User centred design and validation during the development of domestic brain computer interface applications for people with acquired brain injury and therapists: a multi-stakeholder approach

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to outline the application of user centred design (UCD) within a research project to support the design, development and evaluation of a brain computer interface (BCI) with associated home-based services and remote therapy station for people with acquired brain injury (ABI). Design/methodology/approach – A multi- stakeholder UCD approach was adopted to include people living with ABI, their caregivers and therapists providing rehabilitation. A three-phased iterative approach was implemented: Phase 1 was to gather user requirements, Phase 2 an iterative design phase with end user (EU) groups and therapists and finally the verification and implementation phase. The final phase had two strands of a home-based BCI evaluation with target EUs and their caregivers, alongside this, therapists evaluated the final therapist station that supports the use of the BCI at home. Ethical governance, inline with Ulster University, was awarded. Findings – UCD enabled the co-creation and...

[1]  M. Scherer,et al.  Measuring the relationship of assistive technology use, functional status over time, and consumer-therapist perceptions of ATs. , 1996, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[2]  J. Huggins,et al.  What would brain-computer interface users want? Opinions and priorities of potential users with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2011, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis : official publication of the World Federation of Neurology Research Group on Motor Neuron Diseases.

[3]  A. Kübler,et al.  Flashing characters with famous faces improves ERP-based brain–computer interface performance , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[4]  B. Schneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface. Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1992 .

[5]  Leela Damodaran,et al.  Human factors in the digital world enhancing life style-the challenge for emerging technologies , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  Anton Nijholt,et al.  User Experience Evaluation in BCI: Bridge the Gap , 2011 .

[7]  José del R. Millán,et al.  BNCI Horizon 2020: Towards a Roadmap for the BCI Community , 2015 .

[8]  Suzanne Martin,et al.  P300 Brain Computer Interface Control after an Acquired Brain Injury , 2015 .

[9]  Gernot R. Müller-Putz,et al.  In pursuit of an easy to use brain computer interface for domestic use in a population with brain injury , 2015 .

[10]  Karel Vredenburg,et al.  The state of user-centered design practice , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[11]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[12]  Tobias Kaufmann,et al.  A User Centred Approach for Bringing BCI Controlled Applications to End-Users , 2013 .

[13]  Robert W. Bailey,et al.  Human performance engineering: A guide for system designers , 1982 .

[14]  Donatella Mattia,et al.  A Brain-Computer Interface as Input Channel for a Standard Assistive Technology Software , 2011, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[15]  Eloisa Vargiu,et al.  Brain Computer Interface on Track to Home , 2015, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[16]  Gregg C. Vanderheiden,et al.  Technology and inclusion - Past, present and foreseeable future , 2011 .

[17]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation , 2008, The Lancet Neurology.

[18]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[19]  Louise Demers,et al.  The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): An overview and recent progress , 2002 .

[20]  A. Kübler,et al.  The User-Centered Design as Novel Perspective for Evaluating the Usability of BCI-Controlled Applications , 2014, PloS one.

[21]  Eloisa Vargiu,et al.  Brain Neural Computer Interface for Everyday Home Usage , 2015, HCI.

[22]  Steven Laureys,et al.  The locked-in syndrome : what is it like to be conscious but paralyzed and voiceless? , 2005, Progress in brain research.

[23]  Tobias Kaufmann,et al.  Long-term independent brain-computer interface home use improves quality of life of a patient in the locked-in state: a case study. , 2015, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[24]  Victor R. Basili,et al.  Iterative enhancement: A practical technique for software development , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[25]  Eloisa Vargiu,et al.  Brain–Computer Interfaces on Track to Home: Results of the Evaluation at Disabled End-Users’ Homes and Lessons Learnt , 2015, Front. ICT.

[26]  Patricia Rigby,et al.  The Person-Environment-Occupation Model: A Transactive Approach to Occupational Performance , 1996 .

[27]  Role of Persons with a Disability in the Design Process , 2008, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[28]  Sari Kujala,et al.  User involvement: A review of the benefits and challenges , 2003, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[29]  Jane E Huggins,et al.  Barriers to and mediators of brain–computer interface user acceptance: focus group findings , 2012, Ergonomics.

[30]  Tom Chau,et al.  A Review of Emerging Access Technologies for Individuals With Severe Motor Impairments , 2008, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[31]  Cornelia Herbert,et al.  Brain Painting: Usability testing according to the user-centered design in end users with severe motor paralysis , 2013, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[32]  Patrick Carmichael,et al.  BNCI systems as a potential assistive technology: ethical issues and participatory research in the BrainAble project , 2014, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.