No return to classical reality

At a fundamental level, the classical picture of the world is dead, and has been dead now for almost a century. Pinning down exactly which quantum phenomena are responsible for this has proved to be a tricky and controversial question, but a lot of progress has been made in the past few decades. We now have a range of precise statements showing that whatever the ultimate laws of nature are, they cannot be classical. In this article, we review results on the fundamental phenomena of quantum theory that cannot be understood in classical terms. We proceed by first granting quite a broad notion of classicality, describe a range of quantum phenomena (such as randomness, discreteness, the indistinguishability of states, measurement-uncertainty, measurement-disturbance, complementarity, non-commutativity, interference, the no-cloning theorem and the collapse of the wave-packet) that do fall under its liberal scope, and then finally describe some aspects of quantum physics that can never admit a classical understanding – the intrinsically quantum mechanical aspects of nature. The most famous of these is Bell’s theorem, but we also review two more recent results in this area. Firstly, Hardy’s theorem shows that even a finite-dimensional quantum system must contain an infinite amount of information, and secondly, the Pusey–Barrett–Rudolph theorem shows that the wave function must be an objective property of an individual quantum system. Besides being of foundational interest, results of this sort now find surprising practical applications in areas such as quantum information science and the simulation of quantum systems.

[1]  Eric G. Cavalcanti,et al.  Measurements on the reality of the wavefunction , 2014, Nature Physics.

[2]  M. Leifer ψ-Epistemic models are exponentially bad at explaining the distinguishability of quantum states. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[3]  J. Schwinger THE GEOMETRY OF QUANTUM STATES. , 1960, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  M. Leifer,et al.  Maximally epistemic interpretations of the quantum state and contextuality. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[5]  T. Fritz,et al.  A Combinatorial Approach to Nonlocality and Contextuality , 2012, Communications in Mathematical Physics.

[6]  Alberto Montina Communication cost of classically simulating a quantum channel with subsequent rank-1 projective measurement , 2011, ArXiv.

[7]  Joshua A. Slater,et al.  An experimental test of all theories with predictive power beyond quantum theory , 2011, 1105.0133.

[8]  R. Callen,et al.  Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatistics, 2nd Edition , 1985 .

[9]  Robert W. Spekkens,et al.  Einstein, Incompleteness, and the Epistemic View of Quantum States , 2007, 0706.2661.

[10]  M. Genovese Research on hidden variable theories: A review of recent progresses , 2005, quant-ph/0701071.

[11]  Alberto Montina Communication complexity and the reality of the wave-function , 2014, ArXiv.

[12]  A. EINsTEIN,et al.  Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete ' ? , 2011 .

[13]  Alberto Montina,et al.  State-space dimensionality in short-memory hidden-variable theories , 2010, 1008.4415.

[14]  Alberto Montina,et al.  Epistemic view of quantum states and communication complexity of quantum channels , 2012, Physical review letters.

[15]  Lucien Hardy,et al.  Quantum ontological excess baggage , 2004 .

[16]  P. Pearce PRINCIPLES OF STATISTICAL MECHANICS , 1998 .

[17]  Seth Lloyd,et al.  Gaussian quantum information , 2011, 1110.3234.

[18]  A. Winter,et al.  Graph-theoretic approach to quantum correlations. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[19]  P. Institute Probability Theories with Dynamic Causal Structure : A New Framework for Quantum Gravity , 2008 .

[20]  H. Weinfurter,et al.  Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry , 2003, 0805.2853.

[21]  E. Jaynes Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics , 1957 .

[22]  Roger Colbeck,et al.  The Completeness of Quantum Theory for Predicting Measurement Outcomes , 2016 .

[23]  Č. Brukner,et al.  Quantum Theory and Beyond: Is Entanglement Special? , 2009, 0911.0695.

[24]  W. Wootters,et al.  A single quantum cannot be cloned , 1982, Nature.

[25]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[26]  Nicholas Harrigan,et al.  Ontological models and the interpretation of contextuality , 2007, 0709.4266.

[27]  Kengo Kamatani,et al.  Efficient strategy for the Markov chain Monte Carlo in high-dimension with heavy-tailed target probability distribution , 2014, Bernoulli.

[28]  L. Hardy Towards quantum gravity: a framework for probabilistic theories with non-fixed causal structure , 2006, gr-qc/0608043.

[29]  John von Neumann,et al.  Zusatze Zur Arbeit ,,Zur Operatorenmethode... , 1932 .

[30]  R. Spekkens,et al.  Towards a formulation of quantum theory as a causally neutral theory of Bayesian inference , 2011, 1107.5849.

[31]  S. Wehner,et al.  Bell Nonlocality , 2013, 1303.2849.

[32]  Renato Renner,et al.  Is a system's wave function in one-to-one correspondence with its elements of reality? , 2011, Physical review letters.

[33]  L. Hardy Reformulating and Reconstructing Quantum Theory , 2011, 1104.2066.

[34]  Robert W. Spekkens,et al.  Reconstruction of Gaussian quantum mechanics from Liouville mechanics with an epistemic restriction , 2011, 1111.5057.

[35]  Shane Mansfield,et al.  Reality of the Quantum State: A Stronger Psi-ontology Theorem , 2014 .

[36]  Alberto Montina,et al.  Exponential communication gap between weak and strong classical simulations of quantum communication , 2013, ArXiv.

