference on Guideline Standardization (COGS) was convened to create a standardized documentation checklist for clinical practice guidelines in an effort to promote guideline quality and facilitate implementation. The statement was created by a multidisciplinary panel using a rigorous consensus development methodology. The Guideline Elements Model (GEM) provides a standardized approach to representing guideline documents using XML. In this work, we demonstrate the sufficiency of GEM for describing COGS components. Using the mapping between COGS and GEM elements we built an XSLT application to examine a guideline's adherence (or non-adherence) to the COGS checklist. Once a guideline has been marked up according to the GEM hierarchy, its knowledge content can be reused in multiple ways.

[1]  S. Weingarten.  Practice guidelines and prediction rules should be subject to careful clinical testing. , 1997, JAMA.

[2]  Vimla L. Patel,et al.  Research Paper: Representing Clinical Guidelines in GLIF: Individual and Collaborative Expertise , 1998, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[3]  R. Haynes,et al.  Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 1998, JAMA.

[4]  Aniruddha M. Deshpande,et al.  Standardized Reporting of Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Proposal from the Conference on Guideline Standardization , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  L. Kohn,et al.  To Err Is Human : Building a Safer Health System , 2007 .

[6]  J. Eisenberg,et al.  Changing physicians' practices. , 1993, Tobacco control.

[7]  Richard N. Shiffman,et al.  A preliminary evaluation of guideline content mark-up using GEM-an XML guideline elements model , 2000, AMIA.

[8]  Richard N. Shiffman,et al.  Model Formulation: GEM: A Proposal for a More Comprehensive Guideline Document Model Using XML , 2000, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[9]  Richard N. Shiffman,et al.  Using GEM-encoded guidelines to generate medical logic modules , 2001, AMIA.

[10]  Richard N. Shiffman,et al.  Markup Once, Reuse Often: Reusing Knowledge about Appropriate Practice with GEM-encoded Clinical Guidelines , 2003 .

[11]  M. Mayo-Smith,et al.  Are guidelines following guidelines? The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer-reviewed medical literature. , 1999, JAMA.

[12]  Richard N. Shiffman,et al.  Evaluation of Guideline Quality Using GEM-Q , 2001, MedInfo.

[13]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Development and application of a generic methodology to assess the quality of clinical guidelines. , 1999, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[14]  Richard N. Shiffman,et al.  An implementation framework for GEM encoded guidelines , 2001, AMIA.

[15]  Robert A. Greenes,et al.  Research Paper: The GuideLine Interchange Format: A Model for Representing Guidelines , 1998, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[16]  J. Marc Overhage,et al.  Case Report: Computerizing Guidelines to Improve Care and Patient Outcomes: The Example of Heart Failure , 1995, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..