The use of a multivariate analysis to study between-goat variability in feeding behavior and associated rumen pH patterns.

This study examined feeding patterns and their relation to rumen pH. The measured variables were the cumulative time spent chewing (eating or ruminating) and the mean rumen pH, per 20-min intervals (46 intervals altogether). A total of 333 feeding patterns, defined as time-series of measurements for 1 animal and 1 given day during 15 h and 20 min following the afternoon feeding, were collected from 12 stall-housed dairy goats fed a total mixed ration twice daily. The first objective of this study was to analyze the within-day variability of feeding behavior to characterize different feeding patterns. The second objective was to analyze, for each goat, the between-day variability of its feeding behavior. The third objective was to study the influence of feeding behavior on rumen pH. A multivariate method (principal component analysis) was performed on the time spent eating or ruminating during each of the 46 intervals. The factor score plots generated by the principal component analysis highlighted the evolution in time of chewing activities. They also were used to determine 4 different types of feeding behavior in the extreme patterns of the first 2 axes. These feeding patterns were associated with different rumen pH patterns in goats with the same total dry matter intake and mean rumen pH. Some goats had a major eating period immediately after feeding, followed by a period of rumination; this pattern was associated with a marked decrease in rumen pH and a pH nadir below 6.0. Other goats performed alternate periods of eating and ruminating throughout the studied period. The latter feeding pattern was associated with a shorter total duration of rumination, but a more stable rumen pH than the feeding pattern described previously. Feeding pattern was quite constant between days for some goats, but highly variable for others. However, the continuum observed between these 4 groups shows that many intermediate types of behavior can be observed. In conclusion, characterizing animals according to their feeding behavior by using a principal component analysis may provide information on the animal's predisposition to rumen acidosis.

[1]  D Sauvant,et al.  Modeling of off-feed periods caused by subacute acidosis in intensive lactating ruminants: application to goats. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[2]  M. Desnoyers,et al.  Comparison of video recording and a portable electronic device for measuring the feeding behaviour of individually housed dairy goats , 2009 .

[3]  D. Sauvant,et al.  Meta-analysis of 0 to 8 h post-prandial evolution of ruminal pH. , 2008, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[4]  D. Sauvant,et al.  Empirical modelling by meta-analysis of digestive interactions and CH4 production in ruminants , 2007 .

[5]  G. Oetzel,et al.  Understanding and preventing subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy herds: A review , 2006 .

[6]  K. Beauchemin,et al.  Effects of particle size of alfalfa-based dairy cow diets on chewing activity, ruminal fermentation, and milk production. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  V. Fischer,et al.  [Ingestive behavior nycterohemeral patterns of dairy cows, at the beginning and at the end of lactation, fed a corn silage based diet] , 2002 .

[8]  K. Beauchemin,et al.  Effect of concentrate level and feeding management on chewing activities, saliva production, and ruminal pH of lactating dairy cows. , 2002, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  G. Oetzel,et al.  Clinical Aspects of Ruminal Acidosis in Dairy Cattle , 2000, American Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference Proceedings.

[10]  D. Sauvant,et al.  Diet effect on the daily feeding behaviour, frequency and characteristics of meals in dairy goats , 2000 .

[11]  M. Allen.  Relationship between fermentation acid production in the rumen and the requirement for physically effective fiber. , 1997, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  J. Nocek.  Bovine acidosis: implications on laminitis. , 1997, Journal of dairy science.

[13]  W. C. Ellis,et al.  Nycterohemeral eating and ruminating patterns in heifers fed grass or corn silage: analysis by finite Fourier transform. , 1993, Journal of animal science.

[14]  J. L. Albright.  Feeding behavior of dairy cattle , 1993 .

[15]  G. B. Schaalje,et al.  Characterizing rumination patterns of dairy cows using spectral analysis. , 1990, Journal of animal science.

[16]  M. Murphy,et al.  Effect of forage physical form on chewing activity, dry matter intake, and rumen function of dairy cows in early lactation. , 1988, Journal of dairy science.

[17]  A. Heinrichs,et al.  Measuring feed intake patterns and meal size of lactating dairy cows. , 1987, Journal of dairy science.

[18]  M. Murphy,et al.  A quantitative analysis of rumination patterns. , 1983, Journal of animal science.

[19]  J. G. Welch,et al.  Physical Stimulation of Rumination Activity , 1971 .

[20]  R. Davis,et al.  Feed intake and salivary secretion by steers. , 1966, Journal of Animal Science.

[21]  J. Dulphy,et al.  Les tables de la valeur des aliments , 2007 .

[22]  F. Owens,et al.  Acidosis in cattle: a review. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[23]  J. Dulphy,et al.  Quantités ingérées et activités alimentaires comparées des ovins, bovins et caprins recevant des fourrages conservés avec ou sans aliment concentré. I. Etude descriptive , 1990 .

[24]  J. Dulphy,et al.  L'ingestion alimentaire chez les ruminants : modalités et phénomènes associés , 1987 .