[37]  John-Mark A. Allen Quantum superpositions cannot be epistemic , 2015, 1501.05969.

[38]  Matthew F Pusey,et al.  Can different quantum state vectors correspond to the same physical state? An experimental test , 2012, 1211.0942.

[39]  S. Lloyd,et al.  Advances in quantum metrology , 2011, 1102.2318.

[40]  Č. Brukner,et al.  Quantum correlations with no causal order , 2011, Nature Communications.

[41]  Timothy C. Ralph,et al.  Quantum information with continuous variables , 2000, Conference Digest. 2000 International Quantum Electronics Conference (Cat. No.00TH8504).

[42]  P. Grangier,et al.  Experimental Tests of Realistic Local Theories via Bell's Theorem , 1981 .

[43]  R. Spekkens Contextuality for preparations, transformations, and unsharp measurements , 2004, quant-ph/0406166.

[44]  S. Massar,et al.  Bell inequalities for arbitrarily high-dimensional systems. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[45]  R. Spekkens Evidence for the epistemic view of quantum states: A toy theory , 2004, quant-ph/0401052.

[46]  R. Schumann Quantum Information Theory , 2000, quant-ph/0010060.

[47]  J. S. BELLt Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox , 2018 .

[48]  Roger Colbeck,et al.  A system’s wave function is uniquely determined by its underlying physical state , 2013, 1312.7353.

[49]  M. S. Leifer,et al.  Is the Quantum State Real? An Extended Review of -ontology Theorems , 2014, 1409.1570.

[50]  Hans Halvorson,et al.  Deep beauty : understanding the quantum world through mathematical innovation , 2011 .

[51]  A. Holevo Bounds for the quantity of information transmitted by a quantum communication channel , 1973 .

[52]  M. Wilde Quantum Information Theory: Noisy Quantum Shannon Theory , 2013 .

[53]  G. D’Ariano,et al.  Informational derivation of quantum theory , 2010, 1011.6451.

[54]  B. Valiron,et al.  Quantum computations without definite causal structure , 2009, 0912.0195.

[55]  Gilles Brassard,et al.  Quantum Cryptography , 2005, Encyclopedia of Cryptography and Security.

[56]  N. Mermin Quantum theory: Concepts and methods , 1997 .

[57]  Shane Mansfield,et al.  Reality of the quantum state: Towards a stronger ψ-ontology theorem , 2014, 1412.0669.

[58]  H. Callen Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatistics , 1988 .

[59]  David Jennings,et al.  Distinct quantum states can be compatible with a single state of reality. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[60]  Anthony Chefles,et al.  Deterministic quantum state transformations , 1999, quant-ph/9911086.

[61]  Eric G. Cavalcanti,et al.  Measurements on the reality of the wavefunction , 2014 .

[62]  J. W. Humberston Classical mechanics , 1980, Nature.

[63]  E. Schrödinger Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems , 1935, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[64]  H. Schmidt Generalized Bell inequalities and frustrated spin systems , 2006, cond-mat/0604591.

[65]  C. Branciard How ψ-epistemic models fail at explaining the indistinguishability of quantum states. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[66]  D. A. Edwards The mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics , 1979, Synthese.

[67]  B. O. Koopman,et al.  Hamiltonian Systems and Transformation in Hilbert Space. , 1931, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[68]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[69]  Alberto Montina,et al.  Exponential complexity and ontological theories of quantum mechanics , 2007, 0711.4770.

[70]  Gilles Brassard,et al.  Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing , 2014, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[71]  M. Born,et al.  Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. , 1955, Science.

[72]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[73]  O. Maroney How statistical are quantum states , 2012, 1207.6906.

[74]  Markus P. Mueller,et al.  A derivation of quantum theory from physical requirements , 2010, 1004.1483.

[75]  Thierry Paul,et al.  Quantum computation and quantum information , 2007, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.

[76]  J. Neumann Zur Operatorenmethode In Der Klassischen Mechanik , 1932 .

[77]  Roger Colbeck,et al.  No extension of quantum theory can have improved predictive power , 2010, Nature communications.

[78]  Adam Bouland,et al.  ψ-epistemic theories: The role of symmetry , 2013, 1303.2834.

[79]  Dave Bacon,et al.  Classical simulation of quantum entanglement without local hidden variables , 2001 .

[80]  L. Hardy Quantum Theory From Five Reasonable Axioms , 2001, quant-ph/0101012.

[81]  Raymond Lal,et al.  No ψ-epistemic model can fully explain the indistinguishability of quantum states. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[82]  W. Heitler The Principles of Quantum Mechanics , 1947, Nature.

[83]  D. Dieks Communication by EPR devices , 1982 .

[84]  A. Shimony,et al.  Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden Variable Theories. , 1969 .

[85]  Ri-Gui Zhou,et al.  Designing novel reversible BCD adder and parallel adder/subtraction using new reversible logic gates , 2012 .

[86]  D. Spehner Quantum correlations and distinguishability of quantum states , 2014, 1407.3739.

[87]  Matthew F Pusey,et al.  On the reality of the quantum state , 2011, Nature Physics.

[88]  N. Cerf,et al.  Operational quantum theory without predefined time , 2014, 1406.3829.

[89]  J. Bell On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics , 1966 .

[90]  Stefan Wolf,et al.  Necessary and sufficient optimality conditions for classical simulations of quantum communication processes , 2014, ArXiv.